Literature DB >> 23454732

The joint effects of census tract poverty and geographic access on late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in 10 US States.

Kevin A Henry1, Recinda Sherman, Steve Farber, Myles Cockburn, Daniel W Goldberg, Antoinette M Stroup.   

Abstract

This study evaluated independent and joint effects of census tract (CT) poverty and geographic access to mammography on stage at diagnosis for breast cancer. The study included 161,619 women 40+ years old diagnosed with breast cancer between 2004 -2006 in ten participating US states. Multilevel logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of late-stage breast cancer diagnosis for the entire study population and by state. Poverty was independently associated with late-stage in the overall population (poverty rates >20% OR=1.30, 95% CI=1.26- 1.35) and for 9 of the 10 states. Geographic access was not associated with late-stage diagnosis after adjusting for CT poverty. State-specific analysis provided little evidence that geographic access was associated with breast cancer stage at diagnosis, and after adjusting for poverty, geographic access mattered in only 1 state. Overall, compared to women with private insurance, the adjusted odds ratios for late stage at diagnosis among women with either no insurance, Medicaid, or Medicare were 1.80 (95% CI = 1.65, 1.96), 1.75 (95% CI = 1.68, 1.84), and 1.05 (95% CI 1.01, 1.08), respectively. Although geographic access to mammography was not a significant predictor of late-stage breast cancer diagnosis, women in high poverty areas or uninsured are at greatest risk of being diagnosed with late-stage breast cancer regardless of geographic location and may benefit from targeted interventions.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23454732     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Place        ISSN: 1353-8292            Impact factor:   4.078


  27 in total

Review 1.  Geographic Access to Mammography and Its Relationship to Breast Cancer Screening and Stage at Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jenna A Khan-Gates; Jennifer L Ersek; Jan M Eberth; Swann A Adams; Sandi L Pruitt
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2015-07-26

2.  Niccolai et al. respond.

Authors:  Linda M Niccolai; Pamela J Julian; James I Meek; James L Hadler; Lynn Sosa
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Disadvantaged neighborhoods and racial disparity in breast cancer outcomes: the biological link.

Authors:  Geetanjali Saini; Angela Ogden; Lauren E McCullough; Mylin Torres; Padmashree Rida; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Association between individual and geographic factors and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines.

Authors:  Kevin A Henry; Kaila McDonald; Recinda Sherman; Anita Y Kinney; Antoinette M Stroup
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  County-level cumulative environmental quality associated with cancer incidence.

Authors:  Jyotsna S Jagai; Lynne C Messer; Kristen M Rappazzo; Christine L Gray; Shannon C Grabich; Danelle T Lobdell
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Geographic access to mammography facilities and frequency of mammography screening.

Authors:  Patricia I Jewett; Ronald E Gangnon; Elena Elkin; John M Hampton; Elizabeth A Jacobs; Kristen Malecki; James LaGro; Polly A Newcomb; Amy Trentham-Dietz
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.797

Review 7.  GIScience and cancer: State of the art and trends for cancer surveillance and epidemiology.

Authors:  Liora Sahar; Stephanie L Foster; Recinda L Sherman; Kevin A Henry; Daniel W Goldberg; David G Stinchcomb; Joseph E Bauer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Medicaid Beneficiaries: The Role of Physician Payment and Managed Care.

Authors:  Lindsay M Sabik; Bassam Dahman; Anushree Vichare; Cathy J Bradley
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.929

9.  Racial disparities in all-cause mortality among younger commercially insured women with incident metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Christine Leopold; Anita K Wagner; Fang Zhang; Christine Y Lu; Craig Earle; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Dennis Ross-Degnan; J Frank Wharam
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Baby Boomers and Birth Certificates: Early-Life Socioeconomic Status and Cancer Risk in Adulthood.

Authors:  Antoinette M Stroup; Kimberly A Herget; Heidi A Hanson; Diana Lane Reed; Jared T Butler; Kevin A Henry; C Janna Harrell; Carol Sweeney; Ken R Smith
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.