Literature DB >> 24880495

Comparison of femoral neck BMD evaluation obtained using Lunar DXA and QCT with asynchronous calibration from CT colonography.

Perry J Pickhardt1, Gabriel Bodeen2, Alan Brett3, J Keenan Brown2, Neil Binkley1.   

Abstract

For patients undergoing screening computed tomography colonography (CTC), an opportunity exists for bone mineral density (BMD) screening without additional radiation exposure using quantitative computed tomography (QCT). This study investigated the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-equivalent QCT Computed Tomography X-Ray Absorptiometry (CTXA) analysis at the hip obtained using CTC examinations using a retrospective asynchronous calibration of patient scans. A cohort of 33 women, age 61.3 (10.6) yr (mean [standard deviation]), had routine CTC using various GE LightSpeed CT scanner models followed after 0-9 mo by a DXA hip BMD examination using a GE Lunar Prodigy machine. Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and T-scores of the proximal femur were measured from either prone or supine CTC examinations using Mindways QCT Pro software following standard workflow except that the CT scanners were asynchronously calibrated by phantoms scanned retrospectively of the CTC examination without the subject present. CTXA and DXA aBMD were highly correlated (R2=0.907) with a linear relationship of DXA_BMD=1.297*CTXA_BMD+0.048. The standard error of estimate (SEE) on the linear fit was 0.053 g/cm2. CTXA and DXA T-scores showed a linear relationship of DXA_T-score=1.034*CTXA_T-score+0.3 and an SEE of 0.379 T-scores. CTXA and DXA aBMD and T-score measurements showed good correlation despite asynchronous scan acquisition and retrospective QCT calibration. The SEE of 0.053 g/cm2 is on par with the literature comparing Hologic and Lunar DXA devices. The observed relationship between CTXA and Lunar DXA aBMD matches predictions from published cross-calibrations relating CTXA to DXA aBMD measurement. Thus, opportunistic use of CTXA T-scores obtained at the time of CTC could enhance osteoporosis screening.
Copyright © 2015 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone densitometry; QCT; colonography; quantitative; radiology

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24880495     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2014.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  26 in total

1.  Phantomless calibration of CT scans for measurement of BMD and bone strength-Inter-operator reanalysis precision.

Authors:  David C Lee; Paul F Hoffmann; David L Kopperdahl; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening: Addition of Quantitative CT Bone Mineral Density Evaluation to CT Colonography.

Authors:  Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Neil Binkley; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Reliability and validity of lower extremity computed tomography as a screening tool for osteoporosis.

Authors:  S Y Lee; S-S Kwon; H S Kim; J H Yoo; J Kim; J Y Kim; B C Min; S J Moon; K H Sung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Three-Dimensional Characterization of Trabecular Bone Mineral Density of the Distal Radius Utilizing Quantitative Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Tyler S Pidgeon; Katia A DaSilva; Joseph J Crisco; Eric C Johnson; Alison B Chambers; Manuel F DaSilva
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-07-18

Review 5.  Opportunistic Screening for Osteoporosis Using Computed Tomography: State of the Art and Argument for Paradigm Shift.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Ashley A Weaver; Robert J Ward; John M Boone; Robert D Boutin
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  Automated opportunistic osteoporotic fracture risk assessment using computed tomography scans to aid in FRAX underutilization.

Authors:  Noa Dagan; Eldad Elnekave; Noam Barda; Orna Bregman-Amitai; Amir Bar; Mila Orlovsky; Eitan Bachmat; Ran D Balicer
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Proximal Femur Hounsfield Units on CT Colonoscopy Correlate With Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry.

Authors:  Daniel L Christensen; Kyle E Nappo; Jared A Wolfe; Sean M Wade; Daniel I Brooks; Benjamin K Potter; Jonathan A Forsberg; Scott M Tintle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Osteoporosis and Hip Fracture Risk From Routine Computed Tomography Scans: The Fracture, Osteoporosis, and CT Utilization Study (FOCUS).

Authors:  Annette L Adams; Heidi Fischer; David L Kopperdahl; David C Lee; Dennis M Black; Mary L Bouxsein; Shireen Fatemi; Sundeep Khosla; Eric S Orwoll; Ethel S Siris; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Effect of IV contrast on lumbar trabecular attenuation at routine abdominal CT: correlation with DXA and implications for opportunistic osteoporosis screening.

Authors:  P J Pickhardt; T Lauder; B D Pooler; A Muñoz Del Rio; H Rosas; R J Bruce; N Binkley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using the sagittal reconstruction from routine abdominal CT for combined assessment of vertebral fractures and density.

Authors:  S J Lee; N Binkley; M G Lubner; R J Bruce; T J Ziemlewicz; P J Pickhardt
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.