| Literature DB >> 24913827 |
Wanlu Song, Yajuan Qin, Yan Zhu, Guangjun Yin, Ningning Wu, Yaxuan Li, Yingkao Hu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The caleosin genes encode proteins with a single conserved EF hand calcium-binding domain and comprise small gene families found in a wide range of plant species. These proteins may be involved in many cellular and biological processes coupled closely to the synthesis, degradation, or stability of oil bodies. Although previous studies of this protein family have been reported for Arabidopsis and other species, understanding of the evolution of the caleosin gene family in plants remains inadequate.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24913827 PMCID: PMC4057654 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Phylogenetic relationships, exon-intron structure, and motif structures of caleosin genes. (A) The neighbor-joining (N-J) phylogenetic tree was constructed based on a complete protein sequence alignment of 84 caleosin genes identified using Clustal X and MEGA5. Numbers at the nodes represent bootstrap support (1000 replicates). The color of subclades indicates the five corresponding gene subfamilies. (B) Exon-intron structures of the caleosin genes. Boxes: exons; lines: introns. The lengths of boxes and lines are scaled based on gene length. (C) MEME motif search results. Conserved motifs are indicated in numbered color boxes.
Figure 2Venn diagram of Type-I and Type-II amino acid sites related to functional divergence, and positively selected sites. All sites are positioned on the reference sequence (AtCLO5) based on sequence alignment.
Estimates of the dates for the segmental duplication events of caleosin gene family
| 0.455 ± 0.105 | 35.0 | 30-40 | Vandepoele et al., 2003
[ | ||
| 0.169 ± 0.072 | 13.9 | 13, 59 | Schmutz et al., 2010
[ | ||
| 0.163 ± 0.055 | 13.4 | | | ||
| 0.712 ± 0.182 | 23.7 | 28-48 | Ermolaeva et al., 2003
[ | ||
| 0.712 ± 0.112 | 23.7 | | | ||
| 0.348 ± 0.144 | 19.1 | 8-13 | Tuskan et al., 2006
[ | ||
| 0.810 ± 0.048 | 28.9 | 13-17 | Town et al., 2006
[ | ||
| 0.363 ± 0.798 | 12.9 | | | ||
| 0.453 ± 0.204 | 16.2 | | | ||
| 0.753 ± 0.059 | 26.9 | | | ||
| 0.400 ± 0.160 | 14.3 | | | ||
| 0.353 ± 0.095 | 12.6 | ||||
4DTv distance between paralogous genes
| 0.399 | |||
| 0.414 | |||
| 0.206 | |||
| 0.072 | |||
| 0.229 | |||
| 0.039 | |||
| 0.235 | |||
| 0.138 | |||
| 0.189 | |||
Functional divergence between groups of the caleosin subfamily
| I | II | 0.418 ± 0.188 | 4.96* | 2 | 0 | -0.078 ± 0.449 | 0 |
| I | III | 0.532 ± 0.477 | 1.25 | 0 | 0 | -0.278 ± 0.436 | 0 |
| I | IV | 0.914 ± 0.156 | 34.4** | 36 | 24 | 0.054 ± 0.448 | 7 |
| I | V | 0.418 ± 0.219 | 3.64 | 1 | 1 | -0.343 ± 0.459 | 0 |
| II | III | 0.386 ± 0.332 | 1.36 | 0 | 0 | 0.112 ± 0.241 | 8 |
| II | IV | 0.993 ± 0.173 | 32.8** | 38 | 38 | 0.088 ± 0.342 | 8 |
| II | V | 0.967 ± 0.316 | 9.39** | 38 | 38 | 0.027 ± 0.283 | 6 |
| III | IV | 0.001 ± 0.022 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | -0.192 ± 0.324 | 0 |
| III | V | 0.253 ± 0.287 | 0.78 | 0 | 0 | -0.212 ± 0.245 | 0 |
| IV | V | 0.242 ± 0.205 | 1.40 | 0 | 0 | -0.163 ± 0.339 | 0 |
Note: θI and θII, the coefficients of Type-I and Type-II functional divergence between two gene clusters; LRT, Likelihood Ratio Statistic, for p < 0.05 was marked by *p < 0.01 was marked by **Qk, posterior probability. Large Qk value indicates a high possibility that the functional constraint (or the evolutionary rate) or the physicochemical properties of a given amino acid site is different between two clusters.
Figure 3Multiple sequence alignment of caleosin protein sequences. The positions of the motif 6, a calcium-binding motif, a proline knot-like motif, and four phosphorylation sites (one tyrosine kinase and three casein kinase II phosphorylation sites) are indicated on the tops of the sequences. The two invariable proline residues in the proline knot-like motif are labeled by black boxes, two His sites and two Cys sites of dissulfide bridge are highlighted by red and blue frames, respectively. The consensus sequence of the phosphorylation sites are marked by upper lines with the potential phosphorylated residue pointed by arrows. The critical amino acid sites of functional divergence, adaptive selection and coevolution are marked by red triangles, blue circles, and purple stars, respectively.
Log-likehood values and parameter estimates of caleosins under site-specific models
| M0 (one-ratio) | -4930.58 | | ω = 0.12741 | None |
| M3 (discrete) | -4866.93 | 127.29** (M0vsM3) | p0 = 0.05223, p1 = 0.37093 p2 = 0.57684, ω0 = 0.00000 ω1 = 0.06189, ω2 = 0.19751 | None |
| M7 (beta) | -4855.75 | | p = 1.18755, q = 7.11704 | Not allowed |
| M8 (beta&ω) | -5816.87 | 1922.25** (M7vsM8) | p0 = 0.99999, p = 0.95936 q = 1.53716, p1 = 0.00001 ω = 2.94912 | 70R** 74G** 88 L** 89G 100K** 106A 107S** |
Note: p < 0.05 was marked by *p < 0.01 were marked by **;
ω: The substitution rate ratios of non-synonymous (dN or Ka) versus synonymous (dS or Ks) mutations.
Codon (amino acid) positions presented above are based on the AtCLO5 gene.