Literature DB >> 18332693

Practical management of grade III acromioclavicular separations.

Gabriel Trainer1, Robert A Arciero, Augustus D Mazzocca.   

Abstract

Acromioclavicular joint (AC) injuries are common in the young athletic population. There is general agreement that grade I and grade II separations are best managed nonoperatively, whereas grades IV to VI warrant surgical stabilization. In contrast, considerable controversy exists surrounding the best method of treatment for grade III AC separations. The trend in recent literature is toward the initial nonoperative management of these injuries. However, consideration of other factors such as type of sport, timing of injury relative to athletic season, or the throwing demands in an injured dominant arm may play a role in the decision to treat grade III injuries operatively or nonoperatively. We offer a protocol algorithm for treating grade III AC separations for managing this controversial injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18332693     DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318169f4c1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Sport Med        ISSN: 1050-642X            Impact factor:   3.638


  20 in total

1.  Anatomic and non-anatomic reconstruction improves post-operative outcomes in chronic acromio-clavicular instability: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francisco Xará-Leite; Renato Andrade; Pedro Silva Moreira; Luís Coutinho; Olufemi R Ayeni; Nuno Sevivas; João Espregueira-Mendes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  [Post-traumatic bipolar dislocation of the clavicle: is operative treatment reasonable?].

Authors:  M Dudda; C Kruppa; T A Schildhauer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  [Open anatomic reconstruction of chronic acromioclavicular instability].

Authors:  K Beitzel; A D Mazzocca
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 4.  Shoulder acromioclavicular joint reconstruction options and outcomes.

Authors:  Simon Lee; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

5.  Scapular dyskinesis and SICK scapula syndrome following surgical treatment of type III acute acromioclavicular dislocations.

Authors:  Luigi Murena; Gianluca Canton; Ettore Vulcano; Paolo Cherubino
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Conservative management of a type III acromioclavicular separation: a case report and 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Andrew J Robb; Scott Howitt
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2011-12

7.  The importance of biomechanical properties in revision acromioclavicular joint stabilization: a scoping review.

Authors:  Felix Dyrna; Daniel P Berthold; Matthias J Feucht; Lukas N Muench; Frank Martetschläger; Andreas B Imhoff; Augustus D Mazzocca; Knut Beitzel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Stress radiographs for evaluating acromioclavicular joint separations in an active-duty patient population: What have we learned?

Authors:  K Aaron Shaw; John Synovec; Josef Eichinger; Christopher J Tucker; Jason A Grassbaugh; Stephen A Parada
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-02-02

9.  Epidemiology of isolated acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Claudio Chillemi; Vincenzo Franceschini; Luca Dei Giudici; Ambra Alibardi; Francesco Salate Santone; Luis J Ramos Alday; Marcello Osimani
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 1.112

10.  Management of type 3 acromioclavicular joint dislocation: comparison of long-term functional results of two operative methods.

Authors:  Hari Kovilazhikathu Sugathan; Ronald Martin Dodenhoff
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2012-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.