Literature DB >> 24883078

Simulation and evaluation of a high resolution VIP PEM system with a dedicated LM-OSEM algorithm.

D Uzun1, G De Lorenzo1, M Kolstein1, M Chmeissani1.   

Abstract

Over the last two decades there have been a growing number of designs for positron emission tomography (PET) cameras optimized to image the breast. These devices, commonly known as positron emission mammography (PEM) cameras allow much more spatial resolution by putting the photon detectors directly on the breast. PEM cameras have a compact geometry with a restricted field of view (FOV) thus exhibiting higher performance and lower cost than large whole body PET scanners. Typical PEM designs are based on scintillators such as bismuth germanate (BGO), lutetium oxorthosilicate (LSO) or lutetium yttrium orthosicilate (LYSO), and characterized by large parallax error due to deficiency of the depth of interaction (DOI) information from crystals. In the case of parallel geometry PEM, large parallax error results in poor image resolution along the vertical axis. In the framework of the Voxel Imaging PET (VIP) pathfinder project, we propose a high resolution PEM scanner based on pixelated solid-state CdTe detectors. The pixel PEM device with a millimeter-size pixel pitch provides an excellent spatial resolution in all directions 8 times better than standard commercial devices with a point spread function (PSF) of 1 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) and excellent energy resolution of down to 1.6% FWHM at 511 keV photons at room temperature. The system is capable to detect down to 1 mm diameter hot spheres in warm background.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Image reconstruction in medical imaging; Medical-image reconstruction methods and algorithms, computer-aided software; Solid state detectors

Year:  2014        PMID: 24883078      PMCID: PMC4035764          DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/9/05/C05011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Instrum        ISSN: 1748-0221            Impact factor:   1.415


  6 in total

1.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data.

Authors:  H M Hudson; R S Larkin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Feasibility study for positron emission mammography.

Authors:  C J Thompson; K Murthy; I N Weinberg; F Mako
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Breast cancer screening.

Authors:  K M Harris; V G Vogel
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1997 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 9.264

4.  Clinical imaging characteristics of the positron emission mammography camera: PEM Flex Solo II.

Authors:  Lawrence MacDonald; John Edwards; Thomas Lewellen; David Haseley; James Rogers; Paul Kinahan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Energy and coincidence time resolution measurements of CdTe detectors for PET.

Authors:  G Ariño; M Chmeissani; G De Lorenzo; C Puigdengoles; E Cabruja; Y Calderón; M Kolstein; J G Macias-Montero; R Martinez; E Mikhaylova; D Uzun
Journal:  J Instrum       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.415

6.  Pixelated CdTe detectors to overcome intrinsic limitations of crystal based positron emission mammographs.

Authors:  G De Lorenzo; M Chmeissani; D Uzun; M Kolstein; I Ozsahin; E Mikhaylova; P Arce; M Cañadas; G Ariño; Y Calderón
Journal:  J Instrum       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.415

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.