| Literature DB >> 29272906 |
Payal Saxena1,2, Mohamad El Zein1, Tyler Stevens2, Ahmed Abdelgelil1, Sepideh Besharati1, Ahmed Messallam1, Vivek Kumbhari1, Alba Azola1, Jennifer Brainard3,4, Eun Ji Shin1, Anne Marie Lennon1, Marcia I Canto1, Vikesh K Singh1, Mouen A Khashab1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Standard endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) procedures involve use of no-suction or suction aspiration techniques. A new aspiration method, the stylet slow-pull technique, involves slow withdrawal of the needle stylet to create minimum negative pressure. The aim of this study was to compare the sensitivity of EUS-FNA using stylet slow-pull or suction techniques for malignant solid pancreatic lesions using a standard 22-gauge needle. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting for EUS-FNA of pancreatic mass lesions were randomized to the stylet slow-pull or suction techniques using a 22-gauge needle. Both techniques were standardized for each pass until an adequate specimen was obtained, as determined by rapid on-site cytology examination. Patients were crossed over to the alternative technique after four nondiagnostic passes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29272906 PMCID: PMC6441969 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-122381
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endoscopy ISSN: 0013-726X Impact factor: 10.093