Literature DB >> 19427289

Stem cell states, fates, and the rules of attraction.

Tariq Enver1, Martin Pera, Carsten Peterson, Peter W Andrews.   

Abstract

Understanding cell-fate decisions in stem cell populations is a major goal of modern biology. Stem and progenitor cell populations are often heterogeneous, which may reflect stem cell subsets that express subtly different properties, including different propensities for lineage selection upon differentiation, yet remain able to interconvert. We discuss these properties with examples both from the hematopoietic and embryonic stem cell (ESC) systems. The nature of the stem cell substates and their relationship to commitment to differentiate and lineage selection can be elucidated in terms of a landscape picture in which stable states can be defined mathematically as attractors.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19427289     DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Stem Cell        ISSN: 1875-9777            Impact factor:   24.633


  143 in total

1.  Proteomic cornerstones of hematopoietic stem cell differentiation: distinct signatures of multipotent progenitors and myeloid committed cells.

Authors:  Daniel Klimmeck; Jenny Hansson; Simon Raffel; Sergey Y Vakhrushev; Andreas Trumpp; Jeroen Krijgsveld
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Defining pluripotency.

Authors:  Martin F Pera
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Network plasticity of pluripotency transcription factors in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Adam Filipczyk; Carsten Marr; Simon Hastreiter; Justin Feigelman; Michael Schwarzfischer; Philipp S Hoppe; Dirk Loeffler; Konstantinos D Kokkaliaris; Max Endele; Bernhard Schauberger; Oliver Hilsenbeck; Stavroula Skylaki; Jan Hasenauer; Konstantinos Anastassiadis; Fabian J Theis; Timm Schroeder
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 4.  The hematopoietic stem cell niche in homeostasis and disease.

Authors:  Laura M Calvi; Daniel C Link
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Path statistics, memory, and coarse-graining of continuous-time random walks on networks.

Authors:  Michael Manhart; Willow Kion-Crosby; Alexandre V Morozov
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Evidence for self-maintaining pluripotent murine stem cells in embryoid bodies.

Authors:  Wael A Attia; Osama M Abd El Aziz; Dimitry Spitkovsky; John A Gaspar; Peter Dröge; Frank Suhr; Davood Sabour; Johannes Winkler; Kesavan Meganathan; Smita Jagtap; Markus Khalil; Jürgen Hescheler
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.739

7.  An uphill battle toward pluripotency.

Authors:  Thomas Graf
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Self-renewing epiblast stem cells exhibit continual delineation of germ cells with epigenetic reprogramming in vitro.

Authors:  Katsuhiko Hayashi; M Azim Surani
Journal:  Development       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 9.  Forcing cells to change lineages.

Authors:  Thomas Graf; Tariq Enver
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Cellular reprogramming dynamics follow a simple 1D reaction coordinate.

Authors:  Sai Teja Pusuluri; Alex H Lang; Pankaj Mehta; Horacio E Castillo
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.