Literature DB >> 24917776

Novel use of the capio urethral anastomotic suturing device: a 50-case assessment.

Elleson A Schurtz1, Jhanelle Markes1, Mark R Newton1, James A Brown1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Robotic laparoscopic assisted prostatectomy (RALP) has become the predominant technique for prostatectomy despite significant expense and no robust evidence supporting better cancer control, erectile function, or continence. Several studies have demonstrated lower bladder neck contracture (BNC) rates with RALP, believed to be related to improved visualization and control of the urethrovesical anastomosis. We evaluated the Capio™ radical prostatectomy (RP) suture capturing device for improving anastomotic precision during urethrovesical anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review on a single-surgeon series of 50 consecutive patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) with utilization of the Capio™ RP device at an academic hospital (February 2010 to May 2012). Patient demographics, pathology, and outcomes data including rates of anastomotic leak, BNC, erectile function, and continence were collected.
RESULTS: Mean age of patients at the time of procedure was 60.4 ± 6.43 years. Patients were stratifed by D'Amico criteria into low (14.3%), intermediate (67.4%), and high (18.4%) risk groups. Mean follow-up for all patients was 13.1 ± 7.29 months. No patients were diagnosed with BNC within 90 days after surgery. Two patients (4%) were subsequently diagnosed and treated for BNC, one of whom was asymptomatic prior to diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: Utilizing the Capio™ RP device during RRP, we were able to achieve a BNC rate equivalent to rates reported for RALP. Use of the Capio™ RP device appears to be a cost-effective method for improving RRP urethrovesical anastomotic results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost effectiveness; Instrumentation; Prostatectomy

Year:  2014        PMID: 24917776      PMCID: PMC4024503          DOI: 10.1159/000356267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol        ISSN: 1661-7649


  14 in total

1.  Comparative hospital cost-analysis of open and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tomaszewski; Jarred C Matchett; Benjamin J Davies; Stephen V Jackman; Ronald L Hrebinko; Joel B Nelson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Bladder neck contracture after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Dler Besarani; Peter Amoroso; Roger Kirby
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Incidence of bladder neck contracture after robot-assisted laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Benjamin N Breyer; Cole B Davis; Janet E Cowan; Christopher J Kane; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Anastomotic strictures following radical prostatectomy: insights into incidence, effectiveness of intervention, effect on continence, and factors predisposing to occurrence.

Authors:  R Park; S Martin; J D Goldberg; H Lepor
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Temporal trends in radical prostatectomy complications from 1991 to 1998.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Karen F Gold; Chris L Pashos; Shilpa S Mehta; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Pelvic lymphadenectomy with modified radical retropubic prostatectomy as a single operation: technique used and results in 50 consecutive cases.

Authors:  A W Middleton
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies.

Authors:  W J Catalona; G F Carvalhal; D E Mager; D S Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Patient-reported complications and follow-up treatment after radical prostatectomy. The National Medicare Experience: 1988-1990 (updated June 1993).

Authors:  F J Fowler; M J Barry; G Lu-Yao; A Roman; J Wasson; J E Wennberg
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Xiangmei Gu; Stuart R Lipsitz; Michael J Barry; Anthony V D'Amico; Aaron C Weinberg; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Bladder neck contracture after retropubic radical prostatectomy: incidence and risk factors from a large single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Bradley A Erickson; Joshua J Meeks; Kimberly A Roehl; Christopher M Gonzalez; William J Catalona
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  1 in total

1.  Bladder Neck Contracture Following Radical Retropubic versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Benjamin L Spector; Nathan A Brooks; Michael E Strigenz; James A Brown
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2017-07-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.