| Literature DB >> 24877116 |
Giovanni Morone1, Marco Tramontano2, Marco Iosa3, Jacob Shofany2, Antonella Iemma4, Massimo Musicco2, Stefano Paolucci1, Carlo Caltagirone5.
Abstract
The video game-based therapy emerged as a potential valid tool in improving balance in several neurological conditions with controversial results, whereas little information is available regarding the use of this therapy in subacute stroke patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of balance training using video game-based intervention on functional balance and disability in individuals with hemiparesis due to stroke in subacute phase. Fifty adult stroke patients participated to the study: 25 subjects were randomly assigned to balance training with Wii Fit, and the other 25 subjects were assigned to usual balance therapy. Both groups were also treated with conventional physical therapy (40 min 2 times/day). The main outcome was functional balance (Berg Balance Scale-BBS), and secondary outcomes were disability (Barthel Index-BI), walking ability (Functional Ambulation Category), and walking speed (10-meters walking test). Wii Fit training was more effective than usual balance therapy in improving balance (BBS: 53 versus 48, P = 0.004) and independency in activity of daily living (BI: 98 versus 93, P = 0.021). A balance training performed with a Wii Fit as an add on to the conventional therapy was found to be more effective than conventional therapy alone in improving balance and reducing disability in patients with subacute stroke.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24877116 PMCID: PMC4026958 DOI: 10.1155/2014/580861
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the enrolled patients. Mean ± standard deviations are reported for age and time from stroke event, median and interquartile range are reported for Barthel Index, and between the squared brackets the ranges are reported. Statistical comparison for numerical continuous variables was carried out, the t-test and chi-squared test were used to compare frequencies of categorical variables, and the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the Barthel Index scores.
| Groups | Number of patients | Mean age [years] | Time from stroke event [days] | Right/left hemiparesis | Median Barthel Index at admission (interquartile range) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wii group | 25 | 58.36 ± 9.62 | 61.00 ± 36.47 | 11R/14L | 87 (27) |
| Control group | 25 | 61.96 ± 10.31 | 41.65 ± 36.89 | 18R/7L | 78 (32) |
| Total |
| 60.16 ± 10.04 | 51.53 ± 37.57 |
|
|
|
| — | 0.208 | 0.0773 | 0.239 | 0.148 |
Figure 1Study flowchart.
Figure 2Box-plot of clinical scores at T0 (white), T1 (green), and T2 (blue): the boxes show the lower quartile, median (bold line), and upper quartile values, the whiskers represent the most extreme values within 1.5 times the interquartile range from the ends of the box, and the circles represent the outliers (data with values beyond the ends of the whiskers). Stars indicate the statistically significant differences of the Wii group in respect of the control group.