Literature DB >> 24880487

A community effort to assess and improve drug sensitivity prediction algorithms.

James C Costello1, Laura M Heiser2, Elisabeth Georgii3, Mehmet Gönen4, Michael P Menden5, Nicholas J Wang6, Mukesh Bansal7, Muhammad Ammad-ud-din4, Petteri Hintsanen8, Suleiman A Khan4, John-Patrick Mpindi8, Olli Kallioniemi8, Antti Honkela9, Tero Aittokallio8, Krister Wennerberg8, James J Collins10, Dan Gallahan11, Dinah Singer11, Julio Saez-Rodriguez5, Samuel Kaski12, Joe W Gray6, Gustavo Stolovitzky13.   

Abstract

Predicting the best treatment strategy from genomic information is a core goal of precision medicine. Here we focus on predicting drug response based on a cohort of genomic, epigenomic and proteomic profiling data sets measured in human breast cancer cell lines. Through a collaborative effort between the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the Dialogue on Reverse Engineering Assessment and Methods (DREAM) project, we analyzed a total of 44 drug sensitivity prediction algorithms. The top-performing approaches modeled nonlinear relationships and incorporated biological pathway information. We found that gene expression microarrays consistently provided the best predictive power of the individual profiling data sets; however, performance was increased by including multiple, independent data sets. We discuss the innovations underlying the top-performing methodology, Bayesian multitask MKL, and we provide detailed descriptions of all methods. This study establishes benchmarks for drug sensitivity prediction and identifies approaches that can be leveraged for the development of new methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24880487      PMCID: PMC4547623          DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biotechnol        ISSN: 1087-0156            Impact factor:   54.908


  41 in total

1.  KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes.

Authors:  M Kanehisa; S Goto
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Reverse phase protein array: validation of a novel proteomic technology and utility for analysis of primary leukemia specimens and hematopoietic stem cells.

Authors:  Raoul Tibes; Yihua Qiu; Yiling Lu; Bryan Hennessy; Michael Andreeff; Gordon B Mills; Steven M Kornblau
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.261

3.  Genome-wide methylation analysis identifies genes specific to breast cancer hormone receptor status and risk of recurrence.

Authors:  Mary Jo Fackler; Christopher B Umbricht; Danielle Williams; Pedram Argani; Leigh-Ann Cruz; Vanessa F Merino; Wei Wen Teo; Zhe Zhang; Peng Huang; Kala Visvananthan; Jeffrey Marks; Stephen Ethier; Joe W Gray; Antonio C Wolff; Leslie M Cope; Saraswati Sukumar
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

Review 6.  Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: classification, prognostication, and prediction.

Authors:  Jorge S Reis-Filho; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Collections of simultaneously altered genes as biomarkers of cancer cell drug response.

Authors:  David L Masica; Rachel Karchin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Oncogenic NRAS signaling differentially regulates survival and proliferation in melanoma.

Authors:  Lawrence N Kwong; James C Costello; Huiyun Liu; Shan Jiang; Timothy L Helms; Aliete E Langsdorf; David Jakubosky; Giannicola Genovese; Florian L Muller; Joseph H Jeong; Ryan P Bender; Gerald C Chu; Keith T Flaherty; Jennifer A Wargo; James J Collins; Lynda Chin
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  Modeling precision treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Anneleen Daemen; Obi L Griffith; Laura M Heiser; Nicholas J Wang; Oana M Enache; Zachary Sanborn; Francois Pepin; Steffen Durinck; James E Korkola; Malachi Griffith; Joe S Hur; Nam Huh; Jongsuk Chung; Leslie Cope; Mary Jo Fackler; Christopher Umbricht; Saraswati Sukumar; Pankaj Seth; Vikas P Sukhatme; Lakshmi R Jakkula; Yiling Lu; Gordon B Mills; Raymond J Cho; Eric A Collisson; Laura J van't Veer; Paul T Spellman; Joe W Gray
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC): a resource for therapeutic biomarker discovery in cancer cells.

Authors:  Wanjuan Yang; Jorge Soares; Patricia Greninger; Elena J Edelman; Howard Lightfoot; Simon Forbes; Nidhi Bindal; Dave Beare; James A Smith; I Richard Thompson; Sridhar Ramaswamy; P Andrew Futreal; Daniel A Haber; Michael R Stratton; Cyril Benes; Ultan McDermott; Mathew J Garnett
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  270 in total

Review 1.  Integrative systems and synthetic biology of cell-matrix adhesion sites.

Authors:  Eli Zamir
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Modeling gene-wise dependencies improves the identification of drug response biomarkers in cancer studies.

Authors:  Olga Nikolova; Russell Moser; Christopher Kemp; Mehmet Gönen; Adam A Margolin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Cancer: A most exceptional response.

Authors:  Vivien Marx
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  A systems approach to drug discovery in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Michael Shelanski; William Shin; Soline Aubry; Peter Sims; Mariano J Alvarez; Andrea Califano
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 7.620

5.  DREAMing of benchmarks.

Authors:  Irene Jarchum; Susan Jones
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Cancer: smoother journeys for molecular data.

Authors:  Vivien Marx
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Hierarchical Feature Selection Incorporating Known and Novel Biological Information: Identifying Genomic Features Related to Prostate Cancer Recurrence.

Authors:  Yize Zhao; Matthias Chung; Brent A Johnson; Carlos S Moreno; Qi Long
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 8.  How Machine Learning Will Transform Biomedicine.

Authors:  Jeremy Goecks; Vahid Jalili; Laura M Heiser; Joe W Gray
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Discovering long noncoding RNA predictors of anticancer drug sensitivity beyond protein-coding genes.

Authors:  Aritro Nath; Eunice Y T Lau; Adam M Lee; Paul Geeleher; William C S Cho; R Stephanie Huang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Breast cancer tumorigenicity is dependent on high expression levels of NAF-1 and the lability of its Fe-S clusters.

Authors:  Merav Darash-Yahana; Yair Pozniak; Mingyang Lu; Yang-Sung Sohn; Ola Karmi; Sagi Tamir; Fang Bai; Luhua Song; Patricia A Jennings; Eli Pikarsky; Tamar Geiger; José N Onuchic; Ron Mittler; Rachel Nechushtai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.