BACKGROUND:Robotic-assisted walking training after stroke aims to enable highly impaired patients to walk independently, but results have been mixed. OBJECTIVE: The authors aimed to identify the characteristics of patients who may be most likely to benefit. METHODS: A total of 48 participants with motor and gait dysfunction following subacute stroke were stratified by the motricity index into high (<29) and low (≥ 29) motor impairment groups. Each arm was randomized to a robotic or control group (RG or CG) at a mean of 20 days after stroke. All patients underwent 2 therapy sessions per day, 5 days per week for 3 months. Those in the RG underwent 20 sessions of robotic-assisted gait training in the first 4 weeks of inpatient therapy using controlled endpoint trajectories and abbreviated conventional therapy, whereas the CG received only conventional gait training. The primary outcome was the functional ambulation category (FAC), and secondary measures were the Rivermead mobility index (RMI) and 6-minute walking distance, all evaluated at hospital admission and at discharge. RESULTS: The lower motricity group assigned to an electromechanical device significantly improved in the FAC (P < .001), RMI (P = .001), and walking distance (P = .029). Conventional and robotic therapies were equivalent in the higher motricity arm. CONCLUSION:Robotic therapy combined with conventional therapy may be more effective than conventional therapy alone in patients with greater motor impairment during inpatient stroke rehabilitation.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted walking training after stroke aims to enable highly impaired patients to walk independently, but results have been mixed. OBJECTIVE: The authors aimed to identify the characteristics of patients who may be most likely to benefit. METHODS: A total of 48 participants with motor and gait dysfunction following subacute stroke were stratified by the motricity index into high (<29) and low (≥ 29) motor impairment groups. Each arm was randomized to a robotic or control group (RG or CG) at a mean of 20 days after stroke. All patients underwent 2 therapy sessions per day, 5 days per week for 3 months. Those in the RG underwent 20 sessions of robotic-assisted gait training in the first 4 weeks of inpatient therapy using controlled endpoint trajectories and abbreviated conventional therapy, whereas the CG received only conventional gait training. The primary outcome was the functional ambulation category (FAC), and secondary measures were the Rivermead mobility index (RMI) and 6-minute walking distance, all evaluated at hospital admission and at discharge. RESULTS: The lower motricity group assigned to an electromechanical device significantly improved in the FAC (P < .001), RMI (P = .001), and walking distance (P = .029). Conventional and robotic therapies were equivalent in the higher motricity arm. CONCLUSION: Robotic therapy combined with conventional therapy may be more effective than conventional therapy alone in patients with greater motor impairment during inpatient stroke rehabilitation.
Authors: Bruce H K Dobkin; Stephen E Nadeau; Andrea L Behrman; Samuel S Wu; Dorian K Rose; Mark Bowden; Stephanie Studenski; Xiaomin Lu; Pamela W Duncan Journal: J Rehabil Res Dev Date: 2014
Authors: Jan Mehrholz; Simone Thomas; Cordula Werner; Joachim Kugler; Marcus Pohl; Bernhard Elsner Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-05-10
Authors: M Iosa; G Morone; A Fusco; M Bragoni; P Coiro; M Multari; V Venturiero; D De Angelis; L Pratesi; S Paolucci Journal: Stroke Res Treat Date: 2012-12-13