Literature DB >> 17062860

Disparities in the utilization of high-volume hospitals for complex surgery.

Jerome H Liu1, David S Zingmond, Marcia L McGory, Nelson F SooHoo, Susan L Ettner, Robert H Brook, Clifford Y Ko.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Referral to high-volume hospitals has been recommended for operations with a demonstrated volume-outcome relationship. The characteristics of patients who receive care at low-volume hospitals may be different from those of patients who receive care at high-volume hospitals. These differences may limit their ability to access or receive care at a high-volume hospital.
OBJECTIVE: To identify patient characteristics associated with the use of high-volume hospitals, using California's Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development patient discharge database. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective study of Californians receiving the following inpatient operations from 2000 through 2004: elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, coronary artery bypass grafting, carotid endarterectomy, esophageal cancer resection, hip fracture repair, lung cancer resection, cardiac valve replacement, coronary angioplasty, pancreatic cancer resection, and total knee replacement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient race/ethnicity and insurance status in high-volume (highest 20% of patients by mean annual volume) and in low-volume (lowest 20%) hospitals.
RESULTS: A total of 719,608 patients received 1 of the 10 operations. Overall, nonwhites, Medicaid patients, and uninsured patients were less likely to receive care at high-volume hospitals and more likely to receive care at low-volume hospitals when controlling for other patient-level characteristics. Blacks were significantly (P<.05) less likely than whites to receive care at high-volume hospitals for 6 of the 10 operations (relative risk [RR] range, 0.40-0.72), while Asians and Hispanics were significantly less likely to receive care at high-volume hospitals for 5 (RR range, 0.60-0.91) and 9 (RR range, 0.46-0.88), respectively. Medicaid patients were significantly less likely than Medicare patients to receive care at high-volume hospitals for 7 of the operations (RR range, 0.22-0.66), while uninsured patients were less likely to be treated at high-volume hospitals for 9 (RR range, 0.20-0.81).
CONCLUSIONS: There are substantial disparities in the characteristics of patients receiving care at high-volume hospitals. The interest in selective referral to high-volume hospitals should include explicit efforts to identify the patient and system factors required to reduce current inequities regarding their use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17062860     DOI: 10.1001/jama.296.16.1973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  126 in total

Review 1.  What is quality, and can we define it in lung cancer?-the case for quality improvement.

Authors:  Farhood Farjah; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

2.  Superior outcomes for rural patients after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair supports a systematic regional approach to abdominal aortic aneurysm care.

Authors:  Matthew W Mell; Christie Bartels; Amy Kind; Glen Leverson; Maureen Smith
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 3.  Cardiovascular health disparities: a systematic review of health care interventions.

Authors:  Andrew M Davis; Lisa M Vinci; Tochi M Okwuosa; Ayana R Chase; Elbert S Huang
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Minimizing disparities in surgical care: a research focus for the future.

Authors:  Joan J Ryoo; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Association of hospital volume with conditional 90-day mortality after cystectomy: an analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Matthew E Nielsen; Katherine Mallin; Mark A Weaver; Bryan Palis; Andrew Stewart; David P Winchester; Matthew I Milowsky
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Evaluation of centers of excellence program for knee and hip replacement.

Authors:  Ateev Mehrotra; Elizabeth M Sloss; Peter S Hussey; John L Adams; Susan Lovejoy; Nelson F Soohoo
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Mortality increases when radical cystectomy is delayed more than 12 weeks: results from a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare analysis.

Authors:  John L Gore; Julie Lai; Claude M Setodji; Mark S Litwin; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Variations in referral patterns for hypophysectomies among pediatric patients with sellar and parasellar tumors.

Authors:  Debraj Mukherjee; Hasan A Zaidi; Thomas A Kosztowski; Aditya Halthore; George I Jallo; Roberto Salvatori; David C Chang; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 1.475

9.  Variations in referral patterns to high-volume centers for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  David C Chang; Yiyi Zhang; Debraj Mukherjee; Christopher L Wolfgang; Richard D Schulick; John L Cameron; Nita Ahuja
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Multimodal cancer care in poor prognosis cancers: Resection drives long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Mark A Healy; Huiying Yin; Sandra L Wong
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.