Literature DB >> 28199464

Identification of Patients With Stable Chest Pain Deriving Minimal Value From Noninvasive Testing: The PROMISE Minimal-Risk Tool, A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Christopher B Fordyce1,2, Pamela S Douglas2, Rhonda S Roberts2, Udo Hoffmann3, Hussein R Al-Khalidi2, Manesh R Patel2, Christopher B Granger2, John Kostis4, Daniel B Mark2, Kerry L Lee2, James E Udelson5.   

Abstract

Importance: Guidelines recommend noninvasive testing for patients with stable chest pain, although many subsequently have normal test results and no adverse clinical events. Objective: To describe a risk tool developed to use only pretest clinical data to identify patients with chest pain with normal coronary arteries and no clinical events during follow-up (minimal-risk cohort). Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of a randomized, pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain [PROMISE]) includes stable, symptomatic outpatients without known coronary artery disease referred for noninvasive testing at 193 sites in North America. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) vs functional testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: A low-risk tool was developed and internally validated from July 27, 2010, to September 19, 2013, in 4631 patients receiving CCTA as their initial test, with a median follow-up of 25 months. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate pretest variables to determine factors associated with minimal risk using a two-thirds random sample for model derivation (n = 3087) and a one-third sample for testing and validation (n = 1544). The model was then applied to the CCTA and functional testing arms, and test results and event rates were ascertained.
Results: A total of 1243 of 4631 patients (26.8%) were in the minimal-risk cohort. The final minimal-risk model included 10 clinical variables that together were correlated with normal CCTA results and no clinical events (C statistic = 0.725 for the derivation and validation subsets; 95% CI, 0.705-0.746): younger age; female sex; racial or ethnic minority; no history of hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidemia; family history of premature coronary artery disease; never smoking; symptoms unrelated to physical or mental stress; and higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. Across the entire PROMISE cohort, this model was associated with the lowest rates of severely abnormal test results (1.3% for CCTA; 5.6% for functional) and cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction (0.5% for a median of 25 months) among patients at the highest probability (10th decile) of minimal risk. Conclusions and Relevance: In contemporary practice, more than 25% of patients with stable chest pain referred for noninvasive testing will have normal coronary arteries and no long-term clinical events. A clinical tool using readily available pretest variables discriminates such minimal-risk patients, for whom deferred testing may be considered. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01174550.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28199464      PMCID: PMC5470411          DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.5501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Cardiol            Impact factor:   14.676


  19 in total

1.  2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  Stephan D Fihn; Julius M Gardin; Jonathan Abrams; Kathleen Berra; James C Blankenship; Apostolos P Dallas; Pamela S Douglas; Joanne M Foody; Thomas C Gerber; Alan L Hinderliter; Spencer B King; Paul D Kligfield; Harlan M Krumholz; Raymond Y K Kwong; Michael J Lim; Jane A Linderbaum; Michael J Mack; Mark A Munger; Richard L Prager; Joseph F Sabik; Leslee J Shaw; Joanna D Sikkema; Craig R Smith; Sidney C Smith; John A Spertus; Sankey V Williams
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected angina due to coronary heart disease (SCOT-HEART): an open-label, parallel-group, multicentre trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Medical history for prognostic risk assessment and diagnosis of stable patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  James K Min; Allison Dunning; Heidi Gransar; Stephan Achenbach; Fay Y Lin; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Matthew J Budoff; Tracy Q Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Filippo Cademartiri; Erica Maffei; Kavitha Chinnaiyan; Benjamin J W Chow; Ralph D'Agostino; Augustin DeLago; John Friedman; Martin Hadamitzky; Joerg Hausleiter; Sean W Hayes; Philipp Kaufmann; Gilbert L Raff; Leslee J Shaw; Louise Thomson; Todd Villines; Ricardo C Cury; Gudrun Feuchtner; Yong-Jin Kim; Jonathon Leipsic; Hugo Marques; Daniel S Berman; Michael Pencina
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Risk stratification using stress echocardiography: incremental prognostic value over historic, clinical, and stress electrocardiographic variables across a wide spectrum of bayesian pretest probabilities for coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Sripal Bangalore; Devi Gopinath; Siu-Sun Yao; Farooq A Chaudhry
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.251

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study.

