Badrinath R Konety1, Janet E Cowan, Peter R Carroll. 1. Department of Urology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-1695, USA. bkonety@urology.ucsf.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: We examined patterns of primary treatment for prostate cancer in men 75 years or older. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from the multi-institutional CaPSURE database on the type of primary therapy performed in men younger than 75, or 75 years old or older. Primary therapy was defined as watchful waiting, radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy, brachytherapy plus external beam radiotherapy, external beam radiotherapy or primary androgen deprivation therapy. The chi-square test and multinomial logistic regression analysis were performed to identify predictors of the type of primary therapy and outcomes. RESULTS: A greater proportion of patients 75 years or older were white, single, had multiple comorbidities, low income and low education, and were classified as being at high risk compared to those younger than 75 years (43% vs 25%). On multivariate analysis adjusted for sociodemographic factors, diagnostic risk category and the number of comorbidities at diagnosis patients 75 years or older were less likely to be treated with primary therapy than with watchful waiting regardless of the risk category or comorbidity level. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with high risk cancer are far more likely to be observed regardless of the burden of comorbidity. A more tailored approach to prostate cancer therapy that considers comorbidity and functional level to determine primary therapy may be more appropriate. Well selected older patients with high risk disease, particularly those with low comorbidity levels, may derive survival benefit from a primary therapy other than watchful waiting. Alternatively elderly patients with low risk disease may be better treated with watchful waiting.
PURPOSE: We examined patterns of primary treatment for prostate cancer in men 75 years or older. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from the multi-institutional CaPSURE database on the type of primary therapy performed in men younger than 75, or 75 years old or older. Primary therapy was defined as watchful waiting, radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy, brachytherapy plus external beam radiotherapy, external beam radiotherapy or primary androgen deprivation therapy. The chi-square test and multinomial logistic regression analysis were performed to identify predictors of the type of primary therapy and outcomes. RESULTS: A greater proportion of patients 75 years or older were white, single, had multiple comorbidities, low income and low education, and were classified as being at high risk compared to those younger than 75 years (43% vs 25%). On multivariate analysis adjusted for sociodemographic factors, diagnostic risk category and the number of comorbidities at diagnosis patients 75 years or older were less likely to be treated with primary therapy than with watchful waiting regardless of the risk category or comorbidity level. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with high risk cancer are far more likely to be observed regardless of the burden of comorbidity. A more tailored approach to prostate cancer therapy that considers comorbidity and functional level to determine primary therapy may be more appropriate. Well selected older patients with high risk disease, particularly those with low comorbidity levels, may derive survival benefit from a primary therapy other than watchful waiting. Alternatively elderly patients with low risk disease may be better treated with watchful waiting.
Authors: Leah Y Nakamura; Rafael N Nunez; Paul E Andrews; Robert G Ferrigni; Mitchell R Humphreys; Scott K Swanson; Christopher E Wolter; Erik P Castle Journal: J Robot Surg Date: 2011-02-05
Authors: J J Tosoian; R Alam; C Gergis; A Narang; N Radwan; S Robertson; T McNutt; A E Ross; D Y Song; T L DeWeese; P T Tran; P C Walsh Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Paolo Dell'oglio; Anne Sophie Valiquette; Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah; Zhe Tian; Vincent Trudeau; Alessandro Larcher; Shahrokh F Shariat; Umberto Capitanio; Alberto Briganti; Markus Graefen; Francesco Montorsi; Pierre I Karakiewicz Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Timothy J Daskivich; Julie Lai; Andrew W Dick; Claude M Setodji; Janet M Hanley; Mark S Litwin; Christopher Saigal Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Denalee M O'Malley; Shawna V Hudson; Pamela A Ohman-Strickland; Alicja Bator; Heather S Lee; Daniel A Gundersen; Suzanne M Miller Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Kenneth G Nepple; Andrew J Stephenson; Dorina Kallogjeri; Jeff Michalski; Robert L Grubb; Seth A Strope; Jennifer Haslag-Minoff; Jay F Piccirillo; Jay P Ciezki; Eric A Klein; Chandana A Reddy; Changhong Yu; Michael W Kattan; Adam S Kibel Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 20.096