Literature DB >> 29272906

Stylet slow-pull versus standard suction for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.

Payal Saxena1,2, Mohamad El Zein1, Tyler Stevens2, Ahmed Abdelgelil1, Sepideh Besharati1, Ahmed Messallam1, Vivek Kumbhari1, Alba Azola1, Jennifer Brainard3,4, Eun Ji Shin1, Anne Marie Lennon1, Marcia I Canto1, Vikesh K Singh1, Mouen A Khashab1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Standard endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) procedures involve use of no-suction or suction aspiration techniques. A new aspiration method, the stylet slow-pull technique, involves slow withdrawal of the needle stylet to create minimum negative pressure. The aim of this study was to compare the sensitivity of EUS-FNA using stylet slow-pull or suction techniques for malignant solid pancreatic lesions using a standard 22-gauge needle. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting for EUS-FNA of pancreatic mass lesions were randomized to the stylet slow-pull or suction techniques using a 22-gauge needle. Both techniques were standardized for each pass until an adequate specimen was obtained, as determined by rapid on-site cytology examination. Patients were crossed over to the alternative technique after four nondiagnostic passes.
RESULTS: Of 147 patients screened, 121 (mean age 64 ± 13.8 years) met inclusion criteria and were randomized to the stylet slow-pull technique (n = 61) or the suction technique (n = 60). Technical success rates were 96.7 % and 98.3 % in the slow-pull and suction groups, respectively (P > 0.99). The sensitivity for malignancy of EUS-FNA was 82 % in the slow-pull group and 69 % in the suction group (P = 0.10). The first-pass diagnostic rate (42.6 % vs. 38.3 %; P = 0.71), acquisition of core tissue (60.6 % vs. 46.7 %; P = 0.14), and the median (range) number of passes to diagnosis (2 1 2 3 vs. 1 1 2; P = 0.71) were similar in the slow-pull and suction groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The stylet slow-pull and suction techniques both offered high and comparable diagnostic sensitivity with a mean of 2 passes required for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions. The endosonographer may choose either technique during FNA. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29272906      PMCID: PMC6441969          DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-122381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  14 in total

1.  A prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of EUS-guided FNA with and without a stylet.

Authors:  Amit Rastogi; Sachin Wani; Neil Gupta; Vikas Singh; Srinivas Gaddam; Savio Reddymasu; Ozlem Ulusarac; Fang Fan; Maria Romanas; Katie L Dennis; Prateek Sharma; Ajay Bansal; Melissa Oropeza-Vail; Mojtaba Olyaee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Endoscopic ultrasonography with guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in pancreatic disease.

Authors:  P Vilmann; G K Jacobsen; F W Henriksen; S Hancke
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline.

Authors:  J-M Dumonceau; M Polkowski; A Larghi; P Vilmann; M Giovannini; J-L Frossard; D Heresbach; B Pujol; G Fernández-Esparrach; E Vazquez-Sequeiros; A Ginès
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Julio Iglesias-Garcia; J Enrique Dominguez-Munoz; Ihab Abdulkader; Jose Larino-Noia; Elena Eugenyeva; Antonio Lozano-Leon; Jeronimo Forteza-Vila
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Current status of diagnostic endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions.

Authors:  Takao Itoi; Atsushi Sofuni; Fumihide Itokawa; Atsushi Irisawa; Christopher J L Khor; Rungsun Rerknimitr
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.559

6.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with 22- and 25-gauge needles in solid pancreatic masses: a prospective comparative study with randomisation of needle sequence.

Authors:  Carlo Fabbri; Anna Maria Polifemo; Carmelo Luigiano; Vincenzo Cennamo; Paola Baccarini; Guido Collina; Adele Fornelli; Sandro Macchia; Nicola Zanini; Elio Jovine; Marta Fiscaletti; Angela Alibrandi; Nicola D'Imperio
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 4.088

7.  Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.

Authors:  Ji Young Bang; Shantel Hebert-Magee; Jessica Trevino; Jayapal Ramesh; Shyam Varadarajulu
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Diagnostic yield of malignancy during EUS-guided FNA of solid lesions with and without a stylet: a prospective, single blind, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Sachin Wani; Dayna Early; Julie Kunkel; Ann Leathersich; Christine E Hovis; Thomas G Hollander; Cara Kohlmeier; Cynthia Zelenka; Riad Azar; Steven Edmundowicz; Brian Collins; Jingxia Liu; Matthew Hall; Daniel Mullady
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic masses with rapid on-site cytological evaluation by endosonographers without attendance of cytopathologists.

