Literature DB >> 2488616

Multi-analyte immunoassay.

R P Ekins1.   

Abstract

Immunoassays rely on the molecular recognition properties possessed by antibodies to measure substances defined by a particular structure. They can therefore be defined as "structurally specific", as distinct from "functionally specific" assays, e.g. bioassays, which compare the biological effects of substances which are functionally similar, but which may differ in molecular structure. Within the broad class of "immunoassays", two subclasses may be distinguished, differing in their design. These may be described as "competitive" and "non-competitive", respectively, reflecting their dependence on the use of optimal concentrations of antibody which are either very small or very large. It is demonstrable that "non-competitive" assays are those relying on measurement of occupied antibody binding sites following reaction with analyte; conversely "competitive" assays rely on measurement of unoccupied sites. In certain assay designs, it may be shown that fractional antibody binding site occupancy is independent of (a) antibody concentration, and (b) sample volume. Such assays may be termed "ambient analyte immunoassays". This concept has been exploited in the development of free hormone and drug assays, and currently underlines the development of salivary "dip-stick" assays in the Author's Department. The concept is also being exploited in the development of "multi-analyte" immunoassay systems, enabling the simultaneous measurement of tens or even hundreds of substances simultaneously in the same small sample. These systems depend on measurement of fractional antibody occupancy using two different labels: one labeling the "sensing" antibody, the second labeling a "developing antibody", selected to react either with occupied or unoccupied sites on the "sensing" antibody. The ratio of signals emitted by the two labeled antibodies reveals the analyte concentration to which the sensing antibody has been exposed. An array of sensing antibodies, each labeled with the same fluorescent label, is scanned (by a laser), and the fluorescent signal ratio emitted from each discrete antibody couplet in the array measured. Multi-analyte immunoassay systems of this kind are likely to totally transform medical diagnosis in the foreseeable future and are also likely to be of value in the analysis of complex protein mixtures deriving from recombinant DNA technologies.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2488616     DOI: 10.1016/0731-7085(89)80079-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal        ISSN: 0731-7085            Impact factor:   3.935


  50 in total

Review 1.  Serologic laboratory findings in malignancy.

Authors:  Félix Fernández Madrid; Marie-Claire Maroun
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.670

2.  Accuracy and reproducibility of a multiplex immunoassay platform: a validation study.

Authors:  Julie A Bastarache; Tatsuki Koyama; Nancy E Wickersham; Daphne B Mitchell; Ray L Mernaugh; Lorraine B Ware
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  High density peptide microarrays. In situ synthesis and applications.

Authors:  Xiaolian Gao; Jean Philippe Pellois; Younghwa Na; Younkee Kim; Erdogan Gulari; Xiaochuan Zhou
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.943

Review 4.  Emerging technology of in situ cell free expression protein microarrays.

Authors:  Amita Nand; Anju Gautam; Javier Batista Pérez; Alejandro Merino; Jinsong Zhu
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 14.870

5.  Sequential multiplex analyte capturing for phosphoprotein profiling.

Authors:  Oliver Poetz; Tanja Henzler; Michael Hartmann; Cornelia Kazmaier; Markus F Templin; Thomas Herget; Thomas O Joos
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 6.  New tools for classification and monitoring of autoimmune diseases.

Authors:  Holden T Maecker; Tamsin M Lindstrom; William H Robinson; Paul J Utz; Matthew Hale; Scott D Boyd; Shai S Shen-Orr; C Garrison Fathman
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 7.  Multiplexed protein measurement: technologies and applications of protein and antibody arrays.

Authors:  Stephen F Kingsmore
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 84.694

8.  Realizing the promise of reverse phase protein arrays for clinical, translational, and basic research: a workshop report: the RPPA (Reverse Phase Protein Array) society.

Authors:  Rehan Akbani; Karl-Friedrich Becker; Neil Carragher; Ted Goldstein; Leanne de Koning; Ulrike Korf; Lance Liotta; Gordon B Mills; Satoshi S Nishizuka; Michael Pawlak; Emanuel F Petricoin; Harvey B Pollard; Bryan Serrels; Jingchun Zhu
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  One-incubation one-hour multiplex ELISA enabled by aqueous two-phase systems.

Authors:  Mintra Tongdee; Cameron Yamanishi; Midori Maeda; Taisuke Kojima; John Dishinger; Rattikan Chantiwas; Shuichi Takayama
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.616

Review 10.  Antibody-based protein multiplex platforms: technical and operational challenges.

Authors:  Allison A Ellington; Iftikhar J Kullo; Kent R Bailey; George G Klee
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 8.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.