Christopher B Fordyce1,2, Pamela S Douglas2, Rhonda S Roberts2, Udo Hoffmann3, Hussein R Al-Khalidi2, Manesh R Patel2, Christopher B Granger2, John Kostis4, Daniel B Mark2, Kerry L Lee2, James E Udelson5. 1. Division of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 2. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. 3. Department of Radiology, Division of Cardiovascular Imaging and Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston. 4. Division of Cardiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey. 5. The CardioVascular Center, Division of Cardiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Importance: Guidelines recommend noninvasive testing for patients with stable chest pain, although many subsequently have normal test results and no adverse clinical events. Objective: To describe a risk tool developed to use only pretest clinical data to identify patients with chest pain with normal coronary arteries and no clinical events during follow-up (minimal-risk cohort). Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of a randomized, pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain [PROMISE]) includes stable, symptomatic outpatients without known coronary artery disease referred for noninvasive testing at 193 sites in North America. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) vs functional testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: A low-risk tool was developed and internally validated from July 27, 2010, to September 19, 2013, in 4631 patients receiving CCTA as their initial test, with a median follow-up of 25 months. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate pretest variables to determine factors associated with minimal risk using a two-thirds random sample for model derivation (n = 3087) and a one-third sample for testing and validation (n = 1544). The model was then applied to the CCTA and functional testing arms, and test results and event rates were ascertained. Results:A total of 1243 of 4631 patients (26.8%) were in the minimal-risk cohort. The final minimal-risk model included 10 clinical variables that together were correlated with normal CCTA results and no clinical events (C statistic = 0.725 for the derivation and validation subsets; 95% CI, 0.705-0.746): younger age; female sex; racial or ethnic minority; no history of hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidemia; family history of premature coronary artery disease; never smoking; symptoms unrelated to physical or mental stress; and higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. Across the entire PROMISE cohort, this model was associated with the lowest rates of severely abnormal test results (1.3% for CCTA; 5.6% for functional) and cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction (0.5% for a median of 25 months) among patients at the highest probability (10th decile) of minimal risk. Conclusions and Relevance: In contemporary practice, more than 25% of patients with stable chest pain referred for noninvasive testing will have normal coronary arteries and no long-term clinical events. A clinical tool using readily available pretest variables discriminates such minimal-risk patients, for whom deferred testing may be considered. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01174550.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Guidelines recommend noninvasive testing for patients with stable chest pain, although many subsequently have normal test results and no adverse clinical events. Objective: To describe a risk tool developed to use only pretest clinical data to identify patients with chest pain with normal coronary arteries and no clinical events during follow-up (minimal-risk cohort). Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of a randomized, pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain [PROMISE]) includes stable, symptomatic outpatients without known coronary artery disease referred for noninvasive testing at 193 sites in North America. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) vs functional testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: A low-risk tool was developed and internally validated from July 27, 2010, to September 19, 2013, in 4631 patients receiving CCTA as their initial test, with a median follow-up of 25 months. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate pretest variables to determine factors associated with minimal risk using a two-thirds random sample for model derivation (n = 3087) and a one-third sample for testing and validation (n = 1544). The model was then applied to the CCTA and functional testing arms, and test results and event rates were ascertained. Results: A total of 1243 of 4631 patients (26.8%) were in the minimal-risk cohort. The final minimal-risk model included 10 clinical variables that together were correlated with normal CCTA results and no clinical events (C statistic = 0.725 for the derivation and validation subsets; 95% CI, 0.705-0.746): younger age; female sex; racial or ethnic minority; no history of hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidemia; family history of premature coronary artery disease; never smoking; symptoms unrelated to physical or mental stress; and higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. Across the entire PROMISE cohort, this model was associated with the lowest rates of severely abnormal test results (1.3% for CCTA; 5.6% for functional) and cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction (0.5% for a median of 25 months) among patients at the highest probability (10th decile) of minimal risk. Conclusions and Relevance: In contemporary practice, more than 25% of patients with stable chest pain referred for noninvasive testing will have normal coronary arteries and no long-term clinical events. A clinical tool using readily available pretest variables discriminates such minimal-risk patients, for whom deferred testing may be considered. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01174550.
