Literature DB >> 8256394

Patient-reported complications and follow-up treatment after radical prostatectomy. The National Medicare Experience: 1988-1990 (updated June 1993).

F J Fowler1, M J Barry, G Lu-Yao, A Roman, J Wasson, J E Wennberg.   

Abstract

To estimate the probabilities of complications and follow-up treatment, a sample of Medicare patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (1988 through 1990) was surveyed by mail, telephone, and personal interview. Respondents reported their current status with respect to continence and sexual function as well as post-surgical treatments they had had to treat residual or recurrent cancer or surgical complications. Over 30 percent reported currently wearing pads or clamps to deal with wetness; over 40 percent said they drip urine when they cough or when their bladders are full; 23 percent reported daily wetting of more than a few drops. About 60 percent of patients reported having no full or partial erections since their surgery, and only 11 percent had any erections sufficient for intercourse during the month prior to the survey. Six percent had surgery after the radical prostatectomy to treat incontinence; 15 percent had treatments or used devices to help with sexual function; 20 percent report having had post-surgical treatment for urethral strictures. In addition 16 percent, 22 percent, and 28 percent reported follow-up treatment for cancer (radiation or androgen deprivation therapy) at two, three, and four years after radical prostatectomy. These estimates of complication and follow-up treatment rates are generally higher, and almost certainly more representative for older men, than estimates previously published. Patients and physicians may want to weight heavily the complications and need for follow-up treatments when considering radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8256394     DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(93)90524-e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  73 in total

1.  Early detection and aggressive treatment of prostate cancer: groping in the dark.

Authors:  M J Barry
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: published series.

Authors:  András Hoznek; David B Samadi; Laurent Salomon; Alexandre De La Taille; Leif E Olsson; Clément-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Clinical impact of 18F-choline PET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jan D Soyka; Marco A Muster; Daniel T Schmid; Burkhardt Seifert; Ulrike Schick; Raymond Miralbell; Sandra Jorcano; Kathrin Zaugg; Hans-Helge Seifert; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Klaus Strobel; Niklaus G Schaefer; Daniela B Husarik; Thomas F Hany
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Diabetes mellitus and health-related quality of life in prostate cancer: 5-year results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.

Authors:  Melissa S Y Thong; Lonneke van de Poll-Franse; Richard M Hoffman; Peter C Albertsen; Ann S Hamilton; Janet L Stanford; David F Penson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Oral selenium supplementation has no effect on prostate-specific antigen velocity in men undergoing active surveillance for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Suzanne Stratton; Amit M Algotar; James Ranger-Moore; Steven P Stratton; Elizabeth H Slate; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Patricia A Thompson; Larry C Clark; Frederick R Ahmann
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-07-20

Review 6.  Research Needs for Understanding the Biology of Overdiagnosis in Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Sudhir Srivastava; Brian J Reid; Sharmistha Ghosh; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 6.384

7.  Acute urinary morbidity following I-125 prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Toshio Ohashi; Atsunori Yorozu; Kazuhito Toya; Shiro Saito; Tetsuo Momma
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Selecting candidates for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  H Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2000

9.  Comparison of Incontinence Risk after Radical Prostatectomy versus Hysterectomy.

Authors:  W W Leng; M B Chancellor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2001

10.  Prostate cancer screening (United States).

Authors:  J W Waterbor; A J Bueschen
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.