Literature DB >> 31932801

Automated opportunistic osteoporotic fracture risk assessment using computed tomography scans to aid in FRAX underutilization.

Noa Dagan1,2,3, Eldad Elnekave4,5, Noam Barda6,7,8, Orna Bregman-Amitai5, Amir Bar5, Mila Orlovsky5, Eitan Bachmat7, Ran D Balicer6,8.   

Abstract

Methods for identifying patients at high risk for osteoporotic fractures, including dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)1,2 and risk predictors like the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX)3-6, are underutilized. We assessed the feasibility of automatic, opportunistic fracture risk evaluation based on routine abdomen or chest computed tomography (CT) scans. A CT-based predictor was created using three automatically generated bone imaging biomarkers (vertebral compression fractures (VCFs), simulated DXA T-scores and lumbar trabecular density) and CT metadata of age and sex. A cohort of 48,227 individuals (51.8% women) aged 50-90 with available CTs before 2012 (index date) were assessed for 5-year fracture risk using FRAX with no bone mineral density (BMD) input (FRAXnb) and the CT-based predictor. Predictions were compared to outcomes of major osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures during 2012-2017 (follow-up period). Compared with FRAXnb, the major osteoporotic fracture CT-based predictor presented better receiver operating characteristic area under curve (AUC), sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) (+1.9%, +2.4% and +0.7%, respectively). The AUC, sensitivity and PPV measures of the hip fracture CT-based predictor were noninferior to FRAXnb at a noninferiority margin of 1%. When FRAXnb inputs are not available, the initial evaluation of fracture risk can be done completely automatically based on a single abdomen or chest CT, which is often available for screening candidates7,8.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31932801     DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0720-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Med        ISSN: 1078-8956            Impact factor:   53.440


  33 in total

1.  Trends in computed tomography utilization rates: a longitudinal practice-based study.

Authors:  Erik P Hess; Lindsey R Haas; Nilay D Shah; Robert J Stroebel; Charles R Denham; Stephen J Swensen
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Financial impact of Medicare code bundling of CT of the abdomen and pelvis.

Authors:  David C Levin; Vijay M Rao; Laurence Parker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Screening to Prevent Osteoporotic Fractures: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Meera Viswanathan; Shivani Reddy; Nancy Berkman; Katie Cullen; Jennifer Cook Middleton; Wanda K Nicholson; Leila C Kahwati
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  [Sex education problems in schools].

Authors:  G Wild
Journal:  Fortschr Med       Date:  1974-07-18

5.  Performance of predictive tools to identify individuals at risk of non-traumatic fracture: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

Authors:  C Beaudoin; L Moore; M Gagné; L Bessette; L G Ste-Marie; J P Brown; S Jean
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Fracture liaison service: impact on subsequent nonvertebral fracture incidence and mortality.

Authors:  Kirsten M B Huntjens; Tineke A C M van Geel; Joop P W van den Bergh; Svenhjalmar van Helden; Paul Willems; Bjorn Winkens; John A Eisman; Piet P Geusens; Peter R G Brink
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; H Johansson; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  The accuracy of osteoporotic fracture risk prediction tools: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andréa Marques; Ricardo J O Ferreira; Eduardo Santos; Estíbaliz Loza; Loreto Carmona; José António Pereira da Silva
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Longitudinal trends in use of bone mass measurement among older americans, 1999-2005.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Laura Carbone; Hong Cheng; Burton Hayes; Andrew Laster; Robert Matthews; Kenneth G Saag; Robert Sepanski; Simpson B Tanner; Elizabeth Delzell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 10.  A critical review of the long-term disability outcomes following hip fracture.

Authors:  Suzanne M Dyer; Maria Crotty; Nicola Fairhall; Jay Magaziner; Lauren A Beaupre; Ian D Cameron; Catherine Sherrington
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.921

View more
  14 in total

1.  Prospective validation of a rapid CT-based bone mineral density screening method using colored spinal images.

Authors:  Elliot Varney; Asser Abou Elkassem; Majid Khan; Ellen Parker; Todd Nichols; David Joyner; Seth T Lirette; Candace Howard-Claudio; Andrew D Smith
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-10-12

2.  Deep Radiomics-based Approach to the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis Using Hip Radiographs.

Authors:  Sangwook Kim; Bo Ram Kim; Hee-Dong Chae; Jimin Lee; Sung-Joon Ye; Dong Hyun Kim; Sung Hwan Hong; Ja-Young Choi; Hye Jin Yoo
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-05-25

3.  Improved CT-based Osteoporosis Assessment with a Fully Automated Deep Learning Tool.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Thang Nguyen; Alberto A Perez; Peter M Graffy; Samuel Jang; Ronald M Summers; John W Garrett
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-08-31

4.  Automated Abdominal CT Imaging Biomarkers for Opportunistic Prediction of Future Major Osteoporotic Fractures in Asymptomatic Adults.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Peter M Graffy; Ryan Zea; Scott J Lee; Jiamin Liu; Veit Sandfort; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Opportunistic Screening at Abdominal CT: Use of Automated Body Composition Biomarkers for Added Cardiometabolic Value.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Peter M Graffy; Alberto A Perez; Meghan G Lubner; Daniel C Elton; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Computer-Aided Diagnostic Systems for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture Detection: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Paul A Bromiley; Emma M Clark; Kenneth E Poole
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 7.  Reinforcement Learning for Clinical Decision Support in Critical Care: Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Siqi Liu; Kay Choong See; Kee Yuan Ngiam; Leo Anthony Celi; Xingzhi Sun; Mengling Feng
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Prospective comparative study of quantitative X-ray (QXR) versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry to determine the performance of QXR as a predictor of bone health for adult patients in secondary care.

Authors:  Amar Rangan; Stephen P Tuck; Paul D Scott; Lucksy Kottam; Maya Jafari; Terence Watson; Ben Lopez; Ben Crone; Tim Whitbread; Adam Ratcliffe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Opportunistic diagnosis of osteoporosis, fragile bone strength and vertebral fractures from routine CT scans; a review of approved technology systems and pathways to implementation.

Authors:  Veena Aggarwal; Christina Maslen; Richard L Abel; Pinaki Bhattacharya; Paul A Bromiley; Emma M Clark; Juliet E Compston; Nicola Crabtree; Jennifer S Gregory; Eleni P Kariki; Nicholas C Harvey; Kate A Ward; Kenneth E S Poole
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 10.  Biomechanical Computed Tomography analysis (BCT) for clinical assessment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  T M Keaveny; B L Clarke; F Cosman; E S Orwoll; E S Siris; S Khosla; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 5.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.