Literature DB >> 22177658

Factors influencing treatment decision making and information preferences of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance.

Barbara Joyce Davison1, Erin Breckon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess information and decision making preferences of patients on active surveillance (AS), and the factors influencing their decision.
METHODS: A cross-sectional sample of 180 patients on AS for <10 years completed a survey exploring the role men assumed with their physician in treatment decision making (TDM), factors influencing their decision to go on AS, and information preferences.
RESULTS: Thirty-five percent of patients reported assuming an active role in TDM, 38% a collaborative role and 27% a passive role. Results suggest that patients<60 years prefer to play an active role in TDM whereas, men>70 years prefer to play a passive role. Available treatment options, eating a 'prostate friendly' diet, and non-traditional therapies were identified as the top three information preferences. Patients with higher levels of anxiety wanted access to more information compared to those with lower levels of anxiety. The urologists' recommendation was rated the most important factor influencing patients' decisions to go on AS.
CONCLUSION: The urologist's recommendation for treatment continues to have the most influence on the decision to go on AS. Our results suggest that age has an impact on the role patients wish to assume in TDM. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Assessments of patients' information and decision preferences, and levels of anxiety are suggested for all prostate cancer patients considering AS.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22177658     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  51 in total

1.  Decision-making processes among men with low-risk prostate cancer: A survey study.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Kimberly M Davis; Tania Lobo; George Luta; Jun Shan; David Aaronson; David F Penson; Amethyst D Leimpeter; Kathryn L Taylor
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Baseline and follow-up association of the MAX-PC in Men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrea M Tavlarides; Steven C Ames; David D Thiel; Nancy N Diehl; Alexander S Parker
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Characteristics and experiences of patients with localized prostate cancer who left an active surveillance program.

Authors:  Zackary D Berger; Jonathan C Yeh; H Ballentine Carter; Craig Evan Pollack
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Quality of physician-patient relationships is associated with the influence of physician treatment recommendations among patients with prostate cancer who chose active surveillance.

Authors:  Heather Orom; D Lynn Homish; Gregory G Homish; Willie Underwood
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.498

5.  Factors Associated with Men's Assessment of Prostate Cancer Treatment Choice.

Authors:  Louie E Ross; Daniel L Howard; Janice V Bowie; Roland J Thorpe; Ballington L Kinlock; Carol Burt; Thomas A LaVeist
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Discussing Conservative Management With Older Patients With CKD: An Interview Study of Nephrologists.

Authors:  Keren Ladin; Renuka Pandya; Allison Kannam; Rohini Loke; Tira Oskoui; Ronald D Perrone; Klemens B Meyer; Daniel E Weiner; John B Wong
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 8.860

7.  Patients' preferences on information and involvement in decision making for gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Emilie Uldry; Markus Schäfer; Alend Saadi; Valentin Rousson; Nicolas Demartines
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  The Physician Recommendation Coding System (PhyReCS): A Reliable and Valid Method to Quantify the Strength of Physician Recommendations During Clinical Encounters.

Authors:  Karen A Scherr; Angela Fagerlin; Lillie D Williamson; J Kelly Davis; Ilona Fridman; Natalie Atyeo; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Using a Non-Fit Message Helps to De-Intensify Negative Reactions to Tough Advice.

Authors:  Ilona Fridman; Karen A Scherr; Paul A Glare; E Tory Higgins
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2016-08

10.  A hospital-based study of initial observation for low-risk prostate cancer and its predictors in the United States.

Authors:  Matthew J Maurice; Hui Zhu; Robert Abouassaly
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.