Literature DB >> 23333010

Graft fixation is highest with anatomic tunnel positioning in acromioclavicular reconstruction.

Lauren E Geaney1, Knut Beitzel, David M Chowaniec, Mark P Cote, John Apostolakos, Robert A Arciero, Augustus D Mazzocca.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purposes were to determine the bone density at specific bone tunnel locations in the clavicle and to determine ultimate load to failure of a graft fixed with an interference screw at specific areas.
METHODS: Bone mass densitometry was tested at 5-mm intervals from the lateral to the medial end of 11 clavicles (mean age, 70.0 ± 17.7 years). Tunnels were drilled in 10-mm increments from the lateral edge, and tenodesis screws were used to fix semitendinosus grafts in the tunnel. Grafts were cyclically loaded, followed by load to failure.
RESULTS: The bone mineral density (BMD) of the cadaveric clavicles increased from lateral (0.304 ± 0.078 g/cm(2) at 10 mm) to medial (0.760 ± 0.103 g/cm(2) at 50 mm). Load to failure increased from lateral to medial, and most specimens failed by tendon pullout. The load was 125.3 ± 42.5 N at the most lateral tunnel and 349.3 ± 120.3 N at the most medial tunnel. The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.653 between tunnel position and load to failure, 0.659 between bone density and load to failure, and 0.803 between tunnel position and bone density. These all showed strong correlation.
CONCLUSIONS: BMD shows that optimal bone density is found in the anatomic insertion area of the coracoclavicular ligaments between 20 mm and 50 mm from the lateral end of the clavicle. Low BMD correlated with decreased load to failure. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Failure at the lateral bone tunnel in coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction may be a result of poor bone quality. When one is drilling bone tunnels for this surgery, consideration should be given to both anatomic position and bone quality.
Copyright © 2013 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23333010     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  13 in total

Review 1.  Allo- and autografts show comparable outcomes in chronic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Martin Eigenschink; Philipp R Heuberer; Leo Pauzenberger; Grant E Garrigues; Leonard Achenbach; Sigbjorn Dimmen; Brenda Laky; Lior Laver
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Acromion morphology and bone mineral density distribution suggest favorable fixation points for anatomic acromioclavicular reconstruction.

Authors:  Andreas Voss; Felix Dyrna; Andrea Achtnich; Alex Hoberman; Elifho Obopilwe; Andreas B Imhoff; Augustus D Mazzocca; Knut Beitzel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  [Open anatomic reconstruction of chronic acromioclavicular instability].

Authors:  K Beitzel; A D Mazzocca
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 4.  Shoulder acromioclavicular joint reconstruction options and outcomes.

Authors:  Simon Lee; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

5.  Sex-Based Differences in Optimal Tunnel Placement for Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kyra A Benavent; Dafang Zhang; Elizabeth G Matzkin; Brandon E Earp
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-01-10

6.  Minimum 10-Year Outcomes After Revision Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Instability.

Authors:  Daniel P Berthold; Lukas N Muench; Knut Beitzel; Simon Archambault; Aulon Jerliu; Mark P Cote; Bastian Scheiderer; Andreas B Imhoff; Robert A Arciero; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-09-16

7.  Arthroscopic Reconstruction of the Coracoclavicular Ligaments Using a Coracoid Cerclage Technique.

Authors:  Nata Parnes; Maryellen Blevins; Paul Carey; Brian Carr
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-03-14

8.  The importance of biomechanical properties in revision acromioclavicular joint stabilization: a scoping review.

Authors:  Felix Dyrna; Daniel P Berthold; Matthias J Feucht; Lukas N Muench; Frank Martetschläger; Andreas B Imhoff; Augustus D Mazzocca; Knut Beitzel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Arthroscopically Assisted Coracoclavicular Fixation Using a Single Flip Button Device Technique: What Are the Main Factors Affecting the Maintenance of Reduction?

Authors:  Yong-Beom Lee; Jeehyoung Kim; Ho-Won Lee; Byung-Su Kim; Won-Yong Yoon; Yon-Sik Yoo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Biomechanical Comparison of Fracture Risk Created by 2 Different Clavicle Tunnel Preparations for Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael S Nuzzo; Gregory J Adamson; Thay Q Lee; Michelle H McGarry; Lisa Husak
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2014-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.