Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Diagnosing overdiagnosis: conceptual challenges and suggested solutions.

Literature DB >> 24880635

Diagnosing overdiagnosis: conceptual challenges and suggested solutions.

Bjorn Hofmann¹.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 2014 PMID： 24880635 DOI： 10.1007/s10654-014-9920-5

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Epidemiol ISSN： 0393-2990 Impact factor: 8.082

× No keyword cloud information.

17 in total

Review 1. Overdiagnosis in cancer.

Authors: H Gilbert Welch; William C Black
Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2010-04-22 Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors: M G Marmot; D G Altman; D A Cameron; J A Dewar; S G Thompson; M Wilcox
Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-06-06 Impact factor: 7.640

3. Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: results from the Norwegian screening program.

Authors: Mette Kalager; Hans-Olov Adami; Michael Bretthauer; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-04-03 Impact factor: 25.391

4. Quantifying the benefits and harms of screening mammography.

Authors: H Gilbert Welch; Honor J Passow
Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 21.873

5. Overdiagnosis due to prostate-specific antigen screening: lessons from U.S. prostate cancer incidence trends.

Authors: Ruth Etzioni; David F Penson; Julie M Legler; Dante di Tommaso; Rob Boer; Peter H Gann; Eric J Feuer
Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-07-03 Impact factor: 13.506

6. An estimate of overdiagnosis 15 years after the start of mammographic screening in Florence.

Authors: Donella Puliti; Marco Zappa; Guido Miccinesi; Patrizia Falini; Emanuele Crocetti; Eugenio Paci
Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 9.162

7. Incidence, prevalence, and evidence. Scientific problems in epidemiologic statistics for the occurrence of cancer.

Authors: A R Feinstein; J M Esdaile
Journal: Am J Med Date: 1987-01 Impact factor: 4.965

Review 8. Interpreting overdiagnosis estimates in population-based mammography screening.

Authors: Rianne de Gelder; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Jacques Fracheboud; Gerrit Draisma; Harry J de Koning
Journal: Epidemiol Rev Date: 2011-06-27 Impact factor: 6.222

Review 9. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors:
Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-10-30 Impact factor: 79.321

10. Overdiagnosis among women attending a population-based mammography screening program.

Authors: Ragnhild Sørum Falk; Solveig Hofvind; Per Skaane; Tor Haldorsen
Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2013-02-25 Impact factor: 7.396

21 in total

1. The Rotterdam Study: 2016 objectives and design update.

Authors: Albert Hofman; Guy G O Brusselle; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; M Arfan Ikram; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning W Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij
Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2015-09-19 Impact factor: 8.082

Diagnosing overdiagnosis: conceptual challenges and suggested solutions.

Review 1. Overdiagnosis in cancer.

Review 2. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

3. Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: results from the Norwegian screening program.

4. Quantifying the benefits and harms of screening mammography.

5. Overdiagnosis due to prostate-specific antigen screening: lessons from U.S. prostate cancer incidence trends.

6. An estimate of overdiagnosis 15 years after the start of mammographic screening in Florence.

7. Incidence, prevalence, and evidence. Scientific problems in epidemiologic statistics for the occurrence of cancer.

Review 8. Interpreting overdiagnosis estimates in population-based mammography screening.

Review 9. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

10. Overdiagnosis among women attending a population-based mammography screening program.

1. The Rotterdam Study: 2016 objectives and design update.

2. Medicalization and overdiagnosis: different but alike.

3. Risk, Overdiagnosis and Ethical Justifications.

4. Overdiagnosis: one concept, three perspectives, and a model.

5. The overdiagnosis of what? On the relationship between the concepts of overdiagnosis, disease, and diagnosis.

6. Defining disease in the context of overdiagnosis.

7. Overdiagnostic uncertainty.

8. Medicalisation and Overdiagnosis: What Society Does to Medicine.

9. Wind turbines and health: An examination of a proposed case definition.

10. The challenges in defining and measuring diagnostic error.