Literature DB >> 27892939

Postoperative survival According to the Glasgow Prognosticzzm321990Score in Patients with Resected Lung Adenocarcinoma

Yuichiro Machida1, Motoyasu Sagawa, Makoto Tanaka, Nozomu Motono, Takuma Matsui, Katsuo Usuda, Hidetaka Uramoto.   

Abstract

Background: The Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) is calculated from measured CRP and albumin levels. We here evaluated the significance of the GPS in patients with resected pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Materials and
Methods: The present study included 156 patients with lung adenocarcinoma who underwent lobectomy at Kanazawa Medical University between 2002 and 2012. Classification was into three groups: those with normal albumin (>=3.5 g/dl) and C-reactive protein (CRP) (<=1.0 mg/dl) levels were classified as GPS 0 (n =136), those with low albumin (<3.5 g/ dl) or elevated CRP (>1.0 mg/dl) levels as GPS 1 (n = 16), and those with low albumin (<3.5 g/dl) and elevated CRP (>1.0 mg/dl) levels as GPS 2 (n = 4). We retrospectively investigated relationships between the patient characteristics including the GPS, and disease-free survival and cancer-specific survival.
Results: The pathological stages of the patients were as follows: IA (n=78, 50%), IB (n=31, 19.9%), IIA (n=20.0, 12.8%), IIB (n=9.0, 5.7%), and IIIA (n=18.0, 11.5%). Lobectomy was performed in all cases. The average GPS was 0.15 (0-2) and showed significant relationships with stage and tumor size. The 2-year survival rates in patients with GPS0, 1 and 2 were 81.4%, 38.4%, and 25.0%, respectively. Clear correlations were noted with both cancer-specific survival and disease-free survival. Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed that GPS was a significant prognostic factor. Conclusions: The GPS could be a prognostic factor for patients with resected pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Creative Commons Attribution License

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lung adenocarcinoma; glasgow prognostic score; prognosis

Year:  2016        PMID: 27892939      PMCID: PMC5454616          DOI: 10.22034/apjcp.2016.17.10.4677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 1513-7368


Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide (Jemal A et al., 2011). Lung adenocarcinoma, the most common type of primary lung cancer, is diagnosed in 1 million patients each year (Siegel R et al., 2014). Targeted therapy has been successful in a subset of lung adenocarcinoma patients with driver oncogenic mutations (Lynch TJ et al., 2004). However, the effect is still insufficient, and lung adenocarcinoma is still associated with a high rate of mortality. Studies have found that the prognosis of cancer is related to inflammation (Mei Z et al., 2014). Inflammation-based prognostic scores have been developed to predict the prognosis of cancer patients. The Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), which is based on serum albumin and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, is the most commonly used scoring system (Al Murri AM et al., 2006). Recently, the GPS has been reported to be a prognostic factor for patients with cancer (Mimatsu K et al., 2014: La Torre M et al., 2012: Horino K et al., 2013: Vashist YK et al., 2011). An elevated GPS has been shown to be associated with a worse prognosis in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Forrest LM et al., 2003: Forrest LM et al., 2005). Furthermore, Tomita et al. reported that the preoperative GPS may be useful to predict the prognosis of patients with NSCLC (Tomita M et al., 2014); however, the report did not focus patients with lung adenocarcinoma, which is relatively homogeneous group. We therefore examined postoperative survival, according to the GPS, in patients with resected pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

Materials and Methods

Patients

We retrospectively reviewed a database of 156.0 continuous patients (75.0 men and 81.0 women) who underwent lobectomy at Kanazawa Medical University between 2002 and 2012. All patients underwent pulmonary lobectomy and had histologically-confirmed primary pulmonary adenocarcinomas. Tumors were classified according to the TNM classification (7th edition) (Goldstraw P et al., 2007). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan (I045).

Measurement of Glasgow prognostic score

The blood sample collection was performed on admission. The GPS definitions were as follows: Patients with a CRP level of < 10 mg/L and an albumin level of >35 g/L were allocated to GPS 0. If only the CRP was increased or the albumin level was decreased, the patients were allocated to GPS1. The patients in whom the CRP level was >10 mg/L and the albumin level was <35 g/L were classified as GPS 2. This study is a retrospective design.

Statistical analysis

The prognostic factors were examined using both univariate and multivariate analyses. The disease-free survival (DFI) rates and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios and confidence intervals were estimated with the use of a stratified Cox proportional-hazards model. P values of <0.05 were considered to indicate statistically significance. All statistical analyses were performed using the StatView software program (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).

