Literature DB >> 24924504

[Open anatomic reconstruction of chronic acromioclavicular instability].

K Beitzel1, A D Mazzocca.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of open anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint is combined reconstruction of the AC and coracoclavicular ligaments using a tendon graft. INDICATIONS: Symptomatic instabilities of the AC joint > type III. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Asymptomatic instabilities < type III and general contraindication against elective surgery. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Through the open surgical approach, the exact anatomical insertion sites of the ligamentous structures can be reproduced. In addition, this approach enables accurate repositioning of the AC joint under direct vision (including possible debridement of the intraarticular discus) and an additional fixation of deltotrapezoidal fascia. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Postoperatively, the arm is positioned in an abduction brace for 6-8 weeks. Passive exercises in flexion up to 90° and in external rotation up to 30° are permitted during this period. After 6-8 weeks, free and active motion is allowed.
RESULTS: Between January 2003 and December 2010, 46 patients (9 women and 37 men, mean age 42 ± 13 years) underwent AC combined reconstruction. Complete outcome data were available for 25 patients. Mean length of follow-up was 31 ± 26 months. The mean preoperative coracoclavicular distance was 20.1 ± 5.6 mm; postoperatively the mean distance was 7.1 ± 3.0 mm (p < 0.001) The mean clinical scores also statistically improved (p < 0.001): American Shoulder and Elbow Score improved from 53.4 ± 18.7 points preoperatively to 80.6 ± 25.7 points postoperatively and the Constant Murley Score improved from 60.0 ± 16.7 points preoperatively to 85.2 ± 22.8 points postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24924504     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-013-0277-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  8 in total

1.  A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Augustus D Mazzocca; Stephen A Santangelo; Sean T Johnson; Clifford G Rios; Mark L Dumonski; Robert A Arciero
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 2.  Evaluation and treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries.

Authors:  Augustus D Mazzocca; Robert A Arciero; James Bicos
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Practical management of grade III acromioclavicular separations.

Authors:  Gabriel Trainer; Robert A Arciero; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.638

4.  Graft fixation is highest with anatomic tunnel positioning in acromioclavicular reconstruction.

Authors:  Lauren E Geaney; Knut Beitzel; David M Chowaniec; Mark P Cote; John Apostolakos; Robert A Arciero; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 5.  Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults.

Authors:  Marcel Jun S Tamaoki; João Carlos Belloti; Mário Lenza; Marcelo Hide Matsumoto; Joao Baptista Gomes Dos Santos; Flávio Faloppa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-08-04

Review 6.  Rehabilitation of acromioclavicular joint separations: operative and nonoperative considerations.

Authors:  Mark P Cote; Karen E Wojcik; Gregg Gomlinski; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.182

7.  Anatomy of the clavicle and coracoid process for reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments.

Authors:  Clifford G Rios; Robert A Arciero; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 8.  Current concepts in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  Knut Beitzel; Mark P Cote; John Apostolakos; Olga Solovyova; Christopher H Judson; Connor G Ziegler; Cory M Edgar; Andreas B Imhoff; Robert A Arciero; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.772

  8 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Allo- and autografts show comparable outcomes in chronic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Martin Eigenschink; Philipp R Heuberer; Leo Pauzenberger; Grant E Garrigues; Leonard Achenbach; Sigbjorn Dimmen; Brenda Laky; Lior Laver
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Prevalence of remaining horizontal instability in high-grade acromioclavicular joint injuries surgically managed.

Authors:  Luis Natera Cisneros; Juan Sarasquete Reiriz
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-01-05

3.  Arthroscopically Assisted Stabilization of Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Instability.

Authors:  Frederik Bellmann; Michael Dittrich; Barbara Wirth; Florian Freislederer; Markus Scheibel
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2021-11-08

4.  Stress radiographs for evaluating acromioclavicular joint separations in an active-duty patient population: What have we learned?

Authors:  K Aaron Shaw; John Synovec; Josef Eichinger; Christopher J Tucker; Jason A Grassbaugh; Stephen A Parada
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-02-02

Review 5.  Management of chronic unstable acromioclavicular joint injuries.

Authors:  Luis Natera Cisneros; Juan Sarasquete Reiriz
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-03-08

6.  Arthroscopic-Assisted Coracoclavicular Stabilization With Anchorless Transosseous Double-Row Acromioclavicular Ligament Complex Repair: The Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.

Authors:  Surasak Srimongkolpitak; Adinun Apivatgaroon; Bancha Chernchujit; Surapon Atiprayoon
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-09-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.