Literature DB >> 24881615

Prosthetic rehabilitation after orbital exenteration: a case series.

Gunjan Pruthi1, Veena Jain, Suresh Rajendiran, Ritu Jha.   

Abstract

Orbital exenteration is executed by the ophthalmic surgeon to treat various neoplasms or non-malignant diseases. But it leads to several functional, esthetic and psychological problems for the patients. Orbital prosthesis is a good alternative for cosmetic and psychological rehabilitation, if reconstructive surgery is not possible or not desired by the patient. In the following article, different materials and retentive aids for fabrication of an orbital prosthesis given in the literature along with few novel methods have been discussed for four patients who underwent orbital exenteration. Factors that an ophthalmic surgeon should consider during surgery, which may later on help the prosthodontist to obtain good cosmetic results, are also discussed briefly. Remarkable results can be obtained if both work as a team for one common goal i.e. improvement of quality of life of the patient after orbital exenteration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24881615      PMCID: PMC4065520          DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.133523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0301-4738            Impact factor:   1.848


  15 in total

1.  A modified technique for retention of orbital prosthesis.

Authors:  Sameera R Shaikh; Pravinkumar G Patil; Santosh Puri
Journal:  Indian J Dent Res       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec

2.  Use of a stud attachment to retain a silicone orbital prosthesis: a clinical report.

Authors:  Satyabodh S Guttal; Babashankar Alva; Ramesh K Nadiger
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Simplified technique for orbital prosthesis fabrication: a clinical report.

Authors:  Chandrika Veerareddy; K Chandrasekharan Nair; G Ramaswamy Reddy
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  A novel method for retention of an orbital prosthesis in a case with continuous maxillary and orbital defect.

Authors:  Gunjan Pruthi; Veena Jain; Swati Sikka
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2010-12-08

5.  Minimizing prosthesis movement in a midfacial defect: a clinical report.

Authors:  H B Dumbrigue; A Fyler
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Materials in maxillofacial prosthetics.

Authors:  V A Chalian; R W Phillips
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1974

7.  Prosthetic complications of extraoral implants.

Authors:  M R Arcuri; W E LaVelle; E Fyler; R Jons
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Effect of adhesive retention on maxillofacial prostheses. Part I: skin dressings and solvent removers.

Authors:  S Kiat-amnuay; L Gettleman; Z Khan; L J Goldsmith
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  Implant-retained prostheses for facial defects: an up to 14-year follow-up report on the survival rates of implants at UCLA.

Authors:  Eleni D Roumanas; Earl G Freymiller; Ting-Ling Chang; Tara Aghaloo; John Beumer
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.681

10.  Review of 345 eye amputations carried out in the period 1996-2003, at Rigshospitalet, Denmark.

Authors:  Marie Louise Roed Rasmussen; Jan Ulrik Prause; Martin Johnson; Finn Kamper-Jørgensen; Peter Bjerre Toft
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.761

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Prosthetic Reconstruction of Orbital Defects.

Authors:  Aurora Vincent; Scott Kohlert; Sameep Kadakia; Raja Sawhney; Yadranko Ducic
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Completely Blind Subject with Bilateral Customised Ocular Prosthesis: A Case Report.

Authors:  Chetan Pathak; Salil Pawah; Gurpreet Singh; Ila Yadav; Shrey Kundra
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-01-01

3.  Automated Noncontact Facial Topography Mapping, 3-Dimensional Printing, and Silicone Casting of Orbital Prosthesis.

Authors:  Ernesto H Weisson; Mauro Fittipaldi; Carlos A Concepcion; Daniel Pelaez; Landon Grace; David T Tse
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 4.  Prosthetics in Facial Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jaclyn Klimczak; Samuel Helman; Sameep Kadakia; Raja Sawhney; Manoj Abraham; Allison K Vest; Yadranko Ducic
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-05-22

5.  Author's response: Prosthetic rehabilitation after orbital exenteration: a case series.

Authors:  Gunjan Pruthi; Veena Jain; Suresh Rajendiran; Ritu Jha
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Prosthodontic rehabilitation of combined oronasal defect in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using two different attachments: Two case reports.

Authors:  Kirti Bansal; Paras Rawat; Gunjan Pruthi; Veena Jain
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

7.  Orbital prosthesis- An innovative approach.

Authors:  Komal K Saroya; Kavipal Singh; Nimish Sethi; Neelam Suman; Simrat Kaur; Ramninder Bawa
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2022-03-10

8.  Improving the outcome of prosthetic rehabilitation following orbital exenteration.

Authors:  Pradeep Kumar; Himanshi Aggarwal; Pooran Chand; E Prashanti
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Rehabilitation of orbital cavity after orbital exenteration using polymethyl methacrylate orbital prosthesis.

Authors:  Sumeet Jain; Parul Jain
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

10.  Rehabilitation of orbital defect with silicone orbital prosthesis retained by dental implants.

Authors:  Satyabodh Shesharaj Guttal; Jhanvi Desai; Adarsh Kudva; Basavaraj R Patil
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.848

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.