Literature DB >> 24919466

Image quality and radiation dose of lower extremity CT angiography at 70 kVp on an integrated circuit detector dual-source computed tomography.

Li Qi1, Yan'E Zhao1, Chang Sheng Zhou1, James V Spearman2, Matthias Renker3, U Joseph Schoepf4, Long Jiang Zhang5, Guang Ming Lu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the well-established requirement for radiation dose reduction there are few studies examining the potential for lower extremity CT angiography (CTA) at 70 kVp.
PURPOSE: To compare the image quality and radiation dose of lower extremity CTA at 70 kVp using a dual-source CT system with an integrated circuit detector to similar studies at 120 kVp.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 62 patients underwent lower extremity CTA. Thirty-one patients were examined at 70 kVp using a second generation dual-source CT with an integrated circuit detector (70 kVp group) and 31 patients were evaluated at 120 kVp using a first generation dual-source CT (120 kVp group). The attenuation and image noise were measured and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Two radiologists assessed image quality. Radiation dose was compared.
RESULTS: The mean attenuation of the 70 kVp group was higher than the 120 kVp group (575 ± 149 Hounsfield units [HU] vs. 258 ± 38 HU, respectively, P < 0.001) as was SNR (44.0 ± 22.0 vs 32.7 ± 13.3, respectively, P = 0.017), CNR (39.7 ± 20.6 vs 26.6 ± 11.7, respectively, P = 0.003) and the mean image quality score (3.7 ± 0.1 vs. 3.2 ± 0.3, respectively, P < 0.001). The inter-observer agreement was good for the 70 kVp group and moderate for the 120 kVp group. The dose-length product was lower in the 70 kVp group (264.5 ± 63.1 mGy × cm vs. 412.4 ± 81.5 mGy × cm, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Lower extremity CTA at 70 kVp allows for lower radiation dose with higher SNR, CNR, and image quality when compared with standard 120 kVp. © The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angiography; X-ray computed tomography (CT); low tube voltage; radiation dosage

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24919466     DOI: 10.1177/0284185114535391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  5 in total

1.  Reducing both radiation and contrast doses in coronary CT angiography in lean patients on a 16-cm wide-detector CT using 70 kVp and ASiR-V algorithm, in comparison with the conventional 100-kVp protocol.

Authors:  Yuhuan Chen; Zhentang Liu; Michelle Li; Yong Yu; Yongjun Jia; Guangming Ma; Zhijun Hu; DongHong Wei; Dou Li; Taiping He
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Radiation dose and image quality of 70 kVp cerebral CT angiography with optimized sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction: comparison with 120 kVp cerebral CT angiography.

Authors:  Guo Zhong Chen; Long Jiang Zhang; U Joseph Schoepf; Julian L Wichmann; Cole M Milliken; Chang Sheng Zhou; Li Qi; Song Luo; Guang Ming Lu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Quick evaluation of lower leg ischemia in patients with peripheral arterial disease by time maximum intensity projection CT angiography: a pilot study.

Authors:  Daming Zhang; Xueyan Zhou; Haiping Zhang; Xiaobing Fan; Zehong Lin; Huadan Xue; Yining Wang; Zhengyu Jin; Yuexin Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 1.930

4.  Assessment of Virtual Monoenergetic Images in Run-off Computed Tomography Angiography: A Comparison Study to Conventional Images From Spectral Detector Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Haiyan Ren; Yanhua Zhen; Zheng Gong; Chuanzhuo Wang; Zhihui Chang; Jiahe Zheng
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr 01       Impact factor: 2.081

5.  High-pitch, low-voltage and low-iodine-concentration CT angiography of aorta: assessment of image quality and radiation dose with iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Yanguang Shen; Zhonghua Sun; Lei Xu; Yu Li; Nan Zhang; Zixu Yan; Zhanming Fan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.