Literature DB >> 25985878

National trends in therapeutic approaches and outcomes for pediatric appendicitis: a Taiwanese nationwide cohort study.

Chih-Cheng Luo1, Wen-Kuei Chien, Chen-Sheng Huang, Hung-Chang Huang, Carlos Lam, Chin-Wang Hsu, Ray-Jade Chen, Kuang-Fu Cheng.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To define the pattern of therapeutic approaches for pediatric appendicitis and compare their benefits in Taiwan, we analyzed a research-oriented dataset released by the Bureau of National Health Insurance in Taiwan through the Collaboration Center for Health Information Application (CCHIA) to document the impact of the rise of laparoscopic treatment on outcomes.
METHODS: We identified 22,161 patients under 18 years who had been hospitalized with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis between 2007 and 2012 in the CCHIA. Statistical comparisons between the Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA, control) groups were computed using a Chi squared test. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of risk factors for intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) and postoperative bowel obstruction (PBO) were derived from multivariate logistic regression models.
RESULTS: In each respective year, the incidence of LA increased from 29.17% in 2007 to 57.4% in 2012, while that of OA decreased from 70.83% in 2007 to 42.60% in 2012; incidences of non-perforated appendicitis and perforated appendicitis with LA or OA seemed similar. The length of hospitalization between an LA and OA for non-perforated appendicitis was the same, but that with an LA was shorter for perforated appendicitis. The adjusted ORs for IAA and PBO for those patients with perforated and non-perforated appendicitis were 6.30 (95% CI = 5.09-7.78; p < 0.001) and 6.49 (95% CI = 4.45-9.48; p < 0.001); while for those cases undergoing an LA and OA, they were 0.50 (95 % CI = 0.40-0.62; p < 0.001) and 2.07 (95% CI = 1.45-2.95; p < 0.001), respectively. The ORs of IAA and PBO for those patients ≤6 and 7-12 years of age were 1.67 (95% CI = 1.23-2.25; p = 0.001) and 1.20 (95% CI = 0.97-1.49; p = 0.095), and 1.88 (95% CI = 1.08-3.24; p = 0.025) and 1.47 (95% CI = 1.01-2.14; p = 0.043), respectively, compared to those aged 13-18 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that young age and perforated appendicitis can affect postoperative IAA and PBO. LA appeared beneficial in reducing the length of hospitalization and postoperative IAA, but had an increasing risk of PBO. Although laparoscopic approach for pediatric appendectomy is increasing in our country, the different hospital levels and pediatric surgeon's laparoscopic experience must be evaluated in further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25985878     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-015-3718-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  24 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  Heng-Fu Lin; Jiann-Ming Wu; Li-Ming Tseng; Kuo-Hsin Chen; Shih-Horng Huang; I-Rue Lai
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy: pros & cons--literature review of 4190 cases.

Authors:  B P Hermans; J B Otte
Journal:  Acta Chir Belg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.090

3.  Patient selection and the volume effect in pancreatic surgery: unequal benefits?

Authors:  Lindsay A Bliss; Catherine J Yang; Zeling Chau; Sing Chau Ng; David W McFadden; Tara S Kent; A James Moser; Mark P Callery; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in children: outcomes comparison based on age, sex, and perforation status.

Authors:  Steven L Lee; Arezou Yaghoubian; Amy Kaji
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2011-06-20

5.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Eric D Peterson; Steve Eubanks; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  J Herman; M Duda; M Lovecek; I Svach
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

7.  Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy in children: another opinion.

Authors:  Chien-Hsing Lee; Yu-Li Lin
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun

8.  Laparoscopic appendectomy: burden or benefit? A single-center experience.

Authors:  Firas Shalak; Saad I Almulhim; Saleem Ghantous; Salam Yazbeck
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.878

9.  Laparoscopy in children with complicated appendicitis.

Authors:  Hannu Lintula; Hannu Kokki; Kari Vanamo; Pentti Antila; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  A comparative study of routine laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.

Authors:  Jamy L Yong; Wai Lun Law; Chung Yau Lo; Chi Ming Lam
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  3 in total

1.  Association of Health Care Utilization With Rates of Perforated Appendicitis in Children 18 Years or Younger.

Authors:  Katherine J Baxter; Hannah T M H Nguyen; Mark L Wulkan; Mehul V Raval
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Statins improve outcomes of nonsurgical curative treatments in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Li-Li Wu; Mao-Chih Hsieh; Jyh-Ming Chow; Shing-Hwa Liu; Chia-Lun Chang; Szu-Yuan Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Role of Laparoscopic Appendectomy Radix Ligation Techniques on the Formation of Inner Abdomen Abscess.

Authors:  Ömer Avlanmış; Rıza Gürhan Işıl; Adnan Nadir Hacim; Hakan Teoman Yanar
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2018-09-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.