Literature DB >> 11064655

Communication of doubt and certainty in radiological reports.

J L Hobby1, B D Tom, C Todd, P W Bearcroft, A K Dixon.   

Abstract

We have investigated the reliability of communication of uncertainty in radiological reports. The 18 most commonly used verbal expressions of probability were identified from a series of radiological reports. 11 clinicians (three radiologists, three rheumatologists and five orthopaedic surgeons) recorded the probability that they ascribed to each of the 18 expressions using visual analogue scales. Each subject was re-tested on four occasions at least 1 week apart. The results were analysed to assess reproducibility within and between individuals. We found considerable variation in the probabilities assigned to many commonly used expressions between subjects, and between repeated testing of the same subject. Some expressions were rated much more consistently than others. "Absent", "excludes", "unlikely", "probable", "certain" and "definite" were the most consistently rated expressions. We have identified a potential source of misunderstanding in radiological reports owing to differences in interpretation of expressions used by radiologists and referring clinicians.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11064655     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.73.873.11064655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  13 in total

1.  Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting.

Authors:  Lawrence H Schwartz; David M Panicek; Alexandra R Berk; Yuelin Li; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  The uncertainty of science and the science of uncertainty.

Authors:  M Castillo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Radiological error: analysis, standard setting, targeted instruction and teamworking.

Authors:  Richard FitzGerald
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  A model of ambiguity and vagueness in clinical practice guideline recommendations.

Authors:  Shlomi Codish; Richard N Shiffman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

5.  A natural language processing system to extract and code concepts relating to congestive heart failure from chest radiology reports.

Authors:  Jeff Friedlin; Clement J McDonald
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

6.  General practitioners' views on radiology reports of plain radiography for back pain.

Authors:  Ansgar Espeland; Anders Baerheim
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.581

7.  Efficacy of a checklist-style structured radiology reporting template in reducing resident misses on cervical spine computed tomography examinations.

Authors:  Eaton Lin; Daniel K Powell; Nolan J Kagetsu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 8.  Discerning tumor status from unstructured MRI reports--completeness of information in existing reports and utility of automated natural language processing.

Authors:  Lionel T E Cheng; Jiaping Zheng; Guergana K Savova; Bradley J Erickson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Hedging their mets: the use of uncertainty terms in clinical documents and its potential implications when sharing the documents with patients.

Authors:  David A Hanauer; Yang Liu; Qiaozhu Mei; Frank J Manion; Ulysses J Balis; Kai Zheng
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

10.  Breast Imaging in the Era of Big Data: Structured Reporting and Data Mining.

Authors:  Laurie R Margolies; Gaurav Pandey; Eliot R Horowitz; David S Mendelson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.