Literature DB >> 24922683

Glasgow prognostic score is a useful predictive factor of outcome after palliative gastrectomy for stage IV gastric cancer.

Kenji Mimatsu1, Takatsugu Oida2, Nobutada Fukino2, Hisao Kano2, Atsushi Kawasaki2, Kazutoshi Kida2, Youichi Kuboi2, Sadao Amano3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) is a predictor of outcome for several cancer types. The present study examined the significance of modified GPS (mGPS) in the prognosis of patients undergoing palliative surgery for stage IV gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 42 patients with stage IV gastric cancer treated with palliative gastrectomy and gastrojejunostomy were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between clinicopathological factors and cancer-specific survival (CS).
RESULTS: Among patients who underwent palliative surgery including gastrectomy and gastrojejunostomy, univariate analysis of CS identified the following significant risk factors: surgical treatment, chemotherapy and mGPS, and multivariate analysis revealed that mGPS was independently-associated with CS. In particular, among patients who underwent palliative gastrectomy, mGPS was shown to be the strongest independent predictive factor for CS.
CONCLUSION: The mGPS was an independent predictive factor for survival in patients who underwent palliative surgery for stage IV incurable gastric cancer, especially for those who underwent palliative gastrectomy. Copyright
© 2014 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glasgow prognostic score; Stage IV gastric cancer; palliative gastrectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24922683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  9 in total

1.  Postoperative Prolonged Inflammatory Response as a Poor Prognostic Factor After Curative Resection for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Okumura; Naoki Hiki; Koshi Kumagai; Satoshi Ida; Souya Nunobe; Manabu Ohashi; Takeshi Sano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Which preoperative immunonutritional index best predicts postoperative mortality after palliative surgery for malignant bowel obstruction in patients with late-stage cancer? A single-center study in Japan comparing the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and the controlling nutritional status (CONUT).

Authors:  Yasuo Nagashima; Kimihiko Funahashi; Satoru Kagami; Mitsunori Ushigome; Tomoaki Kaneko; Yasuyuki Miura; Kimihiko Yoshida; Takamaru Koda; Akiharu Kurihara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Postoperative survival According to the Glasgow Prognosticzzm321990Score in Patients with Resected Lung Adenocarcinoma

Authors:  Yuichiro Machida; Motoyasu Sagawa; Makoto Tanaka; Nozomu Motono; Takuma Matsui; Katsuo Usuda; Hidetaka Uramoto
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2016-10-01

4.  Inflammatory markers for predicting overall survival in gastric cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mi-Rae Kim; A-Sol Kim; Hye-In Choi; Jae-Hun Jung; Ji Yeon Park; Hae-Jin Ko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Calculation of a clinical predictive factors identifying peritoneal disease on a staging laparoscopy in gastric cancers.

Authors:  Caleb Harris; Vikas Ostwal; Dilip Harindran Vallathol; Rohit Dusane; Sarika Mandavkar; Shraddha Patkar; Anant Ramaswamy; Shailesh V Shrikhande
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

6.  Gastrectomy for stage IV gastric cancer: a comparison of different treatment strategies from the SEER database.

Authors:  Jacopo Desiderio; Andrea Sagnotta; Irene Terrenato; Bruno Annibale; Stefano Trastulli; Federico Tozzi; Vito D'Andrea; Sergio Bracarda; Eleonora Garofoli; Yuman Fong; Yanghee Woo; Amilcare Parisi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The relationship between Glasgow Prognostic Score and serum tumor markers in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ai-Gui Jiang; Hong-Lin Chen; Hui-Yu Lu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  The systemic inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score as a powerful prognostic factor in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Teruo Inamoto; Hideyasu Matsuyama; Shigeru Sakano; Naokazu Ibuki; Kiyoshi Takahara; Kazumasa Komura; Tomoaki Takai; Takuya Tsujino; Yuki Yoshikawa; Koichiro Minami; Kazuhiro Nagao; Ryo Inoue; Haruhito Azuma
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-23

Review 9.  Prognostic Role of Glasgow Prognostic Score in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mu-Xing Li; Xin-Yu Bi; Zhi-Yu Li; Zhen Huang; Yue Han; Jian-Guo Zhou; Jian-Jun Zhao; Ye-Fan Zhang; Hong Zhao; Jian-Qiang Cai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.