Literature DB >> 24890288

Spine interbody implants: material selection and modification, functionalization and bioactivation of surfaces to improve osseointegration.

Prashanth J Rao1, Matthew H Pelletier, William R Walsh, Ralph J Mobbs.   

Abstract

The clinical outcome of lumbar spinal fusion is correlated with achievement of bony fusion. Improving interbody implant bone on-growth and in-growth may enhance fusion, limiting pseudoarthrosis, stress shielding, subsidence and implant failure. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium (Ti) are commonly selected for interbody spacer construction. Although these materials have desirable biocompatibility and mechanical properties, they require further modification to support osseointegration. Reports of extensive research on this topic are available in biomaterial-centric published reports; however, there are few clinical studies concerning surface modification of interbody spinal implants. The current article focuses on surface modifications aimed at fostering osseointegration from a clinician's point of view. Surface modification of Ti by creating rougher surfaces, modifying its surface topography (macro and nano), physical and chemical treatment and creating a porous material with high interconnectivity can improve its osseointegrative potential and bioactivity. Coating the surface with osteoconductive materials like hydroxyapatite (HA) can improve osseointegration. Because PEEK spacers are relatively inert, creating a composite by adding Ti or osteoconductive materials like HA can improve osseointegration. In addition, PEEK may be coated with Ti, effectively bio-activating the coating.
© 2014 Chinese Orthopaedic Association and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioactive conversion; Interbody spinal implant; Osseointegration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24890288      PMCID: PMC6583242          DOI: 10.1111/os.12098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1757-7853            Impact factor:   2.071


  55 in total

Review 1.  Radiological and clinical outcomes of novel Ti/PEEK combined spinal fusion cages: a systematic review and preclinical evaluation.

Authors:  Yusuf Assem; Ralph J Mobbs; Matthew H Pelletier; Kevin Phan; William R Walsh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Intervertebral cages from a biomechanical point of view].

Authors:  W Schmoelz; A Keiler
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  3-dimensional printing for anterior cervical surgery: a review.

Authors:  Wen Jie Choy; William C H Parr; Kevin Phan; William R Walsh; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12

4.  Impact of mechanical stability on the progress of bone ongrowth on the frame surfaces of a titanium-coated PEEK cage and a 3D porous titanium alloy cage: in vivo analysis using CT color mapping.

Authors:  Takahiro Makino; Shota Takaneka; Yusuke Sakai; Hideki Yoshikawa; Takashi Kaito
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Application of a 3D custom printed patient specific spinal implant for C1/2 arthrodesis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Alessandro Sgro; Monish M Maharaj; Paul D'Urso; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12

6.  Evolution of Design of Interbody Cages for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.071

Review 7.  Lumbar interbody fusion: recent advances in surgical techniques and bone healing strategies.

Authors:  Bin Meng; Joshua Bunch; Douglas Burton; Jinxi Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Multi-dimensional printing in thoracic surgery: current and future applications.

Authors:  Jackson K S Kwok; Rainbow W H Lau; Ze-Rui Zhao; Peter S Y Yu; Jacky Y K Ho; Simon C Y Chow; Innes Y P Wan; Calvin S H Ng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Osseodensification for enhancement of spinal surgical hardware fixation.

Authors:  Christopher D Lopez; Adham M Alifarag; Andrea Torroni; Nick Tovar; J Rodrigo Diaz-Siso; Lukasz Witek; Eduardo D Rodriguez; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2017-01-13

10.  Hydroxyapatite coating on PEEK implants: Biomechanical and histological study in a rabbit model.

Authors:  John W Durham; Sergio A Montelongo; Joo L Ong; Teja Guda; Matthew J Allen; Afsaneh Rabiei
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 7.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.