| Literature DB >> 24866416 |
Manuel A Ortega1, Juan E Velásquez, Neha Garg, Qi Zhang, Rachel E Joyce, Satish K Nair, Wilfred A van der Donk.
Abstract
The final step in lanthipeptide biosynthesis involves the proteolytic removal of an N-terminal leaderEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24866416 PMCID: PMC4136673 DOI: 10.1021/cb5002526
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Chem Biol ISSN: 1554-8929 Impact factor: 5.100
Figure 1(a) Biosynthesis of epilancin 15X, involving dehydration of Ser and Thr residues by ElxB to yield dehydroalanine (Dha, green) and dehydrobutyrine (Dhb, purple), formation of lanthionine (red) or methyllanthionine (blue) rings catalyzed by ElxC, removal of the leader peptide by the peptidase ElxP, and (b) reduction of the N-terminal pyruvyl moiety catalyzed by ElxO. Abu (2-aminobutyric acid), Pyr (pyruvyl), Lac (lactyl). The leader peptide is shown in bold font.
Figure 2(a) Sequence alignment of selected LanA leader peptides for which the final products (class I lanthipeptides) have been structurally characterized. The FxLx motif is highlighted in green. The putative LanP recognition motifs are shown in blue and red boxes for the NisA-group and the ElxA-group, respectively. LanP cleavage sites are shown with an arrow. (b) MCMC phylogenetic tree of LanP enzymes corresponding to the LanA substrates shown in part a. Bayesian inferences of posterior probabilities are shown above or below the branches. Two LanPs involved in class II lanthipeptide biosynthesis (LicP for lichenicidin and CylA for cytolysin) served as the out group of the tree.
Figure 3Kinetic characterization of ElxP peptidase activity for His6-ElxA and mutant peptides. Purified (a) ElxA, (b) ElxA Q−1A, (c) ElxA L−4A, and (d) ElxA P−2A were digested with MBP-ElxP and leader peptide formation was monitored at different time points by HPLC. The rate of MBP-ElxP catalysis was plotted as a function of different substrate concentrations. The data was fit to the Michaelis–Menten equation to give the kinetic parameters shown, presented as the average ± standard error of two independent experiments.
Figure 4MALDI-TOF MS data on cleavage of NisA and NisA mutants by ElxP. (a) NisA (m/z 7992) treated with ElxP, (b) NisA-G−5D/A−4L/S−3N/R−1Q/Q−1_I1insA treated with ElxP, (c) NisA-R−1Q (m/z 7412) treated with ElxP, (d) NisA-R−1Q/Q−1_I1insA (m/z 7485) treated with ElxP, and (e) NisA-G−5D/A−4L/S−3N/R−1Q (m/z 7542) treated with ElxP. PP-precursor peptide, CP-core peptide, and LP-leader peptide. His6-NisA-G−5D/A−4L/S−3N/R−1Q/Q−1_I1insA unmodified core peptide, m/z 3568; leader peptide, m/z 4064. *Ion corresponding to peptide with gluconoylation of the His6-tag of NisA.
Substrates Tested for Reduction by His6-ElxO
| entry | substrate | relative
( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pyr-AAIVK | 2.43 ± 0.06 | 1.00 |
| 2 | Pyr-AAIV | 1.13 ± 0.00 | 0.47 |
| 3 | Pyr-AAI | 0.06 ± 0.00 | 0.02 |
| 4 | Pyr-AA | <0.03 | <0.01 |
| 5 | Pyr-A | <0.03 | <0.01 |
| 6 | Pyr-AAIVKBBIKAAKK | 14.2 ± 0.4 | 5.83 |
| 7 | Pyr-AAIVA | 1.33 ± 0.01 | 0.55 |
| 8 | Pyr-AAIAK | 1.59 ± 0.02 | 0.65 |
| 9 | Pyr-AAAVK | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 0.12 |
| 10 | Pyr-RAIVK | 5.50 ± 0.05 | 2.26 |
| 11 | Pyr-KAIVK | 4.22 ± 0.04 | 1.74 |
| 12 | Pyr-DAIVK | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.12 |
| 13 | Pyr-NAIVK | 7.60 ± 0.04 | 3.13 |
| 14 | Pyr-PAIVK | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.05 |
| 15 | Pyr-MAIVK | 15.5 ± 0.1 | 6.40 |
| 16 | Obu-AAIVK | 0.92 ± 0.03 | 0.38 |
| 17 | Obu-RAIVK | 1.51 ± 0.02 | 0.62 |
| 18 | Glx-AAIVK | <0.03 | <0.01 |
Figure 5Schematic structure of lactocin S and formation of dihydrolactocin S. (a) The lantibiotic lactocin S contains an N-terminal Pyr group. (b) Lactocin S was converted to dihydrolactocin S. Left panel: MS analysis of lactocin S (calculated m/z = 3762.8851) incubated with NADPH in the absence of His6-ElxO. The peak at m/z = 3794.9348 corresponds to oxidized lactocin S (M+O). Right panel: MS analysis of dihydrolactocin S (calculated m/z = 3764.8851) generated after incubation of lactocin S with both NADPH and His6-ElxO. The peaks at m/z = 3786.8765 and 3808.8447 correspond to the sodium and disodium adducts of dihydrolactocin S.
Figure 6(a) Single concentration and (b) serial dilution agar diffusion bioactivity assays. The samples spotted were enzymatically synthesized dihydrolactocin S (sample 1) and control samples lacking enzyme (sample 2), cofactor (sample 3), or both (sample 4) and incubated under the same reaction conditions. Sample 5 was a control assay lacking lactocin S. See also Supporting Information Figure 6.
Figure 7(a) X-ray crystal structure of ElxO bound to NADPH. (b) Side chain residues important for binding of NADPH and catalysis in ElxO. c) ElxO surface representation depicting groove, which might serve as the putative peptide-binding site.