PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review of the literature in relation to 3 considerations in determining treatment options for patients with acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations: (1) operative versus nonoperative management, (2) early versus delayed surgical intervention, and (3) anatomic versus nonanatomic techniques. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched in October 2011 using the single term acromioclavicular and the following search limits: any date, humans, English, and all adult (19+). Studies were included if they compared operative with nonoperative treatment, early with delayed surgical intervention, or anatomic with nonanatomic surgical techniques. Exclusion criteria consisted of the following: Level V evidence, laboratory studies, radiographic studies, biomechanical studies, fractures or revisions, meta-analyses, and studies reporting preliminary results. RESULTS: This query resulted in 821 citations. Of these, 617 were excluded based on the title of the study. The abstracts and articles were reviewed, which resulted in the final group of 20 studies that consisted of 14 comparing operative with nonoperative treatment, 4 comparing early with delayed surgical intervention, and 2 comparing anatomic with nonanatomic surgical techniques. The lack of higher level evidence prompted review of previously excluded studies in an effort to explore patterns of publication related to operative treatment of the AC joint. This review identified 120 studies describing 162 techniques for operative reconstruction of the AC joint. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of evidence to support treatment options for patients with AC joint dislocations. Although there is a general consensus for nonoperative treatment of Rockwood type I and II lesions, initial nonsurgical treatment of type III lesions, and operative intervention for Rockwood type IV to VI lesions, further research is needed to determine if differences exist regarding early versus delayed surgical intervention and anatomic versus nonanatomic surgical techniques in the treatment of patients with AC joint dislocations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review of Level II and Level III studies and one case series.
PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review of the literature in relation to 3 considerations in determining treatment options for patients with acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations: (1) operative versus nonoperative management, (2) early versus delayed surgical intervention, and (3) anatomic versus nonanatomic techniques. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched in October 2011 using the single term acromioclavicular and the following search limits: any date, humans, English, and all adult (19+). Studies were included if they compared operative with nonoperative treatment, early with delayed surgical intervention, or anatomic with nonanatomic surgical techniques. Exclusion criteria consisted of the following: Level V evidence, laboratory studies, radiographic studies, biomechanical studies, fractures or revisions, meta-analyses, and studies reporting preliminary results. RESULTS: This query resulted in 821 citations. Of these, 617 were excluded based on the title of the study. The abstracts and articles were reviewed, which resulted in the final group of 20 studies that consisted of 14 comparing operative with nonoperative treatment, 4 comparing early with delayed surgical intervention, and 2 comparing anatomic with nonanatomic surgical techniques. The lack of higher level evidence prompted review of previously excluded studies in an effort to explore patterns of publication related to operative treatment of the AC joint. This review identified 120 studies describing 162 techniques for operative reconstruction of the AC joint. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of evidence to support treatment options for patients with AC joint dislocations. Although there is a general consensus for nonoperative treatment of Rockwood type I and II lesions, initial nonsurgical treatment of type III lesions, and operative intervention for Rockwood type IV to VI lesions, further research is needed to determine if differences exist regarding early versus delayed surgical intervention and anatomic versus nonanatomic surgical techniques in the treatment of patients with AC joint dislocations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review of Level II and Level III studies and one case series.
Authors: M M Schneider; M Balke; P Koenen; M Fröhlich; A Wafaisade; B Bouillon; M Banerjee Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2014-11-16 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Lukas Weiser; Jakob V Nüchtern; Kay Sellenschloh; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Johannes M Rueger; Michael Hoffmann; Wolfgang Lehmann; Lars G Großterlinden Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2015-12-19 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Luis Natera Cisneros; Juan Sarasquete Reiriz; Marina Besalduch; Alexandru Petrica; Ana Escolà; Joaquim Rodriguez; Jan Carlo Fallone Journal: Arthrosc Tech Date: 2015-11-23
Authors: Maurice Balke; Marco M Schneider; Sven Shafizadeh; Holger Bäthis; Bertil Bouillon; Marc Banerjee Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2013-12-04 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Tim Saier; Arne J Venjakob; Philipp Minzlaff; Peter Föhr; Filip Lindell; Andreas B Imhoff; Stephan Vogt; Sepp Braun Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2014-02-21 Impact factor: 4.342