Literature DB >> 24920082

Characteristics and experiences of patients with localized prostate cancer who left an active surveillance program.

Zackary D Berger1, Jonathan C Yeh, H Ballentine Carter, Craig Evan Pollack.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding the experiences of men leaving active surveillance programs is critical to making such programs viable for men with localized prostate cancer.
OBJECTIVE: To generate hypotheses about the factors that influence patients' decisions to leave an active surveillance program.
METHODS: Using data from the Johns Hopkins active surveillance cohort, bivariate analyses and multinomial regression models examined characteristics of men who self-elected to leave, those who stayed in the program, and those who left because of disease reclassification. We interviewed patients who self-elected to leave.
RESULTS: Of 1,159 men in active surveillance, 9 % self-elected to leave. In interviews with a sample of 14 men who self-elected to leave, uncertainty involved in active surveillance participation, existence of personal criteria-distinct from providers' clinical criteria-and fear of cancer were important factors in decisions to leave.
CONCLUSION: Men leaving active surveillance were motivated by a number of factors, including patient-defined criteria, which might differ from clinical recommendations. To ensure active surveillance participation, it may be important to address cancer-related anxiety and personal criteria underlying patient decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24920082      PMCID: PMC4332784          DOI: 10.1007/s40271-014-0066-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient        ISSN: 1178-1653            Impact factor:   3.883


  25 in total

1.  Factors influencing patients' acceptance and adherence to active surveillance.

Authors:  David F Penson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-12

Review 2.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: progress and promise.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Peter R Carroll; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Bruce J Trock; Patricia Landis; Zhaoyong Feng; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Factors influencing treatment decision making and information preferences of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance.

Authors:  Barbara Joyce Davison; Erin Breckon
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-12-15

5.  National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference: role of active surveillance in the management of men with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Patricia A Ganz; John M Barry; Wylie Burke; Nananda F Col; Phaedra S Corso; Everett Dodson; M Elizabeth Hammond; Barry A Kogan; Charles F Lynch; Lee Newcomer; Eric J Seifter; Janet A Tooze; Kasisomayajula Viswanath; Hunter Wessells
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice.

Authors:  Ian R White; Patrick Royston; Angela M Wood
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Patterns of primary and secondary therapy for prostate cancer in elderly men: analysis of data from CaPSURE.

Authors:  Badrinath R Konety; Janet E Cowan; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The self-management of uncertainty among men undertaking active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  John L Oliffe; B Joyce Davison; Tom Pickles; Lawrence Mróz
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2009-02-19

9.  Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz; Liying Zhang; Adam Lam; Robert Nam; Alexandre Mamedov; Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  A preliminary exploration of the feasibility of offering men information about potential prostate cancer treatment options before they know their biopsy results.

Authors:  Steven B Zeliadt; Peggy A Hannon; Ranak B Trivedi; Laura M Bonner; Thuy T Vu; Carol Simons; Crystal A Kimmie; Elaine Y Hu; Chris Zipperer; Daniel W Lin
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Prostate Biopsy in Active Surveillance Protocols: Immediate Re-biopsy and Timing of Subsequent Biopsies.

Authors:  Jonathan H Wang; Tracy M Downs; E Jason Abel; Kyle A Richards; David F Jarrard
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  The Voice of the Patient Methodology: A Novel Mixed-Methods Approach to Identifying Treatment Goals for Men with Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Christopher S Saigal; Sylvia I Lambrechts; V Seenu Srinivasan; Ely Dahan
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  Does true Gleason pattern 3 merit its cancer descriptor?

Authors:  Saiful Miah; Hashim U Ahmed; Alex Freeman; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Factors Influencing Men's Choice of and Adherence to Active Surveillance for Low-risk Prostate Cancer: A Mixed-method Systematic Review.

Authors:  Netty Kinsella; Pär Stattin; Declan Cahill; Christian Brown; Anna Bill-Axelson; Ola Bratt; Sigrid Carlsson; Mieke Van Hemelrijck
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Conditional probability of reclassification in an active surveillance program for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ridwan Alam; H Ballentine Carter; Patricia Landis; Jonathan I Epstein; Mufaddal Mamawala
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  The Influence of Psychosocial Constructs on the Adherence to Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer in a Prospective, Population-based Cohort.

Authors:  Maximilian F Lang; Mark D Tyson; JoAnn Rudd Alvarez; Tatsuki Koyama; Karen E Hoffman; Matthew J Resnick; Matthew R Cooperberg; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Vivien Chen; Lisa E Paddock; Ann S Hamilton; Mia Hashibe; Michael Goodman; Sheldon Greenfield; Sherrie H Kaplan; Antoinette Stroup; David F Penson; Daniel A Barocas
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Informational needs during active surveillance for prostate cancer: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Caitlin Curnyn; Angela Fagerlin; R Scott Braithwaite; Mark D Schwartz; Herbert Lepor; H Ballentine Carter; Shannon Ciprut; Erica Sedlander
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-09-01

8.  The Mind: Focal Cryotherapy in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Are We Treating the Cancer or the Mind?

Authors:  Leonardo de Oliveira Reis; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 9.  Patient and provider experiences with active surveillance: A scoping review.

Authors:  Claire Kim; Frances C Wright; Nicole J Look Hong; Gary Groot; Lucy Helyer; Pamela Meiers; May Lynn Quan; Robin Urquhart; Rebecca Warburton; Anna R Gagliardi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Patient Factors That Influence How Physicians Discuss Active Surveillance With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Joanna Veazey Brooks; Shellie D Ellis; Emily Morrow; Kim S Kimminau; J Brantley Thrasher
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2018-07-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.