Literature DB >> 19141150

Review of 345 eye amputations carried out in the period 1996-2003, at Rigshospitalet, Denmark.

Marie Louise Roed Rasmussen1, Jan Ulrik Prause, Martin Johnson, Finn Kamper-Jørgensen, Peter Bjerre Toft.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify the number of eye amputations, and the causative diagnoses, indications for surgery and surgical techniques applied, and to evaluate a possible change in surgical technique in a tertiary referral centre in Denmark.
METHODS: The hospital database was screened using surgery codes for patients who had undergone bulbar evisceration, enucleation or orbital exenteration in the period 1996-2003. Patient records were reviewed for gender, age, time since surgery, causative diagnosis (the disease process leading to the indication for amputation), indication for eye amputation, type of surgery and whether an implant was applied.
RESULTS: A total of 345 patients were identified as having undergone eye amputation during the 8-year period. Indications for eye amputation were: painful blind eye (127); neoplasm (119); infection (42); recent injury (25); disfiguring blind eye (25); prevention of sympathetic ophthalmia (5), and other reasons (2). Surgical procedures included 174 eviscerations, 154 enucleations and 17 orbital exenterations. The mean number of surgeries per year was 43.1. An orbital implant was applied in 168 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The most frequent indications for eye amputation were painful blind eye (37%) and neoplasm (34%). During the study period, the annual number of eye amputations was stable, but an increase in bulbar eviscerations was noticed. Orbital implants were used in 33% of patients in 1996 and 67% in 2003.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19141150     DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01435.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


  7 in total

1.  Enucleation and evisceration: indications, complications and clinicopathological correlations.

Authors:  Ali Kord Valeshabad; Masood Naseripour; Rajab Asghari; Seyed Hamid Parhizgar; Seyed Ehsan Parhizgar; Mohammad Taghvaei; Shahin Miri
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Prosthetic rehabilitation after orbital exenteration: a case series.

Authors:  Gunjan Pruthi; Veena Jain; Suresh Rajendiran; Ritu Jha
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 3.  Phantom eye syndrome: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Agda M Andreotti; Marcelo C Goiato; Eduardo P Pellizzer; Aldiéris A Pesqueira; Aimée M Guiotti; Humberto Gennari-Filho; Daniela M dos Santos
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-12-07

4.  Indications for surgical removal of the eye in rural areas in cameroon.

Authors:  Giles Kagmeni; Christelle Domngang Noche; Georges Nguefack-Tsague; Peter Wiedemann
Journal:  Ophthalmol Eye Dis       Date:  2014-06-09

5.  Rehabilitation of orbital cavity after orbital exenteration using polymethyl methacrylate orbital prosthesis.

Authors:  Sumeet Jain; Parul Jain
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

6.  Indications for eye removal surgeries. A 15-year experience at a tertiary military hospital.

Authors:  Mehmet T Koylu; Gokcen Gokce; Yusuf Uysal; Osman M Ceylan; Dorukcan Akıncıoglu; Armagan Gunal
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.484

7.  Indications for enucleation and evisceration in a tertiary eye hospital in Riyadh over a 10-year period.

Authors:  Saad A Al-Dahmash; Sawsan Saad Bakry; Nada H Almadhi; Lolwah M Alashgar
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.526

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.