Literature DB >> 31037051

Prosthetic Reconstruction of Orbital Defects.

Aurora Vincent1, Scott Kohlert2, Sameep Kadakia3, Raja Sawhney4, Yadranko Ducic5.   

Abstract

Orbital and craniomaxillofacial defects, in general, are best approached preoperatively by a multidisciplinary team with a clear reconstructive plan in place. Orbital defects result from a myriad of underlying diseases and injuries, and reconstruction after orbital evisceration, enucleation, or exenteration can pose a challenge to the reconstructive team. Reconstruction of orbital injuries with orbital implants and prostheses can lead to acceptable aesthetic outcomes, and the reconstructive surgeon should be familiar with current orbital implants and prostheses. Herein, the authors review terminology and classifications of orbital defects, different types of orbital implants, advantages and disadvantages of different orbital implant reconstructive options, types of orbital prostheses, and pros and cons of different prosthetic options.

Entities:  

Keywords:  orbital defects; orbital implant; prosthetic

Year:  2019        PMID: 31037051      PMCID: PMC6486384          DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1685479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Plast Surg        ISSN: 1535-2188            Impact factor:   2.314


  17 in total

1.  Osseointegrated craniofacial implants in the rehabilitation of orbital defects: an update of a retrospective experience in the United States.

Authors:  Joseph A Toljanic; Steven E Eckert; Eleni Roumanas; John Beumer; Joseph M Huryn; Ian M Zlotolow; David J Reisberg; Susan W Habakuk; Robert F Wright; Jeffrey E Rubenstein; Thomas R Schneid; Paul Mullasseril; Lily T Garcia; Jean-Francois Bedard; Yong-Geun Choi
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Experimental analysis of retention forces of different magnetic devices for bone-anchored auricular facial prostheses.

Authors:  A Voigt; S Christ; M Klein
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 3.  Prosthetic reconstruction of the orbit/globe.

Authors:  Ju Yon Sophie Yi; Eric J Dierks; Larry Michael Over; Matthew J Hauck
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 4.  Orbital exenteration for advanced periorbital skin cancers: 20 years experience.

Authors:  Reza S Nassab; Sunil S Thomas; Douglas Murray
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Clinical trial of chlorinated polyethylene for facial prosthetics.

Authors:  Sudarat Kiat-amnuay; Rhonda F Jacob; Mark S Chambers; James D Anderson; Rachel A Sheppard; Dennis A Johnston; Gilbert S Haugh; Lawrence Gettleman
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

6.  Current trends in managing the anophthalmic socket after primary enucleation and evisceration.

Authors:  Grant W Su; Michael T Yen
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.746

Review 7.  Multidisciplinary approaches in the management of advanced head and neck tumors: state of the art.

Authors:  Michael K Gibson; Arlene A Forastiere
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.645

8.  An algorithmic approach to reconstructive surgery and prosthetic rehabilitation after orbital exenteration.

Authors:  Matthew M Hanasono; Johnson C Lee; Justin S Yang; Roman J Skoracki; Gregory P Reece; Bita Esmaeli
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Prosthetic rehabilitation after orbital exenteration: a case series.

Authors:  Gunjan Pruthi; Veena Jain; Suresh Rajendiran; Ritu Jha
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Implant-retained craniofacial prostheses for facial defects.

Authors:  Philipp A Federspil
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.