Literature DB >> 24904165

Defining an essential transcription factor program for naïve pluripotency.

S-J Dunn1, G Martello2, B Yordanov1, S Emmott1, A G Smith2,3.   

Abstract

The gene regulatory circuitry through which pluripotent embryonic stem (ES) cells choose between self-renewal and differentiation appears vast and has yet to be distilled into an executive molecular program. We developed a data-constrained, computational approach to reduce complexity and to derive a set of functionally validated components and interaction combinations sufficient to explain observed ES cell behavior. This minimal set, the simplest version of which comprises only 16 interactions, 12 components, and three inputs, satisfies all prior specifications for self-renewal and furthermore predicts unknown and nonintuitive responses to compound genetic perturbations with an overall accuracy of 70%. We propose that propagation of ES cell identity is not determined by a vast interactome but rather can be explained by a relatively simple process of molecular computation.
Copyright © 2014, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24904165      PMCID: PMC4257066          DOI: 10.1126/science.1248882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  18 in total

Review 1.  Stem cell states, fates, and the rules of attraction.

Authors:  Tariq Enver; Martin Pera; Carsten Peterson; Peter W Andrews
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 24.633

2.  Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells.

Authors:  H Niwa; J Miyazaki; A G Smith
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Oct4 and LIF/Stat3 additively induce Krüppel factors to sustain embryonic stem cell self-renewal.

Authors:  John Hall; Ge Guo; Jason Wray; Isobel Eyres; Jennifer Nichols; Lars Grotewold; Sofia Morfopoulou; Peter Humphreys; William Mansfield; Rachael Walker; Simon Tomlinson; Austin Smith
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 24.633

4.  An Oct4-centered protein interaction network in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Debbie L C van den Berg; Tim Snoek; Nick P Mullin; Adam Yates; Karel Bezstarosti; Jeroen Demmers; Ian Chambers; Raymond A Poot
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 24.633

5.  Heparan sulfation-dependent fibroblast growth factor signaling maintains embryonic stem cells primed for differentiation in a heterogeneous state.

Authors:  Fredrik Lanner; Kian Leong Lee; Marcus Sohl; Katarina Holmborn; Henry Yang; Johannes Wilbertz; Lorenz Poellinger; Janet Rossant; Filip Farnebo
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.277

6.  Gbx2, a LIF/Stat3 target, promotes reprogramming to and retention of the pluripotent ground state.

Authors:  Chih-I Tai; Qi-Long Ying
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 7.  Pluripotency in the embryo and in culture.

Authors:  Jennifer Nichols; Austin Smith
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 10.005

8.  The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal.

Authors:  Qi-Long Ying; Jason Wray; Jennifer Nichols; Laura Batlle-Morera; Bradley Doble; James Woodgett; Philip Cohen; Austin Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Esrrb is a pivotal target of the Gsk3/Tcf3 axis regulating embryonic stem cell self-renewal.

Authors:  Graziano Martello; Toshimi Sugimoto; Evangelia Diamanti; Anagha Joshi; Rebecca Hannah; Satoshi Ohtsuka; Berthold Göttgens; Hitoshi Niwa; Austin Smith
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 24.633

10.  Nanog is the gateway to the pluripotent ground state.

Authors:  Jose Silva; Jennifer Nichols; Thorold W Theunissen; Ge Guo; Anouk L van Oosten; Ornella Barrandon; Jason Wray; Shinya Yamanaka; Ian Chambers; Austin Smith
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  154 in total

1.  Network plasticity of pluripotency transcription factors in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Adam Filipczyk; Carsten Marr; Simon Hastreiter; Justin Feigelman; Michael Schwarzfischer; Philipp S Hoppe; Dirk Loeffler; Konstantinos D Kokkaliaris; Max Endele; Bernhard Schauberger; Oliver Hilsenbeck; Stavroula Skylaki; Jan Hasenauer; Konstantinos Anastassiadis; Fabian J Theis; Timm Schroeder
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 2.  Hallmarks of pluripotency.

Authors:  Alejandro De Los Angeles; Francesco Ferrari; Ruibin Xi; Yuko Fujiwara; Nissim Benvenisty; Hongkui Deng; Konrad Hochedlinger; Rudolf Jaenisch; Soohyun Lee; Harry G Leitch; M William Lensch; Ernesto Lujan; Duanqing Pei; Janet Rossant; Marius Wernig; Peter J Park; George Q Daley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Foxd3 Promotes Exit from Naive Pluripotency through Enhancer Decommissioning and Inhibits Germline Specification.

Authors:  Patricia Respuela; Miloš Nikolić; Minjia Tan; Peter Frommolt; Yingming Zhao; Joanna Wysocka; Alvaro Rada-Iglesias
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 24.633

4.  Isolation and cultivation of naive-like human pluripotent stem cells based on HERVH expression.

Authors:  Jichang Wang; Manvendra Singh; Chuanbo Sun; Daniel Besser; Alessandro Prigione; Zoltán Ivics; Laurence D Hurst; Zsuzsanna Izsvák
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Inference of cell type specific regulatory networks on mammalian lineages.

Authors:  Deborah Chasman; Sushmita Roy
Journal:  Curr Opin Syst Biol       Date:  2017-04-17

6.  G1 cyclins link proliferation, pluripotency and differentiation of embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Lijun Liu; Wojciech Michowski; Hiroyuki Inuzuka; Kouhei Shimizu; Naoe Taira Nihira; Joel M Chick; Na Li; Yan Geng; Alice Y Meng; Alban Ordureau; Aleksandra Kołodziejczyk; Keith L Ligon; Roderick T Bronson; Kornelia Polyak; J Wade Harper; Steven P Gygi; Wenyi Wei; Piotr Sicinski
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 28.824

7.  m(6)A RNA modification controls cell fate transition in mammalian embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Pedro J Batista; Benoit Molinie; Jinkai Wang; Kun Qu; Jiajing Zhang; Lingjie Li; Donna M Bouley; Ernesto Lujan; Bahareh Haddad; Kaveh Daneshvar; Ava C Carter; Ryan A Flynn; Chan Zhou; Kok-Seong Lim; Peter Dedon; Marius Wernig; Alan C Mullen; Yi Xing; Cosmas C Giallourakis; Howard Y Chang
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 24.633

8.  Logical modeling of lymphoid and myeloid cell specification and transdifferentiation.

Authors:  Samuel Collombet; Chris van Oevelen; Jose Luis Sardina Ortega; Wassim Abou-Jaoudé; Bruno Di Stefano; Morgane Thomas-Chollier; Thomas Graf; Denis Thieffry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The gene regulatory network of mESC differentiation: a benchmark for reverse engineering methods.

Authors:  Johannes Meisig; Nils Blüthgen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  First critical repressive H3K27me3 marks in embryonic stem cells identified using designed protein inhibitor.

Authors:  James D Moody; Shiri Levy; Julie Mathieu; Yalan Xing; Woojin Kim; Cheng Dong; Wolfram Tempel; Aaron M Robitaille; Luke T Dang; Amy Ferreccio; Damien Detraux; Sonia Sidhu; Licheng Zhu; Lauren Carter; Chao Xu; Cristina Valensisi; Yuliang Wang; R David Hawkins; Jinrong Min; Randall T Moon; Stuart H Orkin; David Baker; Hannele Ruohola-Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.