Results

The baseline patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. The median age of the patients was 65.2 years (range: 31-83). The GPS of the study patients were as follows: GPS0 (n=136, 87.2%), GPS1 (n=16, 10.3%), and GPS2 (n=4.0, 2.5%). Seventy-five patients (48.1%) were male and Eighty-nine patients (57.1%) were smokers. The pathological stages of the patients were as follows: IA (n=78, 50%), IB (n=31, 19.9%), IIA (n=20, 12.8%), IIB (n=9, 5.7%), IIIA (n=18.0, 11.5%). Forty-nine (31.4%) patients had comorbidities. Relationships between GPS and clinicopathological features of the patients are shown in Table 2. Stage and tumor size show significant relationship with GPS.
Table 1

The Patients’ Characteristics

No. of Patients%
Age>=658655.1
<657044.9
Gendermale7548.1
female8151.9
Smoking+8957.1
-6742.9
StageIA7850.0
IB3119.9
IIA2012.8
IIB95.7
IIIA1811.5
Tumor Size>=3.0cm5736.5
<3.0cm9963.5
LN metastasis+3321.2
-12378.8
Differentiation1.214291.0
3.4149.0
GPS0.013687.2
1.01610.3
2.042.5
Table 2

Clinicopathological Characteristics of Study Participants

GPS0GPS1/2p value
Gendermale62130.167
female747
Smoking+8180.159
-5512
Age>=6572140.234
<65646
StageI10270.001
II/IIIA3413
Tumor size>=3cm45120.037
< 3cm918
LN metastasis+2580.055
-11112
Differentiation1.2124181.000
3.4102
The Patients’ Characteristics Clinicopathological Characteristics of Study Participants The 5-year survival rates of patients with GPS 0, 1 and 2 were 86.7%, 56.3% and 25%, respectively (Figure 1). The 5-year survival rates of GPS 1/2 was significant.
Figure 1

The Cancer-Specific Survival of GPS0, 1 and 2 in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients

The Cancer-Specific Survival of GPS0, 1 and 2 in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients The median follow-up period of the survivors was 48.0 months. During the follow-up period, 33 (21.2%) patients died. A Kaplan-Meyer method revealed a significant association between the GPS and the disease-free survival (p=0.001) (Figure 2), and overall survival (p<0.001) (Figure 3). Gender (p=0.011), Smoking (p<0.001), Tumor size (p=0.001), Lymph node metastasis (p<0.001), Differentiation (G3/4) (p=0.047) and GPS (p<0.001) were significantly associated with cancer-specific survival in a univariate analysis (Table 3). The multivariate analysis of these significant variables showed the GPS (HR: 2.9 95% CI: 1.25 -6.67 p=0.013), smoking and tumor size to be independently associated with cancer-specific survival (Table 4).
Figure 2

The Disease-Free Survival of GPS0 and GPS1/2 in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients

Figure 3

The Cancer-Specific Survival of GPS0 and GPS1/2 in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients

Table 3

A Univariate Survival Analysis Examining the Association between the Glasgow Prognostic Scores (GPS) and Survival

ParameterHR95% CIP value
Age(>=65)1.50.7-3.10.249
Gender0.40.2-0.80.011
Smoking3.91.8-8.3<0.001
Tumor Size(>=3cm)4.32.0-9.10.001
LN Metastasis4.62.3-9.3<0.001
Differentiation (G3.4)2.71.0-6.90.047
GPS5.52.6-11.7<0.001
Table 4

The Results of a Multivariate Survival Analysis Examining the Association between the Glasgow Prognostic Scores (GPS) and Survival

PalameterHR95% CIp value
Gender1.60.6-4.70.372
Smoking3.11.1-9.10.04
Tumor Size(>=3cm)2.91.3-6.70.011
LN metastasis2.00.9-4.50.904
Differentiation (G3.4)0.60.1-4.40.63
GPS2.91.2-6.70.013
The Disease-Free Survival of GPS0 and GPS1/2 in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients The Cancer-Specific Survival of GPS0 and GPS1/2 in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients A Univariate Survival Analysis Examining the Association between the Glasgow Prognostic Scores (GPS) and Survival The Results of a Multivariate Survival Analysis Examining the Association between the Glasgow Prognostic Scores (GPS) and Survival

