Literature DB >> 28878598

Bladder Neck Contracture Following Radical Retropubic versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy.

Benjamin L Spector1, Nathan A Brooks1, Michael E Strigenz1, James A Brown1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) are co-standard surgical therapies for localized prostatic adenocarcinoma. These surgical modalities offer similar outcomes; however, lower rate of bladder neck contracture (BNC) is amongst the touted benefits of RALP. The differences between approaches are largely elucidated through multiple-surgeon comparisons, which can be biased by differential experience and practice patterns. We aimed to eliminate inter-surgeon bias through this single-surgeon comparison of BNC rates following RRP and RALP.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all RRPs and RALPs performed by one surgeon over 4 years. We compared clinical characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.
RESULTS: RRP patients had more advanced cancer and a higher biochemical recurrence rate. No significant differences were noted between groups in rates of anastomotic leakage, BNC, or 12-month postoperative pad-free continence.
CONCLUSION: RRP offers similar outcomes to RALP with regard to postoperative urinary extravasation, urinary continence, and BNC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder neck contracture; Prostatic adenocarcinoma; Radical retropubic prostatectomy; Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

Year:  2017        PMID: 28878598      PMCID: PMC5582497          DOI: 10.1159/000447169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol        ISSN: 1661-7649


  22 in total

Review 1.  Critical comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open radical prostatectomy: techniques, outcomes, and cost.

Authors:  Matthew T Gettman; Michael L Blute
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Surgery-related complications in 1253 robot-assisted and 485 open retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden.

Authors:  Stefan Carlsson; Andreas E Nilsson; Martin C Schumacher; Martin N Jonsson; Daniela S Volz; Gunnar Steineck; Peter N Wiklund
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Early complication rates in a single-surgeon series of 2500 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies: report applying a standardized grading system.

Authors:  Rafael F Coelho; Kenneth J Palmer; Bernardo Rocco; Ravendra R Moniz; Sanket Chauhan; Marcelo A Orvieto; Geoff Coughlin; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  What is the long-term relevance of clinically detected postoperative anastomotic urine leakage after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy?

Authors:  David A Rebuck; Samuel Haywood; Kelly McDermott; Kent T Perry; Robert B Nadler
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation.

Authors:  Kevin C Zorn; Ofer N Gofrit; Marcelo A Orvieto; Albert A Mikhail; Gregory P Zagaja; Arieh L Shalhav
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  An analysis of the causes of bladder neck contracture after open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  David R Webb; Kapil Sethi; Kiera Gee
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 7.  Minimally invasive approaches to prostate cancer: a review of the current literature.

Authors:  Ari Abraham Hakimi; Marc Feder; Reza Ghavamian
Journal:  Urol J       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.510

8.  Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; R Whittington; S B Malkowicz; D Schultz; K Blank; G A Broderick; J E Tomaszewski; A A Renshaw; I Kaplan; C J Beard; A Wein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-09-16       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; David S DiMarco; Laureano J Rangel; Eric J Bergstralh; Robert P Myers; Michael L Blute; Matthew T Gettman
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Is a cystogram necessary after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Khurshid A Guru; Phillip J Seereiter; John P Sfakianos; Alan D Hutson; James L Mohler
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 3.498

View more
  4 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted perineal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy: A matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Volkan Tuğcu; Oktay Akça; Abdulmuttalip Şimşek; İsmail Yiğitbaşı; Selçuk Şahin; Mustafa Gürkan Yenice; Ali İhsan Taşçı
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-04-03

Review 2.  Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis, cumulative analysis, and systematic review.

Authors:  Karthik Tanneru; Seyed Behzad Jazayeri; Jatinder Kumar; Muhammad Umar Alam; Daniel Norez; Sabine Nguyen; Soroush Bazargani; Hariharan Palayapalayam Ganapathi; Mark Bandyk; Robert Marino; Shahriar Koochekpour; Shiva Gautam; K C Balaji; Joseph Costa
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-11-22

3.  Comparison of robotic and open radical prostatectomy: Initial experience of a single surgeon.

Authors:  Adnan Simsir; Fuat Kizilay; Bayram Aliyev; Serdar Kalemci
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

4.  Minimal invasive management of bladder neck contracture using Allium round posterior stent: the long-term results.

Authors:  Kerem Teke; Efe Bosnali; Onder Kara; Murat Ustuner; Ibrahim E Avci; Mustafa M Culha
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2021-05-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.