Authors: Stephan D Fihn; Julius M Gardin; Jonathan Abrams; Kathleen Berra; James C Blankenship; Apostolos P Dallas; Pamela S Douglas; Joanne M Foody; Thomas C Gerber; Alan L Hinderliter; Spencer B King; Paul D Kligfield; Harlan M Krumholz; Raymond Y K Kwong; Michael J Lim; Jane A Linderbaum; Michael J Mack; Mark A Munger; Richard L Prager; Joseph F Sabik; Leslee J Shaw; Joanna D Sikkema; Craig R Smith; Sidney C Smith; John A Spertus; Sankey V Williams Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-11-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: James K Min; Allison Dunning; Heidi Gransar; Stephan Achenbach; Fay Y Lin; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Matthew J Budoff; Tracy Q Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Filippo Cademartiri; Erica Maffei; Kavitha Chinnaiyan; Benjamin J W Chow; Ralph D'Agostino; Augustin DeLago; John Friedman; Martin Hadamitzky; Joerg Hausleiter; Sean W Hayes; Philipp Kaufmann; Gilbert L Raff; Leslee J Shaw; Louise Thomson; Todd Villines; Ricardo C Cury; Gudrun Feuchtner; Yong-Jin Kim; Jonathon Leipsic; Hugo Marques; Daniel S Berman; Michael Pencina Journal: Am J Med Date: 2015-04-10 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: W Bob Meijboom; Matthijs F L Meijs; Joanne D Schuijf; Maarten J Cramer; Nico R Mollet; Carlos A G van Mieghem; Koen Nieman; Jacob M van Werkhoven; Gabija Pundziute; Annick C Weustink; Alexander M de Vos; Francesca Pugliese; Benno Rensing; J Wouter Jukema; Jeroen J Bax; Mathias Prokop; Pieter A Doevendans; Myriam G M Hunink; Gabriel P Krestin; Pim J de Feyter Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-12-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Eric P Leip; Martin G Larson; Ralph B D'Agostino; Alexa Beiser; Peter W F Wilson; Philip A Wolf; Daniel Levy Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-02-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Martin Hadamitzky; Stephan Achenbach; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Daniel Berman; Matthew Budoff; Filippo Cademartiri; Tracy Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Victor Cheng; Kavitha Chinnaiyan; Benjamin J W Chow; Ricardo Cury; Augustin Delago; Allison Dunning; Gudrun Feuchtner; Millie Gomez; Philipp Kaufmann; Yong-Jin Kim; Jonathon Leipsic; Fay Y Lin; Erica Maffei; James K Min; Gil Raff; Leslee J Shaw; Todd C Villines; Jörg Hausleiter Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-05-30 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Pamela S Douglas; Gianluca Pontone; Mark A Hlatky; Manesh R Patel; Bjarne L Norgaard; Robert A Byrne; Nick Curzen; Ian Purcell; Matthias Gutberlet; Gilles Rioufol; Ulrich Hink; Herwig Walter Schuchlenz; Gudrun Feuchtner; Martine Gilard; Daniele Andreini; Jesper M Jensen; Martin Hadamitzky; Karen Chiswell; Derek Cyr; Alan Wilk; Furong Wang; Campbell Rogers; Bernard De Bruyne Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Abhinav Sharma; Adrian Coles; Nishant K Sekaran; Neha J Pagidipati; Michael T Lu; Daniel B Mark; Kerry L Lee; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Udo Hoffmann; Pamela S Douglas Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Michael G Nanna; Sreekanth Vemulapalli; Christopher B Fordyce; Daniel B Mark; Manesh R Patel; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Michelle Kelsey; Beth Martinez; Eric Yow; Sarah Mullen; Gregg W Stone; Ori Ben-Yehuda; James E Udelson; Campbell Rogers; Pamela S Douglas Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2021-12-23 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Christopher B Fordyce; C Larry Hill; Daniel B Mark; Brooke Alhanti; Patricia A Pellikka; Udo Hoffmann; Manesh R Patel; Pamela S Douglas Journal: Heart Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 7.365