Literature DB >> 24861613

Risk of positive nonsentinel nodes in women with 1-2 positive sentinel nodes related to age and molecular subtype approximated by receptor status.

Gary M Freedman1, Barbara L Fowble, Tianyu Li, E Shelley Hwang, Naomi Schechter, Karthik Devarajan, Penny R Anderson, Elin R Sigurdson, Lori J Goldstein, Richard J Bleicher.   

Abstract

We examine risk of positive nonsentinel axillary nodes (NSN) and ≥4 positive nodes in patients with 1-2 positive sentinel nodes (SN) by age and tumor subtype approximated by ER, PR, and Her2 receptor status. Review of two institutional databases demonstrated 284 women undergoing breast conservation between 1997 and 2008 for T1-2 tumors and 1 (229) or 2 (55) positive SN followed by completion dissection. The median number of SN and total axillary nodes removed were 2 (range 1-10) and 14 (range 6-37), respectively. The rate of positive NSNs (p = 0.5) or ≥4 positive nodes (p = 0.6) was not associated with age. NSN were positive in 36% of luminal A, 26% of luminal B, 21% of TN and 38% of Her2+ (p = 0.4). Four or more nodes were present in 17% of luminal A, 13% luminal of B, 0% of TN and 29% of Her2+ (p = 0.1). Microscopic extracapsular extension was significantly associated with having NSNs positive (55% versus 24%, p < 0.0001) and with having total ≥4 nodes positive (33% versus 7%, p < 0.0001). In a population that was largely eligible for ACOSOG Z0011, the risk of positive NSN or ≥4 positive nodes did not vary significantly by age. The TN subgroup had the lowest risk of both positive NSN or ≥4 positive nodes. Several high risk groups with >15% risk for having ≥4 positive nodes were identified. Further data is needed to confirm that ACOSOG Z0011 results are equally applicable to all molecular phenotypes.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  axillary lymph nodes; breast cancer; molecular subtype; receptor status; sentinel node biopsy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24861613      PMCID: PMC4472437          DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  21 in total

1.  Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Bruce G Haffty; Qifeng Yang; Michael Reiss; Thomas Kearney; Susan A Higgins; Joanne Weidhaas; Lyndsay Harris; Willam Hait; Deborah Toppmeyer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Micrometastases in sentinel lymph node in a multicentric study: predictive factors of nonsentinel lymph node involvement--Groupe des Chirurgiens de la Federation des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer.

Authors:  Gilles Houvenaeghel; Claude Nos; Hervé Mignotte; Jean Marc Classe; Sylvie Giard; Philippe Rouanet; Frédérique Penault Lorca; Jocelyne Jacquemier; Valérie Jeanne Bardou
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Findings from NSABP Protocol No. B-04-comparison of radical mastectomy with alternative treatments for primary breast cancer. I. Radiation compliance and its relation to treatment outcome.

Authors:  B Fisher; E Montague; C Redmond; M Deutsch; G R Brown; A Zauber; W F Hanson; A Wong
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1980-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Basal subtype of invasive breast cancer is associated with a higher risk of true recurrence after conventional breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth; Jennifer Y Wo; Paul L Nguyen; Rita F Abi Raad; Meera Sreedhara; Andrzej Niemierko; Phoebe E Freer; Dianne Georgian-Smith; Jennifer R Bellon; Julia S Wong; Barbara L Smith; Jay R Harris; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Clinical investigation: regional nodal failure patterns in breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy without radiotherapy.

Authors:  Eric A Strom; Wendy A Woodward; Angela Katz; Thomas A Buchholz; George H Perkins; Anuja Jhingran; Richard Theriault; Eva Singletary; Aysegul Sahin; Marsha D McNeese
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients: assessment of an existing and a new predictive nomogram.

Authors:  Amy C Degnim; Carol Reynolds; Gouri Pantvaidya; Shaheen Zakaria; Tanya Hoskin; Sunni Barnes; Margaret V Roberts; Peter C Lucas; Kevin Oh; Meryem Koker; Michael S Sabel; Lisa A Newman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Predicting patients at low probability of requiring postmastectomy radiation therapy.

Authors:  Anees B Chagpar; Charles R Scoggins; Robert C G Martin; Earl F Cook; Terry McCurry; Nana Mizuguchi; Kristie J Paris; David J Carlson; Alison L Laidley; Souzan E El-Eid; Terre Q McGlothin; Kelly M McMasters
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Torsten O Nielsen; Forrest D Hsu; Kristin Jensen; Maggie Cheang; Gamze Karaca; Zhiyuan Hu; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Chad Livasy; Dave Cowan; Lynn Dressler; Lars A Akslen; Joseph Ragaz; Allen M Gown; C Blake Gilks; Matt van de Rijn; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy.

Authors:  Kimberly J Van Zee; Donna-Marie E Manasseh; Jose L B Bevilacqua; Susan K Boolbol; Jane V Fey; Lee K Tan; Patrick I Borgen; Hiram S Cody; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Factors associated with involvement of four or more axillary nodes for sentinel lymph node-positive patients.

Authors:  Angela Katz; Andrzej Niemierko; Irene Gage; Sheila Evans; Margaret Shaffer; Frederick P Smith; Alphonse Taghian; Colette Magnant
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  4 in total

1.  Non-sentinel axillary tumor burden applying the ACOSOG Z0011 eligibility criteria to a large routine cohort.

Authors:  Fabian Riedel; Jörg Heil; Manuel Feißt; Mahdi Rezai; Mareike Moderow; Christof Sohn; Florian Schütz; Michael Golatta; André Hennigs
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Age and Receptor Status Do Not Indicate the Need for Axillary Dissection in Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases.

Authors:  Anita Mamtani; Sujata Patil; Kimberly J Van Zee; Hiram S Cody; Melissa Pilewskie; Andrea V Barrio; Alexandra S Heerdt; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Impact of Size of the Tumour, Persistence of Estrogen Receptors, Progesterone Receptors, HER2Neu Receptors and Ki67 Values on Positivity of Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients with Early Breast Cancer with Clinically Negative Axillary Examination.

Authors:  Borislav Kondov; Rosalinda Isijanovska; Zvonko Milenkovikj; Gordana Petrusevska; Marija Jovanovski-Srceva; Magdalena Bogdanovska-Todorovska; Goran Kondov
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2017-10-26

4.  Breast Cancer Subtype is Associated With Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Zhen-Yu He; San-Gang Wu; Qi Yang; Jia-Yuan Sun; Feng-Yan Li; Qin Lin; Huan-Xin Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.