| Literature DB >> 22796257 |
Mark A Hlatky1, Pamela S Douglas, Nakela L Cook, Barbara Wells, Emelia J Benjamin, Kay Dickersin, David C Goff, Alan T Hirsch, Elaine M Hylek, Eric D Peterson, Véronique L Roger, Joseph V Selby, James E Udelson, Michael S Lauer.
Abstract
Comparative effectiveness research (CER) aims to provide decision makers with the evidence needed to evaluate the benefits and harms of alternative clinical management strategies. CER has become a national priority, with considerable new research funding allocated. Cardiovascular disease is a priority area for CER. This workshop report provides an overview of CER methods, with an emphasis on practical clinical trials and observational treatment comparisons. The report also details recommendations to the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute for a new framework for evidence development to foster cardiovascular CER, and specific studies to address 8 clinical issues identified by the Institute of Medicine as high priorities for cardiovascular CER.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22796257 PMCID: PMC3416944 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.057
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol ISSN: 0735-1097 Impact factor: 24.094