Daming Zhang1, Xueyan Zhou2, Haiping Zhang3, Xiaobing Fan4, Zehong Lin2, Huadan Xue1, Yining Wang1, Zhengyu Jin5, Yuexin Chen6. 1. Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. 2. School of Technology, Harbin University, Harbin, China. 3. Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 4. Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. 5. Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. jinzy@pumch.cn. 6. Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. chenyuexin@pumch.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new method involving time maximum intensity projection (t-MIP) postprocessed from dynamic computed tomographic angiography (dyn-CTA) in diagnosing peripheral arterial disease (PAD). METHODS: A population of 34 patients with known PAD was examined with a combined CTA protocol consisting of a standard CTA (s-CTA) scan of the lower extremities and a dyn-CTA scan of the calves. For each lower leg, t-MIP images consisting of the MIP0 (sagittal MIP), MIP+θ (45° lateral MIP), and MIP-θ (- 45° lateral MIP) were automatically generated from dyn-CTA. An objective evaluation of the vascular CT attenuation of the best enhancement phase of dyn-CTA and t-MIP was measured; a subjective evaluation of vessel stenosis and occlusion was performed, assigning a score for t-MIP and s-CTA. The CT attenuation of t-MIP and dyn-CTA was compared, as were the runoff scores of t-MIP and s-CTA. RESULTS: The CT attenuation of t-MIP CTA of three vascular segments from 68 lower extremities was higher than that of the best enhancement phase of dyn-CTA and s-CTA, with statistically significant differences at the posterior tibial artery and fibular artery (all p < 0.05). There were strong correlations (r ≥ 0.75, p < 0.05) of the runoff scores between t-MIP and s-CTA. CONCLUSIONS: There is potential clinical applicability of t-MIP in assisting with the diagnosis of lower leg vascular stenosis in dyn-CTA with reliable diagnostic accuracy and convenient immediacy.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new method involving time maximum intensity projection (t-MIP) postprocessed from dynamic computed tomographic angiography (dyn-CTA) in diagnosing peripheral arterial disease (PAD). METHODS: A population of 34 patients with known PAD was examined with a combined CTA protocol consisting of a standard CTA (s-CTA) scan of the lower extremities and a dyn-CTA scan of the calves. For each lower leg, t-MIP images consisting of the MIP0 (sagittal MIP), MIP+θ (45° lateral MIP), and MIP-θ (- 45° lateral MIP) were automatically generated from dyn-CTA. An objective evaluation of the vascular CT attenuation of the best enhancement phase of dyn-CTA and t-MIP was measured; a subjective evaluation of vessel stenosis and occlusion was performed, assigning a score for t-MIP and s-CTA. The CT attenuation of t-MIP and dyn-CTA was compared, as were the runoff scores of t-MIP and s-CTA. RESULTS: The CT attenuation of t-MIP CTA of three vascular segments from 68 lower extremities was higher than that of the best enhancement phase of dyn-CTA and s-CTA, with statistically significant differences at the posterior tibial artery and fibular artery (all p < 0.05). There were strong correlations (r ≥ 0.75, p < 0.05) of the runoff scores between t-MIP and s-CTA. CONCLUSIONS: There is potential clinical applicability of t-MIP in assisting with the diagnosis of lower leg vascular stenosis in dyn-CTA with reliable diagnostic accuracy and convenient immediacy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Computed tomographic angiography; Maximum intensity projection; Peripheral arterial disease
Authors: S Napel; M P Marks; G D Rubin; M D Dake; C H McDonnell; S M Song; D R Enzmann; R B Jeffrey Journal: Radiology Date: 1992-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Nico Buls; Yannick de Brucker; Dimitri Aerden; Hannes Devos; Gert Van Gompel; Pieter Thomas Boonen; Koenraad Nieboer; Tim Leiner; Johan de Mey Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Thomas Werncke; Kristina Imeen Ringe; Christian von Falck; Martin Kruschewski; Frank Wacker; Bernhard Christian Meyer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alexandra Preuß; Lars-Arne Schaafs; Thomas Werncke; Ingo G Steffen; Bernd Hamm; Thomas Elgeti Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-04-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Barbora Horehledova; Casper Mihl; Gianluca Milanese; Rutger Brans; Nienke G Eijsvoogel; Babs M F Hendriks; Joachim E Wildberger; Marco Das Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2018-05-22 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Li Qi; Felix G Meinel; Chang Sheng Zhou; Yan E Zhao; U Joseph Schoepf; Long Jiang Zhang; Guang Ming Lu Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-10 Impact factor: 3.240