Literature DB >> 24890527

PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of chest pain: rationale and design of the PROMISE trial.

Pamela S Douglas1, Udo Hoffmann2, Kerry L Lee3, Daniel B Mark3, Hussein R Al-Khalidi3, Kevin Anstrom3, Rowena J Dolor3, Andrzej Kosinski3, Mitchell W Krucoff3, Daniel W Mudrick4, Manesh R Patel3, Michael H Picard2, James E Udelson5, Eric J Velazquez3, Lawton Cooper6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the most common, potentially life-threatening diagnostic problems clinicians encounter. However, no large outcome-based randomized trials have been performed to guide the selection of diagnostic strategies for these patients.
METHODS: The PROMISE study is a prospective, randomized trial comparing the effectiveness of 2 initial diagnostic strategies in patients with symptoms suspicious for CAD. Patients are randomized to either (1) functional testing (exercise electrocardiogram, stress nuclear imaging, or stress echocardiogram) or (2) anatomical testing with ≥64-slice multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography. Tests are interpreted locally in real time by subspecialty certified physicians, and all subsequent care decisions are made by the clinical care team. Sites are provided results of central core laboratory quality and completeness assessment. All subjects are followed up for ≥1 year. The primary end point is the time to occurrence of the composite of death, myocardial infarction, major procedural complications (stroke, major bleeding, anaphylaxis, and renal failure), or hospitalization for unstable angina.
RESULTS: More than 10,000 symptomatic subjects were randomized in 3.2 years at 193 US and Canadian cardiology, radiology, primary care, urgent care, and anesthesiology sites.
CONCLUSION: Multispecialty community practice enrollment into a large pragmatic trial of diagnostic testing strategies is both feasible and efficient. The PROMISE trial will compare the clinical effectiveness of an initial strategy of functional testing against an initial strategy of anatomical testing in symptomatic patients with suspected CAD. Quality of life, resource use, cost-effectiveness, and radiation exposure will be assessed.
Copyright © 2014 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24890527      PMCID: PMC4044617          DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  32 in total

1.  A global sensitivity analysis of performance of a medical diagnostic test when verification bias is present.

Authors:  Andrzej S Kosinski; Huiman X Barnhart
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Why all the focus on cardiac imaging?

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Thomas H Marwick; William A Zoghbi; W Gregory Hundley; Christopher M Kramer; Stephan Achenbach; Vasken Dilsizian; Morton J Kern; Y Chandrashekhar; Jagat Narula
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-07

Review 3.  Prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Edward A Hulten; Salvatore Carbonaro; Sara P Petrillo; Joshua D Mitchell; Todd C Villines
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  CT angiography: first things first.

Authors:  Michael S Lauer
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 7.792

5.  Non-invasive cardiac imaging technologies for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a summary of evidence-based analyses.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-06-01

6.  From adequate evidence to optimal evidence.

Authors:  Leslee Shaw; Jagat Narula
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-12

7.  A blood-based gene expression test for obstructive coronary artery disease tested in symptomatic nondiabetic patients referred for myocardial perfusion imaging the COMPASS study.

Authors:  Gregory S Thomas; Szilard Voros; John A McPherson; Alexandra J Lansky; Mary E Winn; Timothy M Bateman; Michael R Elashoff; Hsiao D Lieu; Andrea M Johnson; Susan E Daniels; Joseph A Ladapo; Charles E Phelps; Pamela S Douglas; Steven Rosenberg
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Genet       Date:  2013-02-15

8.  Outcomes research in cardiovascular imaging: report of a workshop sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Authors:  Pamela S Douglas; Allen Taylor; Diane Bild; Robert Bonow; Philip Greenland; Michael Lauer; Frank Peacock; James Udelson
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-07

