Literature DB >> 24865409

Association between individual and geographic factors and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines.

Kevin A Henry1, Kaila McDonald, Recinda Sherman, Anita Y Kinney, Antoinette M Stroup.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study investigates factors that are associated with nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines in Utah, a state where mammography screening rates have remained consistently lower than national averages.
METHODS: We examined data on reported mammography use among women aged 40-74 years from the 2008 and 2010 Utah Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (n=5,197, weighted n=417,064). Logistic regression models were used to estimate the effects of individual-level and geographic (travel time to nearest mammography facility, geographic accessibility, and rural/urban residence) factors on the odds of a woman not reporting receiving a mammogram in the last 2 years.
RESULTS: In 2008 and 2010, a disproportionate number of women aged 40-49 (43.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 39.9%-46.3%) reported not receiving a mammogram within the last 2 years compared to women 50-74 (26.8%, 95% CI 24.9%-28.7%). None of the geographic factors were significant predictors of screening adherence. Based on covariate adjusted models, statistically significant (p<0.05) factors associated with increased odds of not receiving mammogram within the last 2 years included not having a regular physician, no health insurance, being aged 40-49, income less than $25,000, and the presence of three or more children in the home.
CONCLUSION: Mammography screening efforts in Utah should focus on improving access to insurance or a regular source of health care. Future research should also consider how best to address extreme time demands and competing priorities that present potential barriers for women with large families, resulting in lower screening levels among these women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24865409      PMCID: PMC4129969          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  30 in total

Review 1.  Health disparities in receipt of screening mammography in Latinas: a critical review of recent literature.

Authors:  Kristen J Wells; Richard G Roetzheim
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.302

2.  United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored.

Authors:  R Edward Hendrick; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Disparities in screening mammography services by race/ethnicity and health insurance.

Authors:  Garth H Rauscher; Kristi L Allgood; Steve Whitman; Emily Conant
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter?

Authors:  R M Andersen
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1995-03

5.  Equity of access to medical care: a conceptual and empirical overview.

Authors:  L A Aday; R M Andersen
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  The joint effects of census tract poverty and geographic access on late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in 10 US States.

Authors:  Kevin A Henry; Recinda Sherman; Steve Farber; Myles Cockburn; Daniel W Goldberg; Antoinette M Stroup
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.078

7.  Disparities in mammography use among US women aged 40-64 years, by race, ethnicity, income, and health insurance status, 1993 and 2005.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Ralph J Coates; Robert J Uhler; Nancy Breen; Florence Tangka; Kate M Shaw
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Mammography use among women ages 40-49 after the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation.

Authors:  Lauren D Block; Marian P Jarlenski; Albert W Wu; Wendy L Bennett
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer screening among US women: trends from 2000 to 2005.

Authors:  Jaeyoung Kim; Soong Nang Jang
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2008-05

10.  Access to mammography screening in a large urban population: a multi-level analysis.

Authors:  Stephen C Meersman; Nancy Breen; Linda W Pickle; Helen I Meissner; Paul Simon
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 2.506

View more
  20 in total

1.  Challenges of using nationally representative, population-based surveys to assess rural cancer disparities.

Authors:  Whitney E Zahnd; Natoshia Askelson; Robin C Vanderpool; Lindsay Stradtman; Jean Edward; Paige E Farris; Victoria Petermann; Jan M Eberth
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Providing Higher Resolution Indicators of Rurality in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database: Implications for Patient Privacy and Research.

Authors:  Jennifer L Moss; David G Stinchcomb; Mandi Yu
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  GIScience and cancer: State of the art and trends for cancer surveillance and epidemiology.

Authors:  Liora Sahar; Stephanie L Foster; Recinda L Sherman; Kevin A Henry; Daniel W Goldberg; David G Stinchcomb; Joseph E Bauer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Geospatial Approaches to Cancer Control and Population Sciences.

Authors:  Mario Schootman; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Kevin A Henry; Electra D Paskett; Gary L Ellison; April Oh; Stephen H Taplin; Zaria Tatalovich; David A Berrigan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Mammography Screening Practices in Average-Risk Women Aged 40-49 Years in Primary Care: A Comparison of Physician and Nonphysician Providers in Minnesota.

Authors:  Katherine Martin; Rachel I Vogel; Rebekah H Nagler; Jean F Wyman; Nancy Raymond; Deanna Teoh; Alicia M Allen; Kristine M C Talley; Susan Mason; Anne H Blaes
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 6.  Breast Cancer Disparities and the Impact of Geography.

Authors:  Samilia Obeng-Gyasi; Barnabas Obeng-Gyasi; Willi Tarver
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 3.495

7.  Influence of geographic access and socioeconomic characteristics on breast cancer outcomes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Benoit Conti; Audrey Bochaton; Hélène Charreire; Hélène Kitzis-Bonsang; Caroline Desprès; Sandrine Baffert; Charlotte Ngô
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Multi-level Influences on Breast Cancer Screening in Primary Care.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Tor D Tosteson; Julie Weiss; Jennifer S Haas; Martha Goodrich; Roberta DiFlorio; Charles Brackett; Cheryl Clark; Kimberly Harris; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Area-level Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Use of Mammography Screening: A Multilevel Analysis of the Health of Houston Survey.

Authors:  William A Calo; Sally W Vernon; David R Lairson; Stephen H Linder
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2016-01-22

10.  Geographic Factors and Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination Initiation among Adolescent Girls in the United States.

Authors:  Kevin A Henry; Antoinette M Stroup; Echo L Warner; Deanna Kepka
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.