Literature DB >> 30019965

Three-Dimensional Characterization of Trabecular Bone Mineral Density of the Distal Radius Utilizing Quantitative Computed Tomography.

Tyler S Pidgeon1,2, Katia A DaSilva1,2, Joseph J Crisco1,2, Eric C Johnson3, Alison B Chambers1,2, Manuel F DaSilva1,2.   

Abstract

Background: Distal radius (DR) fractures demonstrate patterns of predictable fragments. Bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of these regions of interest (ROIs) may guide more precise treatment.
Methods: Computed tomography (CT) scans of the DR of 42 healthy volunteers (23 female) were analyzed using quantitative CT software, measuring BMD within trabecular bone. Seven ROIs were described by alignment with the distal (volar ulnar distal [VUD], dorsal ulnar distal [DUD], volar radial distal [VRD], and dorsal radial distal [DRD]) or proximal (middle ulnar proximal [MUP], middle proximal [MP], and middle radial proximal [MRP]) sigmoid notch. Additional ROIs were the radial styloid (RS) and metadiaphysis (MD). A general estimation equation assessed subject's BMDs with predictive factors of gender, ROI, and age. The interaction between gender, ROI, and age was included in the model to allow for differences in ROI to vary with gender and/or age.
Results: Comparing ROIs within the same gender and, separately, within the same age group revealed significantly higher BMD adjacent to the radioulnar and radiocarpal joints. Male and female individuals aged ≥50 years (mean: 172.7 mg/cm3 ± 6.1) had significantly lower BMD than those aged <50 years (mean: 202.7 mg/cm3 ± 5.8) when all ROIs were considered. Males had higher mean BMD at each ROI compared with females; these differences were significant in 5 of the 9 ROIs: VUD, DUD, DRD, RS, MUP. Conclusions: Trabecular BMD of the DR is highest adjacent to the radioulnar and radiocarpal joints. Female patients and those ≥50 years have lower trabecular BMD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone mineral density; distal radius; fracture; quantitative computed tomography; trabecular bone

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30019965      PMCID: PMC6966296          DOI: 10.1177/1558944718789407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hand (N Y)        ISSN: 1558-9447


  37 in total

1.  Beware of the ulno-palmar distal radial fragment.

Authors:  E Apergis; S Darmanis; G Theodoratos; J Maris
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  2002-04

2.  A correlation exists between subchondral bone mineral density of the distal radius and systemic bone mineral density.

Authors:  Seung Hwan Rhee; Goo Hyun Baek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Biomechanics and mechanobiology of trabecular bone: a review.

Authors:  Ramin Oftadeh; Miguel Perez-Viloria; Juan C Villa-Camacho; Ashkan Vaziri; Ara Nazarian
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Simulated increases in body fat and errors in bone mineral density measurements by DXA and QCT.

Authors:  Elaine W Yu; Bijoy J Thomas; J Keenan Brown; Joel S Finkelstein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 5.  The epidemiology of distal radius fractures.

Authors:  Kate W Nellans; Evan Kowalski; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 1.907

6.  Changing incidence of hip, distal radius, and proximal humerus fractures in Tottori Prefecture, Japan.

Authors:  H Hagino; K Yamamoto; H Ohshiro; T Nakamura; H Kishimoto; T Nose
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Effect of spinal degenerative changes on volumetric bone mineral density of the central skeleton as measured by quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; I Floriani; V Torri; J Li; C van Kuijk; H K Genant; T F Lang
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.990

8.  Long-term trends in the incidence of distal forearm fractures.

Authors:  L J Melton; P C Amadio; C S Crowson; W M O'Fallon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Bone strength at the distal radius can be estimated from high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography and the finite element method.

Authors:  Joshua A Macneil; Steven K Boyd
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Prevalence and comorbidity of osteoporosis- a cross-sectional analysis on 10,660 adults aged 50 years and older in Germany.

Authors:  Marie-Therese Puth; Manuela Klaschik; Matthias Schmid; Klaus Weckbecker; Eva Münster
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  1 in total

1.  Determination of the Optimal Location for Bone Graft Harvest in the Distal Radius.

Authors:  Andrew P Matson; Andrew E Federer; Erin M Meisel; Stephen R Barchick; David S Ruch; Marc J Richard
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-03-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.