Literature DB >> 21277854

Accuracy and reproducibility of a multiplex immunoassay platform: a validation study.

Julie A Bastarache1, Tatsuki Koyama, Nancy E Wickersham, Daphne B Mitchell, Ray L Mernaugh, Lorraine B Ware.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiplex immunoassays offer many advantages over singleplex assays for the analysis of multiple analytes in a single sample. We sought to validate a specific multiplex cytokine immunoassay (Human 9-plex cytokine array on the Searchlight® platform by Thermoscientific) prior to use in a large clinical study.
METHODS: We compared spike and recovery of recombinant proteins on the Searchlight® platform to singleplex immunoassays purchased from R&D Systems, measured identical patient samples on the two different platforms, and measured identical patient samples on different days to measure intra- and inter-assay variability.
RESULTS: Assays using the Searchlight® platform had inefficient recovery of spiked recombinant proteins compared to R&D Systems singleplex assays. Assaying identical patients samples on different days on the Searchlight platform had acceptable intra-assay variability (intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV%) range for all analytes of 9.1-13.7) but unacceptably high inter-assay variability (CV% range for all analytes 16.7-119.3) suggesting plate-to plate variability. Similar assays for individual cytokines on the R&D platform had an intra-assay CV% range of 1.6-6.4 and an inter-assay CV% range of 3.8-7.1. Some deficiencies in Searchlight® assay performance may be due to irregularities in spotting of capture antibodies during manufacturing.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the Searchlight® multiplex immunoassay platform would require extensive additional assay optimization prior to widespread clinical research use. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21277854      PMCID: PMC3108329          DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2011.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol Methods        ISSN: 0022-1759            Impact factor:   2.303


  17 in total

1.  Simultaneous analysis of eight human Th1/Th2 cytokines using microarrays.

Authors:  Sun W Tam; Rick Wiese; Sandy Lee; James Gilmore; Krishnanand D Kumble
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 2.  Protein microarrays and proteomics.

Authors:  Gavin MacBeath
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 3.  Multiplexed and microparticle-based analyses: quantitative tools for the large-scale analysis of biological systems.

Authors:  John P Nolan; Francis Mandy
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.355

4.  Comparison of three multiplex cytokine analysis systems: Luminex, SearchLight and FAST Quant.

Authors:  Gendie E Lash; Paula J Scaife; Barbara A Innes; Harry A Otun; Steven C Robson; Roger F Searle; Judith N Bulmer
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 5.  Multiplexed protein measurement: technologies and applications of protein and antibody arrays.

Authors:  Stephen F Kingsmore
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 6.  Multi-analyte immunoassay.

Authors:  R P Ekins
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.935

7.  Protein microarray platform for the multiplex analysis of biomarkers in human sera.

Authors:  Teresa Urbanowska; Sara Mangialaio; Christophe Zickler; Sirinda Cheevapruk; Paul Hasler; Stephan Regenass; Francois Legay
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Evaluation of surface chemistries for antibody microarrays.

Authors:  Shannon L Seurynck-Servoss; Amanda M White; Cheryl L Baird; Karin D Rodland; Richard C Zangar
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 3.365

9.  Development of a sensitive microarray immunoassay and comparison with standard enzyme-linked immunoassay for cytokine analysis.

Authors:  Paul R Knight; Arun Sreekumar; Javed Siddiqui; Bharathi Laxman; Shannon Copeland; Arul Chinnaiyan; Daniel G Remick
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Validating a custom multiplex ELISA against individual commercial immunoassays using clinical samples.

Authors:  Michael Liew; Matthew C Groll; James E Thompson; Sara L Call; Joann E Moser; Justin D Hoopes; Karl Voelkerding; Carl Wittwer; Rex S Spendlove
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.993

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Recommendations for Use and Fit-for-Purpose Validation of Biomarker Multiplex Ligand Binding Assays in Drug Development.

Authors:  Darshana Jani; John Allinson; Flora Berisha; Kyra J Cowan; Viswanath Devanarayan; Carol Gleason; Andreas Jeromin; Steve Keller; Masood U Khan; Bill Nowatzke; Paul Rhyne; Laurie Stephen
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Validation of a multiplex electrochemiluminescent immunoassay platform in human and mouse samples.

Authors:  J A Bastarache; T Koyama; N E Wickersham; L B Ware
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Calculations for Adjusting Endogenous Biomarker Levels During Analytical Recovery Assessments for Ligand-Binding Assay Bioanalytical Method Validation.

Authors:  John F Marcelletti; Cindy L Evans; Manju Saxena; Adriana E Lopez
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Performance evaluation of FlowCytomix assays to quantify cytokines in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Xuefeng Wang; Liyang Dong; Yong Liang; Hongchang Ni; Jun Tang; Chengcheng Xu; Yuepeng Zhou; Yuting Su; Jun Wang; Deyu Chen; Chaoming Mao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

5.  Methodical and pre-analytical characteristics of a multiplex cancer biomarker immunoassay.

Authors:  Natalie Hermann; Katja Dreßen; Frank A Schildberg; Christopher Jakobs; Stefan Holdenrieder
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2014-12-26

Review 6.  Bioanalytical chemistry of cytokines--a review.

Authors:  Julie A Stenken; Andreas J Poschenrieder
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 6.558

7.  Receptor-binding domain-based immunoassays for serosurveillance differentiate efficiently between SARS-CoV2-exposed and non-exposed farmed mink.

Authors:  Jorge Pulido; Marga García-Durán; Ricardo Fernández-Antonio; Carmen Galán; Lissette López; Carmen Vela; Ángel Venteo; Paloma Rueda; Luis A Rivas
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 1.279

8.  Toward development of a surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)-based cancer diagnostic immunoassay panel.

Authors:  Jennifer H Granger; Michael C Granger; Matthew A Firpo; Sean J Mulvihill; Marc D Porter
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 4.616

9.  Quality control, analysis and secure sharing of Luminex® immunoassay data using the open source LabKey Server platform.

Authors:  Josh Eckels; Cory Nathe; Elizabeth K Nelson; Sara G Shoemaker; Elizabeth Van Nostrand; Nicole L Yates; Vicki C Ashley; Linda J Harris; Mark Bollenbeck; Youyi Fong; Georgia D Tomaras; Britt Piehler
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Early detection of NSCLC with scFv selected against IgM autoantibody.

Authors:  Tetyana Pedchenko; Ray Mernaugh; Dipti Parekh; Ming Li; Pierre P Massion
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.