BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial demonstrated the safety of omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for women with fewer than three positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) who are undergoing breast-conservation therapy (BCT). Because most of the women were postmenopausal with estrogen receptor (ER) positive cancers, applicability of ALND for younger patients and those with triple-negative (TN) or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpressing (HER2+) tumors remains controversial. METHODS: From August 2010 to December 2015, patients undergoing BCT for cT1-2N0 disease and found to have positive SLNs were prospectively followed. Axillary lymph node dissection was indicated for more than two positive SLNs or gross extracapsular extension. Clinicopathologic characteristics, axillary surgery, nodal burden, and outcomes were compared between the high-risk patients (TN, HER2+, or age <50 years) and the remaining patients, termed average risk patients. RESULTS: Among 701 consecutive patients, 242 (35 %) were high risk: 31 (13 %) with TN, 48 (20 %) with HER2+, 130 (54 %) with age less than 50 years, and 33 (14 %) with more than one high-risk feature. The remaining 459 patients (65 %) were average risk. The high-risk patients were younger, had higher-grade tumors (p < 0.0001), and more often had abnormal nodes imaged (p = 0.02). In this study, SLNB alone was performed for 85 % high-risk versus 82 % average-risk cases (p = 0.39). A median of four versus three SLNs were excised (p = 0.04), and both groups had a median of one positive SLN. Additional positive nodes at ALND were found in 62 % high-risk patients versus 65 % average-risk patients (p = 0.8), with a median of three positive nodes in both groups. During a median follow-up period of 31 months, no patients experienced isolated axillary recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Axillary lymph node dissection was no more likely to be indicated for high-risk patients. For patients undergoing ALND, the nodal burden was similar. For patients otherwise meeting the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 clinical eligibility criteria, ALND is not indicated on the basis of age or subtype.
BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial demonstrated the safety of omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for women with fewer than three positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) who are undergoing breast-conservation therapy (BCT). Because most of the women were postmenopausal with estrogen receptor (ER) positive cancers, applicability of ALND for younger patients and those with triple-negative (TN) or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpressing (HER2+) tumors remains controversial. METHODS: From August 2010 to December 2015, patients undergoing BCT for cT1-2N0 disease and found to have positive SLNs were prospectively followed. Axillary lymph node dissection was indicated for more than two positive SLNs or gross extracapsular extension. Clinicopathologic characteristics, axillary surgery, nodal burden, and outcomes were compared between the high-risk patients (TN, HER2+, or age <50 years) and the remaining patients, termed average risk patients. RESULTS: Among 701 consecutive patients, 242 (35 %) were high risk: 31 (13 %) with TN, 48 (20 %) with HER2+, 130 (54 %) with age less than 50 years, and 33 (14 %) with more than one high-risk feature. The remaining 459 patients (65 %) were average risk. The high-risk patients were younger, had higher-grade tumors (p < 0.0001), and more often had abnormal nodes imaged (p = 0.02). In this study, SLNB alone was performed for 85 % high-risk versus 82 % average-risk cases (p = 0.39). A median of four versus three SLNs were excised (p = 0.04), and both groups had a median of one positive SLN. Additional positive nodes at ALND were found in 62 % high-risk patients versus 65 % average-risk patients (p = 0.8), with a median of three positive nodes in both groups. During a median follow-up period of 31 months, no patients experienced isolated axillary recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Axillary lymph node dissection was no more likely to be indicated for high-risk patients. For patients undergoing ALND, the nodal burden was similar. For patients otherwise meeting the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 clinical eligibility criteria, ALND is not indicated on the basis of age or subtype.
Authors: Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Jennifer K Litton; Kristine R Broglio; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Ronjay Rakkhit; Fatima Cardoso; Florentia Peintinger; Emer O Hanrahan; Aysegul Sahin; Merih Guray; Denis Larsimont; Francesco Feoli; Heidi Stranzl; Thomas A Buchholz; Vicente Valero; Richard Theriault; Martine Piccart-Gebhart; Peter M Ravdin; Donald A Berry; Gabriel N Hortobagyi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Karin Kast; Theresa Link; Katrin Friedrich; Andrea Petzold; Antje Niedostatek; Olaf Schoffer; Carmen Werner; Stefanie J Klug; Andreas Werner; Axel Gatzweiler; Barbara Richter; Gustavo Baretton; Pauline Wimberger Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth; Jennifer Y Wo; Paul L Nguyen; Rita F Abi Raad; Meera Sreedhara; Andrzej Niemierko; Phoebe E Freer; Dianne Georgian-Smith; Jennifer R Bellon; Julia S Wong; Barbara L Smith; Jay R Harris; Alphonse G Taghian Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-05-19 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Aman U Buzdar; Nuhad K Ibrahim; Deborah Francis; Daniel J Booser; Eva S Thomas; Richard L Theriault; Lajos Pusztai; Marjorie C Green; Banu K Arun; Sharon H Giordano; Massimo Cristofanilli; Debra K Frye; Terry L Smith; Kelly K Hunt; Sonja E Singletary; Aysegul A Sahin; Michael S Ewer; Thomas A Buchholz; Donald Berry; Gabriel N Hortobagyi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-02-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nils D Arvold; Alphonse G Taghian; Andrzej Niemierko; Rita F Abi Raad; Meera Sreedhara; Paul L Nguyen; Jennifer R Bellon; Julia S Wong; Barbara L Smith; Jay R Harris Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-09-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Carlos Ortega Expósito; Catalina Falo; Sonia Pernas; Samuel Pérez Carton; Miguel Gil Gil; Raul Ortega; Héctor Pérez Montero; Agostina Stradella; Evelyn Martinez; Maria Laplana; Sira Salinas; Ana Luzardo; Teresa Soler; Maria Eulalia Fernández Montoli; Juan Azcarate; Anna Guma; Anna Petit; Ana Benitez; Maite Bajen; Jose G Reyes Junca; Miriam Campos; Raquel Ruiz; Jordi Ponce; Maria J Pla; Amparo García Tejedor Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Cecilia T Ong; Samantha M Thomas; Rachel C Blitzblau; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Tristen S Park; Jennifer K Plichta; Laura H Rosenberger; Terry Hyslop; E Shelley Hwang; Rachel A Greenup Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2017-09-06 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Armando E Giuliano; Karla V Ballman; Linda McCall; Peter D Beitsch; Meghan B Brennan; Pond R Kelemen; David W Ollila; Nora M Hansen; Pat W Whitworth; Peter W Blumencranz; A Marilyn Leitch; Sukamal Saha; Kelly K Hunt; Monica Morrow Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: J M Simons; L B Koppert; E J T Luiten; C C van der Pol; S Samiei; J H W de Wilt; S Siesling; M L Smidt Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-03-16 Impact factor: 4.872