Literature DB >> 2488084

Why different trials on digitalis give conflicting data.

R Jaeschke1, G H Guyatt.   

Abstract

Taking a careful look at each of the outcomes measured in randomized, controlled trials of digoxin suggest that discrepancies in results may be more apparent than real. Digoxin does work, but clinically important benefit is restricted to a relatively small proportion of congestive heart failure (CHF) patients. The play of chance, the dose of digoxin used, and the severity of heart failure in patients enrolled in the studies are other factors that may explain the variability in results that were observed. A systematic examination of the sort undertaken here is likely to help resolve apparent difference in outcomes of clinical trials of new (and old) therapies in CHF patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2488084     DOI: 10.1007/bf00133200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther        ISSN: 0920-3206            Impact factor:   3.727


  11 in total

1.  Comparative effects of therapy with captopril and digoxin in patients with mild to moderate heart failure. The Captopril-Digoxin Multicenter Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  A methodological framework for assessing health indices.

Authors:  B Kirshner; G Guyatt
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1985

3.  Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; C Bombardier; P X Tugwell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Diagnostic heterogeneity in clinical trials for congestive heart failure.

Authors:  P R Marantz; M H Alderman; J N Tobin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-07-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Methodologic problems in clinical trials in heart failure.

Authors:  G H Guyatt
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1985

6.  Minoxidil in patients with chronic left heart failure: contrasting hemodynamic and clinical effects in a controlled trial.

Authors:  J A Franciosa; R A Jordan; M M Wilen; C L Leddy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Digoxin withdrawal after cardiac failure in patients with sinus rhythm.

Authors:  A J Taggart; G D Johnston; D G McDevitt
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1983 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.105

8.  Is digoxin really important in treatment of compensated heart failure? A placebo-controlled crossover study in patients with sinus rhythm.

Authors:  J L Fleg; S H Gottlieb; E G Lakatta
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Double-blind placebo-controlled comparison of digoxin and xamoterol in chronic heart failure. The German and Austrian Xamoterol Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-03-05       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Heart failure in outpatients: a randomized trial of digoxin versus placebo.

Authors:  D C Lee; R A Johnson; J B Bingham; M Leahy; R E Dinsmore; A H Goroll; J B Newell; H W Strauss; E Haber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Digitalis and heart failure: does digitalis really produce beneficial effects through a positive inotropic action?

Authors:  R Bolognesi; D Tsialtas; C Manca
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.727

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.