Authors:  Takuto Hikichi; Atsushi Irisawa; Manoop S Bhutani; Tadayuki Takagi; Goro Shibukawa; Go Yamamoto; Takeru Wakatsuki; Hidemichi Imamura; Yuta Takahashi; Ai Sato; Masaki Sato; Tsunehiko Ikeda; Yuko Hashimoto; Kazuhiro Tasaki; Kazuo Watanabe; Hiromasa Ohira; Katsutoshi Obara
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 7.527

10.  Randomized controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle sampling with or without suction for better cytological diagnosis.

Authors:  Rajesh Puri; Peter Vilmann; Adrian Săftoiu; Birgit Guldhammer Skov; Dorte Linnemann; Hazem Hassan; Elymir Soraya Galvis Garcia; Florin Gorunescu
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  The Impact of Recent Advances in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition on the Management of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Susana Marques; Miguel Bispo; Ricardo Rio-Tinto; Paulo Fidalgo; Jacques Devière
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10-23

2.  Grading Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors via Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration: A Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Ammar A Javed; Alessandra Pulvirenti; Samrah Razi; Jian Zheng; Theodoros Michelakos; Yurie Sekigami; Elizabeth Thompson; David S Klimstra; Vikram Deshpande; Aatur D Singhi; Matthew J Weiss; Christopher L Wolfgang; John L Cameron; Alice C Wei; Amer H Zureikat; Cristina R Ferrone; Jin He
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 13.787

3.  Amyloid-Rich Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: a Potential Diagnostic Pitfall in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNAC).

Authors:  Alessandro Gambella; Enrico Costantino Falco; Jasna Metovic; Francesca Maletta; Claudio De Angelis; Roberta Maragliano; Silvia Uccella; Donatella Pacchioni; Mauro Papotti
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.943

4.  Clinical Impact of EUS-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Using a Novel Franseen Needle for Histological Assessment of Pancreatic Diseases.

Authors:  Takuya Ishikawa; Hiroki Kawashima; Eizaburo Ohno; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Daisuke Sakai; Tadashi Iida; Ryo Nishio; Takeshi Yamamura; Kazuhiro Furukawa; Masanao Nakamura; Ryoji Miyahara; Senju Hashimoto; Masatoshi Ishigami; Yoshiki Hirooka
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-02-03

Review 5.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy - Recent topics and technical tips.

Authors:  Kazuya Matsumoto; Yohei Takeda; Takumi Onoyama; Soichiro Kawata; Hiroki Kurumi; Hiroki Koda; Taro Yamashita; Hajime Isomoto
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 1.337

6.  Slow-pull compared to suction technique for EUS-guided sampling of pancreatic solid lesions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Gabriele Capurso; Livia Archibugi; Maria Chiara Petrone; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-04-17

Review 7.  Therapeutic EUS: New tools, new devices, new applications.

Authors:  Barbara Braden; Vipin Gupta; Christoph Frank Dietrich
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.628

8.  Comparative diagnostic accuracy of EUS needles in solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samuel Han; Furqan Bhullar; Omar Alaber; Ayesha Kamal; Puanani Hopson; Kavin Kanthasamy; Sarah Coughlin; Livia Archibugi; Nikhil Thiruvengadam; Christopher Moreau; David Jin; Pedram Paragomi; Francisco Valverde-López; Sajan Nagpal; Cemal Yazici; Georgios Papchristou; Peter J Lee; Venkata Akshintala
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-05-27

9.  Comparison between Conventional Smear and Liquid-Based Preparation in Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Pancreatic Lesions.

Authors:  Soo Hee Ko; Jung-Soo Pyo; Byoung Kwan Son; Hyo Young Lee; Il Whan Oh; Kwang Hyun Chung
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-09

10.  Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration and Biopsy Device for Lymphadenopathy.

Authors:  Yuki Tanisaka; Masafumi Mizuide; Akashi Fujita; Tomoya Ogawa; Ryuichiro Araki; Masahiro Suzuki; Hiromune Katsuda; Youichi Saito; Kazuya Miyaguchi; Tomoaki Tashima; Yumi Mashimo; Masami Yasuda; Shomei Ryozawa
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.