Literature DB >> 21458784

MRI of asymptomatic patients with metal-on-metal and polyethylene-on-metal total hip arthroplasties.

A Mistry1, J Cahir, S T Donell, J Nolan, A P Toms.   

Abstract

AIMS: To define and compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of asymptomatic patients with metal-on-metal (MOM) and polyethylene-on-metal (POM) total hip replacements (THRs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two THRs in 20 asymptomatic patients (seven men, 13 women, mean age 68 years, range 47-86 years) with normal hip radiographs were included in the study. These comprised 10 POM and 12 MOM bearings. Each patient underwent MRI with metal artefact reduction sequences (MARS) at a mean time of 46 months (POM) and 70 months (MOM) after surgery. Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently read each MRI examination for fluid collections, soft-tissue masses, muscle atrophy, and bone marrow signal changes.
RESULTS: A pre-MRI hip radiograph showed no significant differences from the postoperative radiograph regarding acetabular inclination, femoral stem angle, and stem mantle grade. There were eight periprosthetic collections (one POM, seven MOM). The majority of THRs had normal gluteal muscles. The ipsilateral piriformis and obturator internus muscles were more frequently abnormal in the MOM group. Overall, there were no significant differences in the number of abnormalities between the two types of bearings.
CONCLUSION: A range of MRI abnormalities are present in normal asymptomatic THRs but the increased frequency of these associated with MOM THR suggest that some of these changes might represent subclinical disease.
Copyright © 2011 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21458784     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  7 in total

Review 1.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of post-operative complications following hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Douis; D J Dunlop; A M Pearson; J N O'Hara; S L J James
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of painful metal-on-metal total hip replacement.

Authors:  Vassilios S Nikolaou; Alain Petit; Viviane Khoury; Etienne Blain-Pare; David J Zukor; Olga L Huk; John Antoniou
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-06-07

3.  [MRI investigations in patients with problems due to metal-on-metal implants].

Authors:  T M Parsons; K Satchithananda; R Berbe; I A Siddiqui; E Robinson; A J Hart; A Hart
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Repeated magnetic resonance imaging in 154 hips with large-diameter metal-on-metal hip replacement.

Authors:  Aleksi Reito; Petra Elo; Timo Puolakka; Jorma Pajamäki; Jyrki Nieminen; Antti Eskelinen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Gluteal muscle fatty atrophy is not associated with elevated blood metal ions or pseudotumors in patients with a unilateral metal-on-metal hip replacement.

Authors:  Aleksi Reito; Petra Elo; Jyrki Nieminen; Timo Puolakka; Antti Eskelinen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Reliability of slice-encoding for metal artefact correction (SEMAC) MRI to identify prosthesis loosening in patients with painful total hip arthroplasty - a single centre, prospective, surgical validation study.

Authors:  Tsuneari Takahashi; Siddharth Thaker; Giovanni Lettieri; Anthony Redmond; Michael R Backhouse; Martin Stone; Hemant Pandit; Philip O'Connor
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 7.  Imaging Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements: the Norwich Experience.

Authors:  Marianna S Thomas; James A Wimhurst; John F Nolan; Andoni P Toms
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-08-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.