Literature DB >> 18515996

Socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer screening among US women: trends from 2000 to 2005.

Jaeyoung Kim1, Soong Nang Jang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study describes trends in the socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer screening among US women aged 40 or over, from 2000 to 2005. We assessed 1) the disparities in each socioeconomic dimension; 2) the changes in screening mammography rates over time according to income, education, and race; and 3) the sizes and trends of the disparities over time.
METHODS: Using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) from 2000 to 2005, we calculated the age-adjusted screening rate according to relative household income, education level, health insurance, and race. Odds ratios and the relative inequality index (RII) were also calculated, controlling for age.
RESULTS: Women in their 40s and those with lower relative incomes were less likely to undergo screening mammography. The disparity based on relative income was greater than that based on education or race (the RII among low-income women across the survey years was 3.00 to 3.48). The overall participation rate and absolute differences among socioeconomic groups changed little or decreased slightly across the survey years. However, the degree of each socioeconomic disparity and the relative inequality among socioeconomic positions remained quite consistent.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the trend of the disparity in breast cancer screening varied by socioeconomic dimension. Continued differences in breast cancer screening rates related to income level should be considered in future efforts to decrease the disparities in breast cancer among socioeconomic groups. More focused interventions, as well as the monitoring of trends in cancer screening participation by income and education, are needed in different social settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18515996     DOI: 10.3961/jpmph.2008.41.3.186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health        ISSN: 1975-8375


  23 in total

1.  Use of annual mammography among older women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Phyllis Brawarsky; Bridget A Neville; Garrett M Fitzmaurice; Michael J Hassett; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Association between individual and geographic factors and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines.

Authors:  Kevin A Henry; Kaila McDonald; Recinda Sherman; Anita Y Kinney; Antoinette M Stroup
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 3.  Do community health worker interventions improve rates of screening mammography in the United States? A systematic review.

Authors:  Kristen J Wells; John S Luque; Branko Miladinovic; Natalia Vargas; Yasmin Asvat; Richard G Roetzheim; Ambuj Kumar
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Baby Boomers and Birth Certificates: Early-Life Socioeconomic Status and Cancer Risk in Adulthood.

Authors:  Antoinette M Stroup; Kimberly A Herget; Heidi A Hanson; Diana Lane Reed; Jared T Butler; Kevin A Henry; C Janna Harrell; Carol Sweeney; Ken R Smith
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Breast cancer knowledge and practices among D/deaf women.

Authors:  Barbara A Berman; Angela Jo; William G Cumberland; Heidi Booth; Jon Britt; Carolyn Stern; Philip Zazove; Gary Kaufman; Georgia Robins Sadler; Roshan Bastani
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 2.554

6.  Disparities in the use of screening magnetic resonance imaging of the breast in community practice by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Jennifer S Haas; Deirdre A Hill; Robert D Wellman; Rebecca A Hubbard; Christoph I Lee; Karen J Wernli; Natasha K Stout; Anna N A Tosteson; Louise M Henderson; Jennifer A Alford-Teaster; Tracy L Onega
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Changes in access to screening mammography, 2008-2011.

Authors:  Elena B Elkin; J Paige Nobles; Laura C Pinheiro; Coral L Atoria; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 8.  Opportunities and challenges for the use of large-scale surveys in public health research: a comparison of the assessment of cancer screening behaviors.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Nancy Breen; Carrie N Klabunde; Richard P Moser; Bryan Leyva; Erica S Breslau; Sarah C Kobrin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Survival trends in children with hepatoblastoma.

Authors:  John D Horton; Sukhyung Lee; Shaun R Brown; Julia Bader; Donald E Meier
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 1.827

10.  Reducing disparities in mammography-use in a multicultural population in Israel.

Authors:  Orna Baron-Epel; Nurit Friedman; Omri Lernau
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2009-05-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.