Literature DB >> 17116942

Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer.

Bruce G Haffty1, Qifeng Yang, Michael Reiss, Thomas Kearney, Susan A Higgins, Joanne Weidhaas, Lyndsay Harris, Willam Hait, Deborah Toppmeyer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the prognostic significance of triple negative breast cancers with respect to locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A database of conservative managed (conservative surgery followed by radiation) patients, in whom all three markers (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2/neu) were available, was reviewed. Patients were classified as triple negative if they tested negative for all three markers. Of 482 patients with all three markers available, 117 were classified as triple negative.
RESULTS: As of September 2005, with a median follow-up time of 7.9 years, of the 482 patients in the study, there have been 53 in-breast relapses, 10 nodal relapses, 77 distant relapses, and 69 deaths. At 5 years, the triple negative cohort had a poorer distant metastasis-free rate compared with the other subtypes (67% v 82%, respectively; P = .002). Triple negative subtype was an independent predictor of distant metastasis (hazard ratio = 2.14; 95% CI, 1.31 to 3.53; P = .002) and cause-specific survival (hazard ratio = 1.79; 95% CI, 1.03 to 3.22; P = .047). There was no significant difference in local control between the triple negative and other subtypes (83% v 83%, respectively). Of 99 BRCA-tested patients in this cohort, 10 had deleterious mutations in BRCA1, and seven had mutations in BRCA2. Of 10 BRCA1 patients, eight were triple negative, whereas only one of seven BRCA2 patients was triple negative (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Patients classified as triple negative have a poor prognosis. However, there was no evidence that these patients are at higher risk for local relapse after conservative surgery and radiation. Patients with BRCA1 mutations develop predominantly triple negative tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17116942     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.5664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  375 in total

1.  Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies.

Authors:  Brian D Lehmann; Joshua A Bauer; Xi Chen; Melinda E Sanders; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Yu Shyr; Jennifer A Pietenpol
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 2.  Triple-negative breast cancer: present challenges and new perspectives.

Authors:  Franca Podo; Lutgarde M C Buydens; Hadassa Degani; Riet Hilhorst; Edda Klipp; Ingrid S Gribbestad; Sabine Van Huffel; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Jan Luts; Daniel Monleon; Geert J Postma; Nicole Schneiderhan-Marra; Filippo Santoro; Hans Wouters; Hege G Russnes; Therese Sørlie; Elda Tagliabue; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  Beta-blocker use is associated with improved relapse-free survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Amal Melhem-Bertrandt; Mariana Chavez-Macgregor; Xiudong Lei; Erika N Brown; Richard T Lee; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Anil K Sood; Suzanne D Conzen; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Ana-Maria Gonzalez-Angulo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Triple-negative breast cancer in Lebanon: a case series.

Authors:  Marwan Ghosn; Carla Hajj; Joseph Kattan; Fadi Farhat; Fadi El Karak; Fadi Nasr; Gerard Abadjian; Georges Chahine
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-10-21

5.  Triple-negative breast cancer is not a contraindication for breast conservation.

Authors:  Farrell C Adkins; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Xiudong Lei; Leonel F Hernandez-Aya; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Jennifer K Litton; Jamie Wagner; Kelly K Hunt; Wendy A Woodward; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Gene-expression profiling in breast cancer: bespoke cancer therapy or more fiction than science?

Authors:  M Barry; M R Kell
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Outcome of triple-negative breast cancer in patients with or without deleterious BRCA mutations.

Authors:  Soley Bayraktar; Angelica M Gutierrez-Barrera; Diane Liu; Tunc Tasbas; Ugur Akar; Jennifer K Litton; E Lin; Constance T Albarracin; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Banu K Arun
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Evaluation of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the p53 binding protein 1 (TP53BP1) gene in breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and whole-breast irradiation (BCS + RT).

Authors:  Bruce G Haffty; Sharad Goyal; Diptee Kulkarni; Camille Green; Alexi Vazquez; Devora Schiff; Meena S Moran; Qifeng Yang; Shridar Ganesan; Kim M Hirsfield
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  Stress-induced EGF receptor signaling through STAT3 and tumor progression in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Nikolas Balanis; Cathleen R Carlin
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 4.102

10.  Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Meena S Moran; Stuart J Schnitt; Armando E Giuliano; Jay R Harris; Seema A Khan; Janet Horton; Suzanne Klimberg; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Gary Freedman; Nehmat Houssami; Peggy L Johnson; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.