BACKGROUND: This study investigates factors that are associated with nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines in Utah, a state where mammography screening rates have remained consistently lower than national averages. METHODS: We examined data on reported mammography use among women aged 40-74 years from the 2008 and 2010 Utah Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (n=5,197, weighted n=417,064). Logistic regression models were used to estimate the effects of individual-level and geographic (travel time to nearest mammography facility, geographic accessibility, and rural/urban residence) factors on the odds of a woman not reporting receiving a mammogram in the last 2 years. RESULTS: In 2008 and 2010, a disproportionate number of women aged 40-49 (43.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 39.9%-46.3%) reported not receiving a mammogram within the last 2 years compared to women 50-74 (26.8%, 95% CI 24.9%-28.7%). None of the geographic factors were significant predictors of screening adherence. Based on covariate adjusted models, statistically significant (p<0.05) factors associated with increased odds of not receiving mammogram within the last 2 years included not having a regular physician, no health insurance, being aged 40-49, income less than $25,000, and the presence of three or more children in the home. CONCLUSION: Mammography screening efforts in Utah should focus on improving access to insurance or a regular source of health care. Future research should also consider how best to address extreme time demands and competing priorities that present potential barriers for women with large families, resulting in lower screening levels among these women.
BACKGROUND: This study investigates factors that are associated with nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines in Utah, a state where mammography screening rates have remained consistently lower than national averages. METHODS: We examined data on reported mammography use among women aged 40-74 years from the 2008 and 2010 Utah Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (n=5,197, weighted n=417,064). Logistic regression models were used to estimate the effects of individual-level and geographic (travel time to nearest mammography facility, geographic accessibility, and rural/urban residence) factors on the odds of a woman not reporting receiving a mammogram in the last 2 years. RESULTS: In 2008 and 2010, a disproportionate number of women aged 40-49 (43.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 39.9%-46.3%) reported not receiving a mammogram within the last 2 years compared to women 50-74 (26.8%, 95% CI 24.9%-28.7%). None of the geographic factors were significant predictors of screening adherence. Based on covariate adjusted models, statistically significant (p<0.05) factors associated with increased odds of not receiving mammogram within the last 2 years included not having a regular physician, no health insurance, being aged 40-49, income less than $25,000, and the presence of three or more children in the home. CONCLUSION: Mammography screening efforts in Utah should focus on improving access to insurance or a regular source of health care. Future research should also consider how best to address extreme time demands and competing priorities that present potential barriers for women with large families, resulting in lower screening levels among these women.
Authors: Kevin A Henry; Recinda Sherman; Steve Farber; Myles Cockburn; Daniel W Goldberg; Antoinette M Stroup Journal: Health Place Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Susan A Sabatino; Ralph J Coates; Robert J Uhler; Nancy Breen; Florence Tangka; Kate M Shaw Journal: Med Care Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Stephen C Meersman; Nancy Breen; Linda W Pickle; Helen I Meissner; Paul Simon Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2009-06-20 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Whitney E Zahnd; Natoshia Askelson; Robin C Vanderpool; Lindsay Stradtman; Jean Edward; Paige E Farris; Victoria Petermann; Jan M Eberth Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Liora Sahar; Stephanie L Foster; Recinda L Sherman; Kevin A Henry; Daniel W Goldberg; David G Stinchcomb; Joseph E Bauer Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-05-30 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Mario Schootman; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Kevin A Henry; Electra D Paskett; Gary L Ellison; April Oh; Stephen H Taplin; Zaria Tatalovich; David A Berrigan Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Katherine Martin; Rachel I Vogel; Rebekah H Nagler; Jean F Wyman; Nancy Raymond; Deanna Teoh; Alicia M Allen; Kristine M C Talley; Susan Mason; Anne H Blaes Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2019-07-16 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Tracy Onega; Tor D Tosteson; Julie Weiss; Jennifer S Haas; Martha Goodrich; Roberta DiFlorio; Charles Brackett; Cheryl Clark; Kimberly Harris; Anna N A Tosteson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-08-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Kevin A Henry; Antoinette M Stroup; Echo L Warner; Deanna Kepka Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 4.254