Literature DB >> 24865860

Efficacy of a checklist-style structured radiology reporting template in reducing resident misses on cervical spine computed tomography examinations.

Eaton Lin1, Daniel K Powell, Nolan J Kagetsu.   

Abstract

The increasing use of medical checklists to promote patient safety raises the question of their utility in diagnostic radiology. This study evaluates the efficacy of a checklist-style reporting template in reducing resident misses on cervical spine CT examinations. A checklist-style reporting template for cervical spine CTs was created at our institution and mandated for resident preliminary reports. Ten months after implementation of the template, we performed a retrospective cohort study comparing rates of emergent pathology missed on reports generated with and without the checklist-style reporting template. In 1,832 reports generated without using the checklist-style template, 25 (17.6%) out of 142 emergent findings were missed. In 1,081 reports generated using the checklist-style template, 13 (11.9%) out of 109 emergent findings were missed. The decrease in missed pathology was not statistically significant (p = 0.21). However, larger differences were noted in the detection of emergent non-fracture findings, with 17 (28.3%) out of 60 findings missed on reports without use of the checklist template and 5 (9.3%) out of 54 findings missed on reports using the checklist template, representing a statistically significant decrease in missed non-fracture findings (p = 0.01). The use of a checklist-style structured reporting template resulted in a statistically significant decrease in missed non-fracture findings on cervical spine CTs. The lack of statistically significant change in missed fractures was expected given that residents' search patterns naturally include fracture detection. Our findings suggest that the use of checklists in structured reporting may increase diagnostic accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24865860      PMCID: PMC4171436          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-014-9703-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  22 in total

1.  Communication of doubt and certainty in radiological reports.

Authors:  J L Hobby; B D Tom; C Todd; P W Bearcroft; A K Dixon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Is terminology used effectively to convey diagnostic certainty in radiology reports?

Authors:  Ramin Khorasani; David W Bates; Susan Teeger; Jeffrey M Rothschild; Douglas F Adams; Steven E Seltzer
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Readability of the radiologic report.

Authors:  A E Sierra; M A Bisesi; T L Rosenbaum; E J Potchen
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Information content and clarity of radiologists' reports for chest radiography.

Authors:  J L Sobel; M L Pearson; K Gross; K A Desmond; E R Harrison; L V Rubenstein; W H Rogers; K L Kahn
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Variations in processes and structures of cardiac surgery practice.

Authors:  H G Tobler; G K Sethi; F L Grover; A L Shroyer; T E Moritz; W G Henderson; K E Hammermeister
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  The evolution of the X-ray report.

Authors:  R A Gagliardi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Outcomes analysis in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  R C Groom; J R Morton; E A Lefrak
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Getting teams to talk: development and pilot implementation of a checklist to promote interprofessional communication in the OR.

Authors:  L Lingard; S Espin; B Rubin; S Whyte; M Colmenares; G R Baker; D Doran; E Grober; B Orser; J Bohnen; R Reznick
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-10

9.  Errors and omissions in anesthesia: a pilot study using a pilot's checklist.

Authors:  Elaine M Hart; Harry Owen
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability.

Authors:  A Kong; G O Barnett; F Mosteller; C Youtz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-09-18       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  19 in total

1.  Conversion of Radiology Reporting Templates to the MRRT Standard.

Authors:  Charles E Kahn; Brad Genereaux; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Value of structured reporting in neuromuscular disorders.

Authors:  Francesco Alessandrino; Lara Cristiano; Claudia Maria Cinnante; Tommaso Tartaglione; Simonetta Gerevini; Tommaso Verdolotti; Giovanna Stefania Colafati; Emanuele Ghione; Raimondo Vitale; Lorenzo Peverelli; Claudia Brogna; Angela Berardinelli; Maurizio Moggio; Eugenio M Mercuri; Anna Pichiecchio
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Structured reports of videofluoroscopic swallowing studies have the potential to improve overall report quality compared to free text reports.

Authors:  Franziska Schoeppe; Wieland H Sommer; Mareike Haack; Miriam Havel; Marika Rheinwald; Juliane Wechtenbruch; Martin R Fischer; Felix G Meinel; Bastian O Sabel; Nora N Sommer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Structured report compliance: effect on audio dictation time, report length, and total radiologist study time.

Authors:  Tarek N Hanna; Haris Shekhani; Kiran Maddu; Chao Zhang; Zhengjia Chen; Jamlik-Omari Johnson
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-06-25

5.  Structured reporting of MRI of the shoulder - improvement of report quality?

Authors:  Sebastian Gassenmaier; Marco Armbruster; Florian Haasters; Tobias Helfen; Thomas Henzler; Sedat Alibek; Dominik Pförringer; Wieland H Sommer; Nora N Sommer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  The use of structured reporting of head and neck ultrasound ensures time-efficiency and report quality during residency.

Authors:  Benjamin P Ernst; Sebastian Strieth; Fabian Katzer; Mohamed Hodeib; Jonas Eckrich; Katharina Bahr; Tobias Rader; Julian Künzel; Matthias F Froelich; Christoph Matthias; Wieland H Sommer; Sven Becker
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Checklist design and implementation: critical considerations to improve patient safety for low-frequency, high-risk patient events.

Authors:  Carman Turkelson; Megan Keiser; Gary Sculli; Diane Capoccia
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2020-04-20

8.  Structured reporting in petrous bone MRI examinations: impact on report completeness and quality.

Authors:  Marco Armbruster; Sebastian Gassenmaier; Mareike Haack; Maximilian Reiter; Dominik Nörenberg; Thomas Henzler; Nora N Sommer; Wieland H Sommer; Franziska Braun
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Structured reporting of brain MRI following mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients.

Authors:  Sebastian Mönch; Tiberiu Andrisan; Kathleen Bernkopf; Benno Ikenberg; Benjamin Friedrich; Claus Zimmer; Dennis M Hedderich
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  Revealing the most common reporting errors through data mining of the report proofreading process.

Authors:  Jan Vosshenrich; Ivan Nesic; Joshy Cyriac; Daniel T Boll; Elmar M Merkle; Tobias Heye
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.