Literature DB >> 29387298

Prosthetics in Facial Reconstruction.

Jaclyn Klimczak1, Samuel Helman1, Sameep Kadakia1, Raja Sawhney2, Manoj Abraham3, Allison K Vest4, Yadranko Ducic5.   

Abstract

Reconstruction of the head and neck can be a challenging undertaking owing to numerous considerations for successful rehabilitation. Although head and neck defects were once considered irretrievably morbid and associated with a poor quality of life, advances in surgical technique has immensely contributed to the well-being of these patients. However, all patients are not suitable surgical candidates and many have sought nonsurgical options for functional and cosmetic restoration. As such, the advent of prostheses has ameliorated those concerns and provided a viable alternative for select patient populations. Prosthetic reconstruction has evolved significantly over the past decade. Advances in biocompatible materials and imaging adjuncts have spurred further discovery and forward progress. A multidisciplinary approach to head and neck reconstruction focused on appropriate expectations and patient-centered goals is most successfully coordinated by a team of head and neck surgeons, maxillofacial surgeons, and prosthetic specialists. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the current trends for prosthetic rehabilitation of head and neck defects, and further elaborate on the limitations and advancements in the field.

Entities:  

Keywords:  defect; facial reconstruction; prosthetic

Year:  2017        PMID: 29387298      PMCID: PMC5790540          DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1603459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  84 in total

1.  A modified classification for the maxillectomy defect.

Authors:  J S Brown; S N Rogers; D N McNally; M Boyle
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.147

2.  Irritation test of tissue adhesives for facial prostheses.

Authors:  J E Dahl; G L Polyzois
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Closed-field titanium magnets for the retention of complex craniofacial prostheses.

Authors:  R Alvi; J McPhail; K Hancock
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2002-12

4.  Rapid development of auricular prosthesis using CAD and rapid prototyping technologies.

Authors:  K Subburaj; C Nair; S Rajesh; S M Meshram; B Ravi
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  Rehabilitation of nose using silicone based maxillofacial prosthesis.

Authors:  Bilal Ahmed; Amir Mehmood Butt; Mehmood Hussain; Muhammad Amin; Nazia Yazdanie
Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 0.711

6.  The forehead flap: the gold standard of nasal soft tissue reconstruction.

Authors:  Bryan J Correa; William M Weathers; Erik M Wolfswinkel; James F Thornton
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.314

7.  Maxillofacial rehabilitation after rhinectomy using two different treatment options: clinical reports.

Authors:  L Ciocca; P Maremonti; B Bianchi; R Scotti
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.837

8.  Surgical considerations in the prosthetic treatment of ocular and orbital defects.

Authors:  G R Parr; B M Goldman; A O Rahn
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 9.  Recent advances in surgery for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Remco de Bree; Charles René Leemans
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.645

10.  Effect of multi-adhesive layering on retention of extraoral maxillofacial silicone prostheses in vivo.

Authors:  Sudarat Kiat-Amnuay; Lawrence Gettleman; L Jane Goldsmith
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.426

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Prosthetic Reconstruction of Orbital Defects.

Authors:  Aurora Vincent; Scott Kohlert; Sameep Kadakia; Raja Sawhney; Yadranko Ducic
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Pore architecture effects on chondrogenic potential of patient-specific 3-dimensionally printed porous tissue bioscaffolds for auricular tissue engineering.

Authors:  David A Zopf; Colleen L Flanagan; Anna G Mitsak; Julia R Brennan; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 1.675

3.  Management of a Late Presentation of Bear Mauling with a Complex Maxillofacial Defect in a Tertiary Care Hospital - A Case Report.

Authors:  Jiten Kumar Mishra; Moumita De; Shamendra Anand Sahu; Ripu Daman Arora; Manish J Raghani; Nitin M Nagarkar
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-02-01

4.  An extensive squamous cell carcinoma of the auricle: From curative to reconstructive treatment. A case report.

Authors:  Sara Halily; Karmouch Mohamed Amine; Youssef Oukessou; Sami Rouadi; Reda Abada; Mohammed Roubal; Mohammed Mahtar
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-07-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.