Authors:  W Bob Meijboom; Matthijs F L Meijs; Joanne D Schuijf; Maarten J Cramer; Nico R Mollet; Carlos A G van Mieghem; Koen Nieman; Jacob M van Werkhoven; Gabija Pundziute; Annick C Weustink; Alexander M de Vos; Francesca Pugliese; Benno Rensing; J Wouter Jukema; Jeroen J Bax; Mathias Prokop; Pieter A Doevendans; Myriam G M Hunink; Gabriel P Krestin; Pim J de Feyter
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Prediction of lifetime risk for cardiovascular disease by risk factor burden at 50 years of age.

Authors:  Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Eric P Leip; Martin G Larson; Ralph B D'Agostino; Alexa Beiser; Peter W F Wilson; Philip A Wolf; Daniel Levy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-02-06       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Physician decision making and trends in the use of cardiac stress testing in the United States: an analysis of repeated cross-sectional data.

Authors:  Joseph A Ladapo; Saul Blecker; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Optimized prognostic score for coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the CONFIRM registry (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter Registry).

Authors:  Martin Hadamitzky; Stephan Achenbach; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Daniel Berman; Matthew Budoff; Filippo Cademartiri; Tracy Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Victor Cheng; Kavitha Chinnaiyan; Benjamin J W Chow; Ricardo Cury; Augustin Delago; Allison Dunning; Gudrun Feuchtner; Millie Gomez; Philipp Kaufmann; Yong-Jin Kim; Jonathon Leipsic; Fay Y Lin; Erica Maffei; James K Min; Gil Raff; Leslee J Shaw; Todd C Villines; Jörg Hausleiter
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Diagnostic Strategies for the Evaluation of Chest Pain: Clinical Implications From SCOT-HEART and PROMISE.

Authors:  Christopher B Fordyce; David E Newby; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFR(CT): outcome and resource impacts study.

Authors:  Pamela S Douglas; Gianluca Pontone; Mark A Hlatky; Manesh R Patel; Bjarne L Norgaard; Robert A Byrne; Nick Curzen; Ian Purcell; Matthias Gutberlet; Gilles Rioufol; Ulrich Hink; Herwig Walter Schuchlenz; Gudrun Feuchtner; Martine Gilard; Daniele Andreini; Jesper M Jensen; Martin Hadamitzky; Karen Chiswell; Derek Cyr; Alan Wilk; Furong Wang; Campbell Rogers; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  23 in total

1.  The United Kingdom's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline on chest pain of recent onset: A United States perspective.

Authors:  James E Udelson; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Programming and Coding Errors in a Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 3.  New Algorithm for the Prediction of Cardiovascular Risk in Symptomatic Adults with Stable Chest Pain.

Authors:  Muralidhar R Papireddy; Carl J Lavie; Abhizith Deoker; Hadii Mamudu; Timir K Paul
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Stress Testing Versus CT Angiography in Patients With Diabetes and Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Abhinav Sharma; Adrian Coles; Nishant K Sekaran; Neha J Pagidipati; Michael T Lu; Daniel B Mark; Kerry L Lee; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Udo Hoffmann; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Nuclear Cardiology in Women and Underrepresented Minority Populations.

Authors:  Renee P Bullock-Palmer; Amalia Peix; Niti R Aggarwal
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Appropriateness vs value: Echocardiography in primary care.

Authors:  Amy Bethge; Oana Penciu; Salma Baksh; Swapnil Parve; Jessika Lobraico; Andrew M Keller
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 2.882

7.  Staged testing as a solution to the challenges of testing lower risk patients.

Authors:  Venkatesh L Murthy; Khurram Nasir
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  The prospective randomized trial of the optimal evaluation of cardiac symptoms and revascularization: Rationale and design of the PRECISE trial.

Authors:  Michael G Nanna; Sreekanth Vemulapalli; Christopher B Fordyce; Daniel B Mark; Manesh R Patel; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Michelle Kelsey; Beth Martinez; Eric Yow; Sarah Mullen; Gregg W Stone; Ori Ben-Yehuda; James E Udelson; Campbell Rogers; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Physician judgement in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease and adverse events in chest pain patients.

Authors:  Christopher B Fordyce; C Larry Hill; Daniel B Mark; Brooke Alhanti; Patricia A Pellikka; Udo Hoffmann; Manesh R Patel; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 7.365

10.  Discrimination capability of pretest probability of stable coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis suggesting how to improve validation procedures.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Mincarone; Antonella Bodini; Maria Rosaria Tumolo; Federico Vozzi; Silvia Rocchiccioli; Gualtiero Pelosi; Chiara Caselli; Saverio Sabina; Carlo Giacomo Leo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.