Discussion

Many cancers arise from sites of infection, chronic irritation and inflammation (Coussens LM et al., 2002). The association between inflammation and lung cancer has been extensively reported (Tauler J et al., 2009). Recently, There are reports about the relationship between the GPS and resected lung cancer (Tomita M et al., 2014: Miyazaki T et al., 2015). However, there are no reports on relationship between GPS and resected lung adenocarcinoma. We therefore investigated the relationship between the GPS and resected lung adenocarcinoma. The GPS was found to be correlated with the Stage and tumor size in the present study. Cancer progression releases inflammatory cytokines and growth factors. These are increased as part of the systemic inflammatory response (Canna K et al., 2008) and lead to the production of CRP. When the inflammatory reaction advances, the systemic nutritional status worsens, and the albumin value decreases. Thus, the GPS seemed to be related to the progression, which is reflected by the stage and tumor size. Because GPS may be involved to the LN factor, the LN factor was not associated in survival by multivariable analysis. In the present study, we found that the GPS predicted the prognosis as well as the pathological stage of 156.0 patients who underwent lobectomy for adenocarcinoma. The GPS was associated significantly shorter disease-free survival rates and overall survival in resected lung adenocarcinoma. Moreover, a multivariate analysis revealed that the GPS was a significant prognostic factor for overall survival. Our findings suggest that, similar to other cancers, the GPS could be a very important factor for predicting the prognosis of patients with resected adenocarcinoma of the lung. However, the results should be interpreted with caution because the present study involved a short observation period and a small number of cases. Recently, in NSCLS, it was reported that GPS were positive correlatived with cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1(CYFRA21-1), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS) in patients with advanced NSCLS (Jiang AG et al., 2015). GPS of score 2 predicts a prolonged ICU stay in patients undergoing pneumonectomy (Petrella F et al., 2016). Furthermore, in the other cancers, the presence of a systemic inflammatory response, as evidenced by the GPS, appears to be superior to the subjective assessment of a patient’s performance status (PS) in predicting the response to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer (Crumley AB et al., 2008). The GPS was also found to be an independent negative prognostic factor for overall survival in esophageal cancer patients treated with the combination chemotherapy of docetaxel and nedaplatin as a second-line chemotherapy (Kawabata R et al., 2011). We therefore suggest that the GPS is useful index that is simple and easy to implement in the clinical setting, not only surgery cases but also in chemotherapy cases. These characteristics will make the GPS an important index for various fields. This study has same limitations. This study is retrospective design. In future, prospective study will be necessary. In conclusion, the GPS was demonstrated to be correlated with poor survival. The GPS is therefore important in predicting the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in association with this study.

Abbreviation

GPS: Glasgow Prognostic Score CRP: C-reactive protein NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer HR: hazard ratio
  20 in total

1.  Glasgow Prognostic Score as a useful prognostic factor after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Kei Horino; Toru Beppu; Hideyuki Kuroki; Kosuke Mima; Hirohisa Okabe; Osamu Nakahara; Yoshiaki Ikuta; Akira Chikamoto; Takatoshi Ishiko; Hiroshi Takamori; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Prognostic significance of pre- and postoperative glasgow prognostic score for patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Masaki Tomita; Takanori Ayabe; Eiichi Chosa; Kunihide Nakamura
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.480

3.  Glasgow Prognostic Score is a predictor of perioperative and long-term outcome in patients with only surgically treated esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yogesh K Vashist; Julian Loos; Josephine Dedow; Michael Tachezy; Guentac Uzunoglu; Asad Kutup; Emre F Yekebas; Jakob R Izbicki
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Inflammation-based scoring is a useful prognostic predictor of pulmonary resection for elderly patients with clinical stage I non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Takuro Miyazaki; Naoya Yamasaki; Tomoshi Tsuchiya; Keitaro Matsumoto; Masaki Kunizaki; Daisuke Taniguchi; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours.

Authors:  Peter Goldstraw; John Crowley; Kari Chansky; Dorothy J Giroux; Patti A Groome; Ramon Rami-Porta; Pieter E Postmus; Valerie Rusch; Leslie Sobin
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 6.  Inflammation and cancer.

Authors:  Lisa M Coussens; Zena Werb
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002 Dec 19-26       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Comparison of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) with performance status (ECOG-ps) in patients receiving palliative chemotherapy for gastroesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Andrew B C Crumley; Robert C Stuart; Margaret McKernan; Alexander C McDonald; Donald C McMillan
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 4.029

8.  Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  A M Al Murri; J M S Bartlett; P A Canney; J C Doughty; C Wilson; D C McMillan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  Tumour-infiltrating inflammation and prognosis in colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Z Mei; Y Liu; C Liu; A Cui; Z Liang; G Wang; H Peng; L Cui; C Li
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The relationship between Glasgow Prognostic Score and serum tumor markers in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ai-Gui Jiang; Hong-Lin Chen; Hui-Yu Lu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical significance of Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients with tuberculous pleurisy.

Authors:  Hye Seon Kang; Hwa Young Lee; Jung Im Jung; Ju Sang Kim; Yong Hyun Kim; Seung Joon Kim; Seok Chan Kim; Soon Seog Kwon; Young Kyoon Kim; Ji Young Kang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Prognostic Value of Glasgow Prognostic Score in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chuan-Long Zhang; Kui Fan; Meng-Qi Gao; Bo Pang
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.201

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.