9.  Temporal trends in the frequency of inducible myocardial ischemia during cardiac stress testing: 1991 to 2009.

Authors:  Alan Rozanski; Heidi Gransar; Sean W Hayes; James Min; John D Friedman; Louise E J Thomson; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Future directions for cardiovascular disease comparative effectiveness research: report of a workshop sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Authors:  Mark A Hlatky; Pamela S Douglas; Nakela L Cook; Barbara Wells; Emelia J Benjamin; Kay Dickersin; David C Goff; Alan T Hirsch; Elaine M Hylek; Eric D Peterson; Véronique L Roger; Joseph V Selby; James E Udelson; Michael S Lauer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  44 in total

1.  Identification of Patients With Stable Chest Pain Deriving Minimal Value From Noninvasive Testing: The PROMISE Minimal-Risk Tool, A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Christopher B Fordyce; Pamela S Douglas; Rhonda S Roberts; Udo Hoffmann; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Manesh R Patel; Christopher B Granger; John Kostis; Daniel B Mark; Kerry L Lee; James E Udelson
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  Sex Differences in Functional and CT Angiography Testing in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Neha J Pagidipati; Kshipra Hemal; Adrian Coles; Daniel B Mark; Rowena J Dolor; Patricia A Pellikka; Udo Hoffmann; Sheldon E Litwin; James Udelson; Melissa A Daubert; Svati H Shah; Beth Martinez; Kerry L Lee; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Multi-modality imaging: Bird's-eye view from the 2014 American Heart Association Scientific Sessions.

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; Andrew J Einstein; Farooq A Chaudhry; Steven G Lloyd; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Single-Molecule hsTnI and Short-Term Risk in Stable Patients With Chest Pain.

Authors:  James L Januzzi; Sunil Suchindran; Udo Hoffmann; Manesh R Patel; Maros Ferencik; Adrian Coles; Jean-Claude Tardif; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Central Core Laboratory versus Site Interpretation of Coronary CT Angiography: Agreement and Association with Cardiovascular Events in the PROMISE Trial.

Authors:  Michael T Lu; Nandini M Meyersohn; Thomas Mayrhofer; Daniel O Bittner; Hamed Emami; Stefan B Puchner; Borek Foldyna; Martin E Mueller; Steven Hearne; Clifford Yang; Stephan Achenbach; Quynh A Truong; Brian B Ghoshhajra; Manesh R Patel; Maros Ferencik; Pamela S Douglas; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  The External Validity of Prediction Models for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Stable Chest Pain: Insights From the PROMISE Trial.

Authors:  Tessa S S Genders; Adrian Coles; Udo Hoffmann; Manesh R Patel; Daniel B Mark; Kerry L Lee; Ewout W Steyerberg; M G Myriam Hunink; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-06-14

7.  Prognostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcium in the PROMISE Study (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain).

Authors:  Matthew J Budoff; Thomas Mayrhofer; Maros Ferencik; Daniel Bittner; Kerry L Lee; Michael T Lu; Adrian Coles; James Jang; Mayil Krishnam; Pamela S Douglas; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Comparison of visual assessment of coronary stenosis with independent quantitative coronary angiography: Findings from the Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) trial.

Authors:  Rohan Shah; Eric Yow; William Schuyler Jones; Louis P Kohl; Andrzej S Kosinski; Udo Hoffmann; Kerry L Lee; Christopher B Fordyce; Daniel B Mark; Alicia Lowe; Pamela S Douglas; Manesh R Patel
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 9.  Use of cardiac CT and calcium scoring for detecting coronary plaque: implications on prognosis and patient management.

Authors:  S Divakaran; M K Cheezum; E A Hulten; M S Bittencourt; M G Silverman; K Nasir; R Blankstein
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Clinical and Economic Implications of Inconclusive Noninvasive Test Results in Stable Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the PROMISE Trial.

Authors:  Akash Goyal; Neha Pagidipati; C Larry Hill; Brooke Alhanti; James E Udelson; Michael H Picard; Patricia A Pellikka; Udo Hoffmann; Daniel B Mark; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 7.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.