Literature DB >> 24876615

The impact of continuous glucose monitoring on low interstitial glucose values and low blood glucose values assessed by point-of-care blood glucose meters: results of a crossover trial.

Norbert Hermanns1, Beatrix Schumann2, Bernhard Kulzer3, Thomas Haak3.   

Abstract

In a randomized crossover trial the impact of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was tested on the occurrence of low blood glucose values measured by point of care (POC) measurement and on low glucose values measured by CGM in the interstitial fluid. A total of 41 type 1 diabetic patients (age 42.0 ± 11.4 years, diabetes duration 15.3 ± 10.1 years, A1c 8.2 ± 1.4%) used a CGM system (Dexcom SEVEN PLUS system) twice. In first study phase (CGM blind), patients were blind regarding the CGM current glucose levels and were not alerted when critical glucose values were reached. In the second phase (CGM real time), patients had access to current glucose levels and were alerted if critical glucose values were reached. During CGM real time the proportion of hypoglycemic POC blood glucose values were significantly reduced (7.5 ± 5.6% vs 10.1 ± 7.5%; P = .04), whereas the proportion of euglycemic blood glucose values were significantly enhanced (73.7 ± 18.3% vs 68.3 ± 12.1%; P = .01). The duration of low glucose periods in the interstitial fluid was significantly lower in the CGM real time phase (125 ± 89 vs 181 ± 125 minutes per day; P = .005). The time until a low blood glucose was detected by POC measurement was shortened by 33.2 ± 76.1 minutes (P = .03). The study demonstrated that CGM is able to not only reduce duration of hypoglycemia measured by CGM in interstitial fluid, but also reduce the proportion of low POC blood glucose measurements. In addition, hypoglycemia can be detected earlier.
© 2014 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  continuous glucose monitoring; hypoglycemia; type 1 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24876615      PMCID: PMC4455434          DOI: 10.1177/1932296814524105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  17 in total

1.  Improvement in glycemic excursions with a transcutaneous, real-time continuous glucose sensor: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Satish Garg; Howard Zisser; Sherwyn Schwartz; Timothy Bailey; Roy Kaplan; Samuel Ellis; Lois Jovanovic
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Continuous home monitoring of glucose: improved glycemic control with real-life use of continuous glucose sensors in adult subjects with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Satish K Garg; William C Kelly; Mary K Voelmle; Peter J Ritchie; Peter A Gottlieb; Kim K McFann; Samuel L Ellis
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Continuous glucose monitoring: quality of hypoglycaemia detection.

Authors:  E Zijlstra; T Heise; L Nosek; L Heinemann; S Heckermann
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 4.  Hypoglycemia: still the limiting factor in the glycemic management of diabetes.

Authors:  Philip E Cryer
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.443

5.  Performance evaluation of a continuous glucose monitoring system under conditions similar to daily life.

Authors:  Stefan Pleus; Christina Schmid; Manuela Link; Eva Zschornack; Hans-Martin Klötzer; Cornelia Haug; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-01

6.  Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  William V Tamborlane; Roy W Beck; Bruce W Bode; Bruce Buckingham; H Peter Chase; Robert Clemons; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Larry A Fox; Lisa K Gilliam; Irl B Hirsch; Elbert S Huang; Craig Kollman; Aaron J Kowalski; Lori Laffel; Jean M Lawrence; Joyce Lee; Nelly Mauras; Michael O'Grady; Katrina J Ruedy; Michael Tansey; Eva Tsalikian; Stuart Weinzimer; Darrell M Wilson; Howard Wolpert; Tim Wysocki; Dongyuan Xing
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Comparison of accuracy and safety of the SEVEN and the Navigator continuous glucose monitoring systems.

Authors:  Satish K Garg; James Smith; Christie Beatson; Benita Lopez-Baca; Mary Voelmle; Peter A Gottlieb
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  Threshold-based insulin-pump interruption for reduction of hypoglycemia.

Authors:  Richard M Bergenstal; David C Klonoff; Satish K Garg; Bruce W Bode; Melissa Meredith; Robert H Slover; Andrew J Ahmann; John B Welsh; Scott W Lee; Francine R Kaufman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Tadej Battelino; Moshe Phillip; Natasa Bratina; Revital Nimri; Per Oskarsson; Jan Bolinder
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes during real time continuous glucose monitoring compared with self monitoring of blood glucose: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials using individual patient data.

Authors:  John C Pickup; Suzanne C Freeman; Alex J Sutton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-07-07
View more
  7 in total

1.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use in Type 1 Diabetes: Longitudinal Analysis Demonstrates Meaningful Improvements in HbA1c and Reductions in Health Care Utilization.

Authors:  Christopher G Parkin; Claudia Graham; John Smolskis
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-02-01

2.  Analysis of the ADA's Standard of Diabetes Care Recommendation for Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.

Authors:  Jessica Hanae Zafra-Tanaka; Ana Brañez-Condorena; David R Soriano-Moreno; Alvaro Taype-Rondan
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-29

3.  α-Glucosidase inhibitor miglitol attenuates glucose fluctuation, heart rate variability and sympathetic activity in patients with type 2 diabetes and acute coronary syndrome: a multicenter randomized controlled (MACS) study.

Authors:  Michio Shimabukuro; Atsushi Tanaka; Masataka Sata; Kazuoki Dai; Yoshisato Shibata; Yohei Inoue; Hiroki Ikenaga; Shinji Kishimoto; Kozue Ogasawara; Akira Takashima; Toshiyuki Niki; Osamu Arasaki; Koichi Oshiro; Yutaka Mori; Masaharu Ishihara; Koichi Node
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 9.951

Review 4.  Recommendations for Using Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (rtCGM) Data for Insulin Adjustments in Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Jeremy Pettus; Steven V Edelman
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-08-20

5.  Exploring diazoxide and continuous glucose monitoring as treatment for Glut1 deficiency syndrome.

Authors:  Santhi N Logel; Ellen L Connor; David A Hsu; Rachel J Fenske; Neil J Paloian; Darryl C De Vivo
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.511

6.  Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal Insulin: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Thomas Martens; Roy W Beck; Ryan Bailey; Katrina J Ruedy; Peter Calhoun; Anne L Peters; Rodica Pop-Busui; Athena Philis-Tsimikas; Shichun Bao; Guillermo Umpierrez; Georgia Davis; Davida Kruger; Anuj Bhargava; Laura Young; Janet B McGill; Grazia Aleppo; Quang T Nguyen; Ian Orozco; William Biggs; K Jean Lucas; William H Polonsky; John B Buse; David Price; Richard M Bergenstal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  The Rationale for Continuous Glucose Monitoring-based Diabetes Treatment Decisions and Non-adjunctive Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use.

Authors:  David Price; Tomas Walker
Journal:  Eur Endocrinol       Date:  2016-03-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.